Daily Archives: August 30, 2015

ND: State didn’t even attempt to justify inventory; policy was required to be proved

The trial court did not err in finding that the impoundment and inventory was unreasonable. The vehicle was unlicensed, but the officer did not decide to inventory it until he found out defendant gave him a false identification. The state … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on ND: State didn’t even attempt to justify inventory; policy was required to be proved

ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

A drug dog putting his nose up to the open window during an exterior dog sniff was not a search of the interior. The officers didn’t tell him to do it, and the dog was just following his smell (citing … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on ID: Dog putting nose in open window of car wasn’t search; it was dog following smell

C.D.Ill.: Calls to wife showed exigency for potential removal of drugs hidden in safe in house

Defendant’s calls to his wife showed there was exigency in the contents of a safe at their house because he wanted it moved immediately. That was exigency. Also, she had apparent authority to consent. United States v. Simmons, 2015 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Calls to wife showed exigency for potential removal of drugs hidden in safe in house

OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency

Home burglar alarm brought the police via the alarm company. They found the door cracked open, and that was exigent circumstances for an entry. State v. Foster, 2015-Ohio-3401, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3316 (3d Dist. August 24, 2015). The certified … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on OH3: Home burglar alarm company call and partially open door is exigency