W.D.Mo.: Def volunteering he had a warrant justified extending stop; driver’s statement passenger hid a gun was RS

Defendant volunteered early in the stop that he had a warrant out for him, and that alone justified continuing the stop. The driver of the vehicle told the officer that defendant put a gun under the seat, and that justified a search for it. United States v. Minor, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158570 (W.D. Mo. Nov. 24, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 158278 (W.D.Mo. Nov. 24, 2015).

Officers had pole cameras installed around defendant’s property for a year, and they got a Title III warrant to install video and audio inside, and they did sneak and peaks to check on apparent drugs they saw being packaged. But, this case isn’t about that. When defendant left the property they asked patrol officers to make a stop, and a signaling violation occurred. The LPN was not in order, and the vehicle was going to be impounded without arrest, but defendant was allowed to retrieve his cell phone. The traffic stop was valid, and the seizure of $20,000 in cash was reasonable. [There was likely also PC for the automobile exception based on all that transpired on the wires, but that isn’t even discussed as a basis.] United States v. Munoz, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159443 (D.Utah Nov. 24, 2015).

This entry was posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.