Monthly Archives: April 2018

S.D.Fla.: The fact FL law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons

The fact Florida law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons for bank records. Presley & Presley P.A. v. United States, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65421 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 16, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: The fact FL law provides a reasonable expectation of privacy in bank records has nothing to do with an IRS summons

Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime

Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime by Christopher Raleigh Bousquet (opinion):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Wired: Why Police Should Monitor Social Media to Prevent Crime

CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

In a search warrant for financial fraud of defendant’s house, finding defendant there allowed a search of his wallet under the warrant. United States v. Shabazz, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 9774 (11th Cir. Apr. 18, 2018):

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Financial fraud SW permits search of def’s wallet on his person

CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale

While the affidavit for the search warrant didn’t clearly specify a time frame, it was inferred, and it was clearly reasonable to conclude on the totality that the defendant would still have the sought after images on his computer. United … Continue reading

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on CA11: While time wasn’t clearly stated, it was inferred on the totality; therefore, not stale

CA4: Even if Posse Comitatus Act was violated in investigation, there is no judicial remedy

Defendant argued “the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS) violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), 18 U.S.C. § 1385 (2012), by participating in the criminal investigation.” The motion wasn’t timely, and, on the merits, there is no remedy for violation. United … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on CA4: Even if Posse Comitatus Act was violated in investigation, there is no judicial remedy

New Law Review Article: “The vast majority of current Fourth Amendment doctrine unfounded, incoherent, and dangerous.”

Gray David, The Fourth Amendment Categorical Imperative, 116 Mich. L. Rev. Online 14 (2017): The vast majority of current Fourth Amendment doctrine unfounded, incoherent, and dangerous.

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: “The vast majority of current Fourth Amendment doctrine unfounded, incoherent, and dangerous.”

D.Nev.: Court order for cell phone detail information under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) requires only RS

A court order for cell phone detail information under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) requires only reasonable suspicion, following In re Applications of the United States of Am. for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d), 206 F. Supp. 3d … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Court order for cell phone detail information under 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) requires only RS

MA: Affidavit established MJ grow was for sale, not personal use

The affidavit for the search warrant established probable cause that defendant’s marijuana grow was for distribution and not for personal medical use. Commonwealth v. Richardson, 2018 Mass. LEXIS 236 (Apr. 17, 2018). The Franks challenge here was over an internet … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Affidavit established MJ grow was for sale, not personal use

MO: Warrantless seizure of black box data from semi violated 4A; automobile exception didn’t apply

After an accident, the information off the data recorder on defendant’s semi was seized and then searched by the police without a search warrant. The trial court suppressed, and the state filed an interlocutory appeal. Only three of its six … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on MO: Warrantless seizure of black box data from semi violated 4A; automobile exception didn’t apply

E.D. Mich.: Officers’ (and government’s) assertion of consent is so false it “tarnishes the entirety of the Government’s case.”

Officers’ (and government’s) assertion of consent is so false it “tarnishes the entirety of the Government’s case.” There was nothing near reasonable suspicion or consent. United States v. Smith, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62041 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 12, 2018):

Posted in Consent, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on E.D. Mich.: Officers’ (and government’s) assertion of consent is so false it “tarnishes the entirety of the Government’s case.”

E.D.Mich.: Def’s alternative argument as to what SW affidavit showed doesn’t undermine PC

The defendant’s alternative argument about how the child pornography ended up on defendant’s computer didn’t undermine the probable cause for the search warrant. “The Court has already addressed Defendant’s argument that a single connection between a home computer and a … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Def’s alternative argument as to what SW affidavit showed doesn’t undermine PC

TN: Argument “the rule” of witness exclusion of Rule 615 at suppression hearing has to be made in trial court

Defendant didn’t preserve for appeal his argument that the suppression hearing court allowed witnesses to sit in the rehearing of the suppression hearing because he didn’t make it to the trial court. At any rate, the transcripts of the hearing … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Argument “the rule” of witness exclusion of Rule 615 at suppression hearing has to be made in trial court

W.D.Tex.: In CA5, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule

In the Fifth Circuit, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule. United States v. Meza-Gonzalez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63254 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2018). Defendant fails on the second prong of Franks: excising the … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: In CA5, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule

W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

A DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422 (“RFPA”). “Having carefully reviewed the United States’ detailed response, the Court finds that there is a reasonable belief that the records sought are … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

Cohen pleadings online for today’s hearing in S.D.N.Y.

Two pleadings are online in Cohen v. United States, 1:18-mj-03161-KMW (S.D. N.Y.). A reply by Cohen may be filed today. Read them. The Government has the better argument. I don’t see Cohen’s argument against a “filter team” even in the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cohen pleadings online for today’s hearing in S.D.N.Y.

OH2: Description of “things to be seized” couldn’t be more particular

The search warrant for child pornography was particular and not overbroad. No more particular description was reasonably expected. “Under the circumstances, the search warrant could not reasonably have described the items more precisely.” Defendant’s search residence was in Wisconsin, and … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity | Comments Off on OH2: Description of “things to be seized” couldn’t be more particular

IN: Def’s backpack would have been searched anyway, so inevitable discovery applied

Inevitable discovery applied to the search of defendant’s backpack. He was arrested, and the search would have occurred as a result of that. The merits of defendant’s search claim is thus moot. Winborn v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 133 … Continue reading

Posted in Forfeiture, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IN: Def’s backpack would have been searched anyway, so inevitable discovery applied

N.D.Tex.: RS came from “extreme nervousness, conflicting stories, and the fact that he was traveling along a drug trafficking corridor”

“The government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Trooper Styles developed reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity during the initial stop and before Roberts consented to Trooper Styles’s request to search the Jeep. The facts of this case … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: RS came from “extreme nervousness, conflicting stories, and the fact that he was traveling along a drug trafficking corridor”

D.Neb.: Unwarned questioning about control of a bedroom wasn’t custodial

UnMirandized questioning about defendant’s control of a bedroom was a close call, but not found not custodial. “This case presents a close call. On balance, the Court concludes that under Muniz and Fleck and the circumstances of this case, Sergeant … Continue reading

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Unwarned questioning about control of a bedroom wasn’t custodial

CA9: On the scene determination of PC justified arreat and detention for 47 hours, despite later dismissal

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest based on the officer’s on the scene determination. He was held 47 hours and released. The jury in the civil case found for the defendants, and the district court did not abuse its … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: On the scene determination of PC justified arreat and detention for 47 hours, despite later dismissal