Daily Archives: May 30, 2014

PoliceOne: How to protect your career by writing better use-of-force reports

PoliceOne: How to protect your career by writing better use-of-force reports by Matt Stiehm: We must change our “less is more” mentality on UOF reports to a “more is more” mindset for the next generation of police officers Law enforcement … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on PoliceOne: How to protect your career by writing better use-of-force reports

CA9: Forced rectal search for cocaine was unreasonable for lack of exigency

Plaintiff was subjected to a forced rectal search for drugs at a hospital. Police officers allegedly falsified the report to the hospital about defendant having a seizure to get the search done there when they had already concluded that plaintiff … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on CA9: Forced rectal search for cocaine was unreasonable for lack of exigency

CA9: Applying a functional reasonableness analysis, the 21 day delay in getting a SW after computer seizure was reasonable

In a child pornography case, defendant’s computer was held for 21 days before a search warrant was obtained, and he moved to suppress. On the totality, the court finds the delay reasonable and did not substantially interfere with defendant’s possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA9: Applying a functional reasonableness analysis, the 21 day delay in getting a SW after computer seizure was reasonable

CA5: Frisking rousted man who denied having gun was without reasonable suspicion

A convoy of police arrive in an apartment complex because it’s a high crime area, and one walks up to defendant’s car and talks to him asking “where’s your gun?” He says he doesn’t have one. Then the officer asks … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA5: Frisking rousted man who denied having gun was without reasonable suspicion

MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue

Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not an unreasonable search and seizure or a Fourth Amendment issue. Besides, there was no sign anywhere that there would be a turning over of records to law enforcement. Arbor Farms v. Geostar … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MI: Appointment of a post-judgment collection receiver was not a Fourth Amendment issue