Daily Archives: August 24, 2015

OH5: Citizen informant’s DUI tip line call wasn’t specific enough about DUI to support a stop

Defendant’s wife called a DUI tip line that he was driving having consumed alcohol. An officer stopped him without waiting for a traffic offense, which he would usually do. While she was an identified citizen informant, the tip was not … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Citizen informant’s DUI tip line call wasn’t specific enough about DUI to support a stop

MN: Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants

Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants. State v. Lindquist, 2015 Minn. LEXIS 469 (August 19, 2015):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on MN: Davis good faith exception applies to police conduct prior to McNeely in DUI warrants

NE: The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary

The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary. State v. Modlin, 291 Neb. 660, 2015 Neb. LEXIS 152 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NE: The fact defendant in a DUI case has a difficult choice between consenting to BAC search or refusing consent with the attendant possible penalties does not make his consent involuntary

KS: Stipulating issue then arguing against it is like invited error

The state complained the defense motion to suppress was too general, and defense counsel stipulated to narrowing it to something substantive. The state was arguing that it did not have to argue every conceivable exception to the warrant requirement for … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on KS: Stipulating issue then arguing against it is like invited error