Daily Archives: April 26, 2018

AZ: Statutory GFE interpreted same as 4A GFE absent reason not to

The state’s statutory good faith exception is coextensive with the Fourth Amendment good faith exception, absent a compelling argument from the defendant. A pre-Birchfield breath test was valid under the good faith exception of Davis, already applied in Arizona. Alsarraf … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on AZ: Statutory GFE interpreted same as 4A GFE absent reason not to

CO: Def was ticketed, but car was impounded without reasonable justification; suppressed

Defendant was issued a citation for a traffic offense, and then the officers decided to impound his car. There was no justification for the impoundment, and the search of the vehicle is suppressed. People v. Brown, 2018 CO 27, 2018 … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on CO: Def was ticketed, but car was impounded without reasonable justification; suppressed

W.D.Ky.: Backup officer to traffic stop immediately used drug dog, and that wasn’t unreasonable

Defendants’ failure to stop at stop signs was justification for the stop. A backup officer with a drug dog did a dog sniff around the car while the basic stuff of the traffic stop was being done. This did not … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Backup officer to traffic stop immediately used drug dog, and that wasn’t unreasonable

CA10: Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality; district court erred in finding Franks violation from omission of report

Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality. Defendant was the target of a health fraud investigation with a detailed affidavit that omitted a reference to a letter from state regulators that made no reference to health care fraud. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA10: Under the Franks doctrine, relevance doesn’t equate with materiality; district court erred in finding Franks violation from omission of report

E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man. That alone did not create exigent circumstances. Certainly the parents would be concerned, but there was no evidence that … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A 16 year old girl, over the age of consent, was in a hotel room with a 45 year old man; that alone was not exigency

OH6: Challenge to credibility of one witness at suppression hearing wasn’t the PC challenge made on appeal

A challenge in the trial court that one of the officers wasn’t credible isn’t the same argument as there being a failure of probable cause. Therefore, the probable cause issue hasn’t been preserved. State v. Gibbs, 2018-Ohio-1549, 2018 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH6: Challenge to credibility of one witness at suppression hearing wasn’t the PC challenge made on appeal