Daily Archives: May 4, 2014

Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion

Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion by Elliott Young: On April 14, a federal magistrate judge in Portland, Janice M. Stewart, ruled that Clackamas County violated Miranda Olivares’ Fourth Amendment rights protecting against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Oregon Live: Mandatory immigration detainers are unconstitutional: Guest opinion

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

WaPo: Just another day in the drug war by Radley Balko Back in 2011, police in Framingham, Massachusetts conducted a drug raid that cost an innocent man his life.

Posted in Uncategorized, Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Just another day in the drug war

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley by David E. Sanger: Nearly a year after the first disclosures about the National Security Agency’s surveillance practices at home and abroad, the agency is emerging … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, FISA, Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYTimes: News Analysis: In Surveillance Debate, White House Turns Its Focus to Silicon Valley

CA3: Ptf’s § 1983 case implies invalidity of criminal case so it’s barred by Heck

Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint necessarily implies the invalidity of his conviction and it’s barred by Heck v. Humphrey. Ollie v. Brown, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8302 (3d Cir. May 2, 2014). Defendant’s guilty plea waived any claim that the consent … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Ineffective assistance, Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA3: Ptf’s § 1983 case implies invalidity of criminal case so it’s barred by Heck

KY: Shot fired from car in flight reason for search of car; no violation of Gant

Officers could perform a search incident of defendant’s vehicle because a shot was fired from it in flight. This was not a violation of Gant. The search could also be justified by inventory. Hinchey v. Commonwealth, 2014 Ky. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on KY: Shot fired from car in flight reason for search of car; no violation of Gant