Daily Archives: August 5, 2015

CA4: Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order; but GFE applies this time

Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order. The government, however, gets a good faith argument for reliance on the Stored Communications Act. [Not so the next time.] United States v. Graham, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Cell site location information requires a search warrant or other court order; but GFE applies this time

EFF: A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA’s Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone

EFF: A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA’s Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone by Andrew Crocker: One of the most outrageous ways that the government has violated our Fourth Amendment rights against general seizures and searches … Continue reading

Posted in FISA | Comments Off on EFF: A New Milestone: Appeals Court to Consider NSA’s Mass Seizures and Searches on the Internet Backbone

D.Neb.: Bodycam video shows that defendant did not consent to police entry during a knock-and-talk

Bodycam video shows that defendant did not consent to police entry during a knock-and-talk. It was mere acquiescence to a claim of authority. Inside they could smell marijuana. United States v. Rodriguez, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98292 (D.Neb. July 28, … Continue reading

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Bodycam video shows that defendant did not consent to police entry during a knock-and-talk

E.D.Tenn.: It is not defendant’s burden in a warrantless search to anticipate in the motion to suppress all the justifications the police may have for it

It is not defendant’s burden in a warrantless search to anticipate in the motion to suppress all the justifications the police may have for the search. It’s the government’s burden to plead and prove an exception. Here, they showed probable … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: It is not defendant’s burden in a warrantless search to anticipate in the motion to suppress all the justifications the police may have for it

W.D.Mo.: Failure to show or leave a copy of the SW or make the inventory in the def’s presence has nothing to do with his statements

“Defendant James Allen Crippen filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence in the matter (Doc. 25) in which he argues that officers executing a search warrant at his home violated Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Failure to show or leave a copy of the SW or make the inventory in the def’s presence has nothing to do with his statements

E.D.La.: Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew?

Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew? True or not, that has no … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate | Comments Off on E.D.La.: Is a USMJ neutral and detached when the target of the search warrant the judge just signed is allegedly having an affair with the judge’s husband but the defense can’t prove the judge knew?

D.P.R.: Failure to challenge standing finding in R&R is waiver

Defendant was found without standing to challenge a search of an apartment, and he didn’t contest that in the R&R, so that’s binding. He did challenge the search of his person, and the case is remanded for further consideration of … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Failure to challenge standing finding in R&R is waiver

New Law Review Article: Drone Technology and the Fourth Amendment: Aerial Surveillance Precedent and Kyllo Do Not Account for Current Technology

New Law Review Article: Drone Technology and the Fourth Amendment: Aerial Surveillance Precedent and Kyllo Do Not Account for Current Technology by Veronica E. McKnight, 51 Cal. W. L. Rev. No. 2, Article 4 (2015).

Posted in Drones, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Drone Technology and the Fourth Amendment: Aerial Surveillance Precedent and Kyllo Do Not Account for Current Technology

WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough

WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough by Radley Balko: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a troubling ruling about drug dogs last week. U.S. v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff | Comments Off on WaPo: Federal appeals court: Drug dog that’s barely more accurate than a coin flip is good enough