Monthly Archives: May 2014

E.D.Pa.: Motion for new trial is not the place to relitigate a motion to suppress

A motion for new trial is not the place to relitigate a motion to suppress. Of course it was damaging: most searches are. “Defendant goes to great lengths in his Motion to explain how damaging the evidence seized at Franklin … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Motion for new trial is not the place to relitigate a motion to suppress

OH5: Knock-and-talk doesn’t permit entry into backyard, too

Knock-and-talk is a legitimate law enforcement technique, but other officers fanning out to enter the backyard, the curtilage, at the same time is not. The observations in the backyard lead to suppression of the search. State v. Morgan, 2014-Ohio-1900, 2014 … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on OH5: Knock-and-talk doesn’t permit entry into backyard, too

New Law Review Article: Spillover Across Remedies

Michael Coenen, Spillover Across Remedies, 98 Minn. L. Rev. 1211 (2014). Abstract: Remedies influence rights, and rights apply across remedies. Combined together, these two phenomena produce the problem of spillover across remedies. The spillover problem occurs when considerations specific to … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Uncategorized | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: Spillover Across Remedies

D.Mass.: Prison visitor strip search lacked justification; no qualified immunity

Plaintiff’s prison visit questioning for 15-20 minutes about whether she had brought drugs into a prison was reasonable. Her strip search based on an anonymous tip was completely uncorroborated and was without reasonable suspicion. The law had been clearly established … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Prison visitor strip search lacked justification; no qualified immunity

E.D.Wis.: If defendant doesn’t tell his lawyer something, the lawyer can’t be ineffective about it

Defendant contends that the search of his vehicle was without his consent, and defense counsel was ineffective for not raising that issue. The court finds as a fact that defendant never mentioned that to defense counsel, therefore, counsel couldn’t be … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: If defendant doesn’t tell his lawyer something, the lawyer can’t be ineffective about it

E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

At worst, the officer’s omission of three things from the affidavit for search warrant was negligent, not reckless, and, even if the material was included, it doesn’t defeat the finding of probable cause. “Thus, because Mr. Simpson has failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

WaPo: Volokh: My defense of the third-party doctrine, and a response to Randy and Stewart

WaPo: Volokh: My defense of the third-party doctrine, and a response to Randy and Stewart by Orin Kerr: With my co-bloggers Randy Barnett and Stewart Baker debating Smith v. Maryland and the third-party doctrine, I figured I would offer some … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: My defense of the third-party doctrine, and a response to Randy and Stewart

Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature

Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature: More states have approved legislation requiring law enforcement to obtain warrants to track cell-phone location data, measure that passed the Texas House last year … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informational privacy | Comments Off on Grits for Breakfast: Virginia, Utah, require warrants for phone location data, Tennessee bill awaiting gov’s signature

Network World: No reasonable expectation of privacy when third parties cross the creepy line?

Network World: No reasonable expectation of privacy when third parties cross the creepy line? by Ms. Smith: A former DHS official suggests SCOTUS has no business expanding Fourth Amendment protections to protect our privacy from third parties who cross the … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Network World: No reasonable expectation of privacy when third parties cross the creepy line?

New Law Review Article: School Surveillance And The Fourth Amendment

Jason P. Nance, School Surveillance And The Fourth Amendment, 2014 Wis. L. Rev. 79. Abstract: In the aftermath of several highly-publicized incidents of school violence, public school officials have increasingly turned to intense surveillance methods to promote school safety. The … Continue reading

Posted in School searches | Comments Off on New Law Review Article: School Surveillance And The Fourth Amendment

WaPo: Volokh: Smith v. Maryland as a good first-order estimate of reasonable privacy expectations

WaPo: Volokh: Smith v. Maryland as a good first-order estimate of reasonable privacy expectations by Stewart Baker: Earlier, I promised a post that would make the positive case for the third-party doctrine and Smith v. Maryland. The case against it … Continue reading

Posted in Informational privacy | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Smith v. Maryland as a good first-order estimate of reasonable privacy expectations

Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion

Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion by Elliott Young: On April 14, a federal magistrate judge in Portland, Janice M. Stewart, ruled that Clackamas County violated Miranda Olivares’ Fourth Amendment rights protecting against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war by Radley Balko Back in 2011, police in Framingham, Massachusetts conducted a drug raid that cost an innocent man his life.

Posted in Uncategorized, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley by David E. Sanger: Nearly a year after the first disclosures about the National Security Agency’s surveillance practices at home and abroad, the agency is emerging … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, FISA, Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

CA3: Ptf’s § 1983 case implies invalidity of criminal case so it’s barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint necessarily implies the invalidity of his conviction and it’s barred by Heck v. Humphrey. Ollie v. Brown, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8302 (3d Cir. May 2, 2014). Defendant’s guilty plea waived any claim that the consent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf’s § 1983 case implies invalidity of criminal case so it’s barred by Heck

KY: Shot fired from car in flight reason for search of car; no violation of Gant

Officers could perform a search incident of defendant’s vehicle because a shot was fired from it in flight. This was not a violation of Gant. The search could also be justified by inventory. Hinchey v. Commonwealth, 2014 Ky. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on KY: Shot fired from car in flight reason for search of car; no violation of Gant

OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

Defendant argued the search of her bedroom was without consent, therefore invalid. The trial court found probable cause and sustained the search. Reversed: Without an exception to the warrant requirement, the search was invalid, and the state argues none. State … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OR: Search of home requires more than just PC; there must be a warrant or warrant exception

GA: Stopping a white man leaving a black neighborhood was pretextual and suppressed

A white man coming from an African-American neighborhood, profiling him as a drug buyer, was a pretextual stop based on pattern of activity rather than particularized suspicion. His stop violated the Fourth Amendment. Williams v. State, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Stopping a white man leaving a black neighborhood was pretextual and suppressed

IA: No qualified immunity for overseizure in violation of SW; county attorney’s opinion conferred no additional immunity

The police here were held liable in a § 1983 case in state court for overseizure beyond the scope of the search warrant. They brought along the alleged victim who told them what else to seize and none of it … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on IA: No qualified immunity for overseizure in violation of SW; county attorney’s opinion conferred no additional immunity

D.Ore.: No standing in rental car a month overdue and reported stolen

Defendant had a rental car one month past its three day rental period, and it had been reported stolen. He had no standing or reasonable expectation of privacy in the car. United States v. Brown, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59747 … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ore.: No standing in rental car a month overdue and reported stolen