Daily Archives: May 28, 2014

WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’?

WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’? by Orin Kerr: During the recent oral argument in United States v. Wurie, the pending cell phone search case, Justice Alito asked an important question about the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on WaPo: Volokh: Answering Justice Alito’s question: What makes an expectation of privacy ‘reasonable’?

IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

Two police officers came to defendant’s home to arrest her for DUI, and her husband arguably consented to an entry to arrest her. Her locking herself in the bathroom, however, was a rejection of consent and binding. The officer’s threatening … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on IL: Def’s locking self in bathroom overcame husband’s consent to enter under Randolph

IL: For an IAC claim to succeed, the underlying claim must be meritorious, not just likely to succeed

For a search and seizure IAC claim to succeed, the underlying claim must be meritorious, not just likely to succeed. Not filing a motion to suppress may be trial tactics, and, here, the question was whether there was probable cause, … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IL: For an IAC claim to succeed, the underlying claim must be meritorious, not just likely to succeed

CA11: PC of identity theft in def’s car was sufficient for automobile exception

Postal inspectors had probable cause to believe that there was evidence in defendant’s car, a postal worker suspected of identity theft from people on her route. Alternatively, the search incident doctrine supported the search. United States v. Adigun, 2014 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent | Comments Off on CA11: PC of identity theft in def’s car was sufficient for automobile exception

Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone

Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone by Sen. Rand Paul and Sen. Chris Coons: Privacy is a core American value. For 235 years, the Fourth Amendment has protected us from unwarranted searches of our personal belongings. All … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on Politico: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smartphone