Daily Archives: May 17, 2014

The Atlantic: What If U.S. Cities Just Stopped Participating in the War on Drugs?

The Atlantic: What If U.S. Cities Just Stopped Participating in the War on Drugs? by Jake Cole: As gridlock has become the norm in Washington, U.S. cities are increasingly going it alone in the search for solutions to the country’s … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Atlantic: What If U.S. Cities Just Stopped Participating in the War on Drugs?

NYT: Robbery Suspect Tracked by GPS and Killed

NYT: Robbery Suspect Tracked by GPS and Killed by Joseph Goldstein and Michael Schwirtz: Relying on a GPS device placed in a decoy pill bottle, police officers tracked an armed man suspected of robbing a pharmacy on Friday afternoon and … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYT: Robbery Suspect Tracked by GPS and Killed

TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely

TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely. Weems v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 5109 (Tex. App.–San Antonio May 14, 2014): We agree with both the Amarillo [Sutherland v. State, No. 07-12-00289-CR, 2014 Tex. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TX4 follows TX7 and TX13 and holds warrantless blood draw violates McNeely

FL2: Officer’s seizing pills he couldn’t identify as contraband violated Fourth Amendment

Officers seeing then seizing pills he couldn’t identify (Ritalin) until he later got on the Internet seized them without probable cause or reasonable suspicion. Gay v. State, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7121 (Fla. 2d DCA May 14, 2014): Here, neither … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Officer’s seizing pills he couldn’t identify as contraband violated Fourth Amendment

CA3: Knock-and-talk at back door violated curtilage and Fourth Amendment

The knock and talk exception only applies to the front door. If the officer goes to the back door first, the knock and talk exception doesn’t apply. The officer’s entry onto the curtilage here was a violation of the curtilage … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Curtilage, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA3: Knock-and-talk at back door violated curtilage and Fourth Amendment