Daily Archives: August 10, 2015

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect by Sharon McCloskey: In her dissenting opinion, state Supreme Court Justice Robin Hudson projected what might follow from a ruling condoning an officer’s subjective interpretation of the law: … Hudson was right.

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on NC Policy Blog: The Heien Effect

AK: Drug paraphernalia and meth were found by plain feel

On defendant’s stop, the officer saw a cut off straw in defendant’s shirt pocket, and a frisk was justified because of hands in the pockets. The frisk of his thin material shorts revealed a lighter and more straws and it … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Drug paraphernalia and meth were found by plain feel

VI: Arrest for possession of an unlicensed firearm required knowledge that the defendant had no license, not just that he possessed a firearm

Defendant’s arrest for possession of an unlicensed firearm in the Territory required knowledge that the defendant had no license, not just that he possessed a firearm. Motion to suppress granted. People v. Pryce, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 91 (Super.Ct. July 27, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause | Comments Off on VI: Arrest for possession of an unlicensed firearm required knowledge that the defendant had no license, not just that he possessed a firearm

CA6: Michigan’s state forfeiture law doesn’t deprive due process after an officer seizes money

Officers can issue a notice of forfeiture under Michigan law, and the person subject to the forfeiture has a valid state remedy, and that satisfies due process. “Officer Jones’s testimony is troubling, and municipalities should take care to operate within … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA6: Michigan’s state forfeiture law doesn’t deprive due process after an officer seizes money

OH10: A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test

A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test. State v. Goins, 2015-Ohio-3121, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3039 (10th Dist. August 4, 2015). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not pursuing a motion to suppress before … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, DNA, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH10: A CODIS hit on defendant’s DNA was probable cause for a confirmatory DNA test

UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

Officers do not need reasonable suspicion to conduct a knock-and-talk. Defendant’s consent to enter wasn’t involuntary because he thought he couldn’t refuse because he was on probation. State v. Fretheim, 2015 UT App 197, 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 206 (August … Continue reading

Posted in Knock and talk, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

CI’s prediction of defendant’s route of travel with heroin was corroborated by GPS placed on defendant’s car with a warrant. United States v. Reaves, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13745 (7th Cir. August 6, 2015). A citizen informant called DC Metro … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

W.D.N.C.: Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit

Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit for search warrant. Even exculpatory information doesn’t always undermine probable cause. United States v. Awtrey, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103284 (W.D.N.C. July … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Just because something is exculpatory, it isn’t a Franks violation to fail to include it in the affidavit