Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

Cal.1st: Cell phone probation search condition not unreasonable; def to rid self of gang affiliations

An electronic search condition of probation is not per se unreasonable under Riley. Here, it was reasonable to show whether defendant ridded himself of his gang affiliations which was a condition of probation. People v. Guzman, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Cell phone probation search condition not unreasonable; def to rid self of gang affiliations

S.D.Ohio: Riley‘s cell phone SW requirement doesn’t apply to probation searches of a cell phone

Riley does not require a warrant for a probation search of a probationer’s cell phone. United States v. Fletcher, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65591 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2018). Officers had probable cause to search the trunk of a car … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Riley‘s cell phone SW requirement doesn’t apply to probation searches of a cell phone

S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

Defendant was on parole and allegedly shot at somebody. That justified a parole search of his residence. The fact he was in jail at the time didn’t matter. United States v. Jaiman, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64797 (S.D. N.Y. Apr. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Parole search was valid despite def being in jail at time

CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

“Sweeney neither challenged the finding of untimeliness before the district court, nor does he now argue that his delay in filing the motion to suppress was excused by good cause. As such, because of his waiver, we need not address … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA1: Suppression motion was untimely without a showing of good cause, and it would not be determined on appeal

E.D.Mich.: No PC for the warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in PC that the GFE wouldn’t apply

There was no probable cause for issuance of the search warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in probable cause because there was at least something. “The officers, therefore, acted in good faith in executing the warrant because, although the affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: No PC for the warrant, but it wasn’t “so lacking” in PC that the GFE wouldn’t apply

Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

Defendant was visiting a friend when the friend’s PO showed up for an unannounced search. Defendant was detained, too. His detention was unreasonable. People v. Gutierrez, 2018 Cal. App. LEXIS 282 (5th Dist. Mar. 29, 2018). This defendant challenged the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.5: Detaining visiting non-probationer during probation search was unreasonable

CA7: State’s use of state’s “John Doe” proceedings was shown to be in good faith

In the court’s second view of Wisconsin’s unique John Doe proceedings, the Seventh Circuit decides only the good faith exception and concludes that the reliance on state law and compliance with the Stored Communications Act was all in good faith. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA7: State’s use of state’s “John Doe” proceedings was shown to be in good faith

WA: State const. requires nexus between parole violation and scope of probation search

“It is well established that an individual on probation has a reduced expectation of privacy, and a community corrections officer (CCO) may conduct a warrantless search if he or she suspects the individual has violated a probation condition. The issue … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Probation / Parole search, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: State const. requires nexus between parole violation and scope of probation search

Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

“We hold that when a probationer gives a false name to a police officer, and a record check of that name fails to reveal that the probationer is in fact subject to a search condition, the probationer is estopped from … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1: Def’s false name was intended to avoid probation search condition; he’s estopped to argue exclusionary rule

LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

Defendant was arrested for possession of marijuana so the search of his wallet was justified as a search incident. As a parolee, his hotel room was his “residence” for purposes of a parole search. State v. Warren, 2018 La. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on LA3: Once parolee found in possession of MJ, search of his hotel room was justified

DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

Deciding an issue of first impression in the state, the court concludes that the exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings. Surveying law from other states, some recognize a bad faith exception for probation searches, but this case … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on DE: Exclusionary rule does not apply in probation revocation proceedings

D.Nev.: Motorcycle gang’s jacket and other vague things wasn’t RS; a Terry frisk requires separate justification from a Terry stop

A Terry stop doesn’t automatically include the ability to conduct a frisk because they have separate justifications. Here, defendant was wearing a motorcycle gang jacket, but nothing else came close to providing reasonable suspicion, and the motion to suppress is … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Motorcycle gang’s jacket and other vague things wasn’t RS; a Terry frisk requires separate justification from a Terry stop

CA11: District court didn’t commit plain error by imposing suspicionless supervised release condition

Defendant was convicted of wire fraud, and the district court imposed a condition of suspicionless searches for supervised releases. He complains that the court didn’t adequately explain the justification. No case says that the district court needed to, and there … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA11: District court didn’t commit plain error by imposing suspicionless supervised release condition

D.Kan.: After entry to arrest parole absconder, the govt could rely on protective sweep, plain view, and plain smell doctrines to expand the entry

Officers had a parole absconder warrant to retake defendant. At his motel room door, they could smell marijuana inside. After the entry, the government could rely on protective sweep, plain view, and plain smell doctrines to expand the entry. Finally, … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Kan.: After entry to arrest parole absconder, the govt could rely on protective sweep, plain view, and plain smell doctrines to expand the entry

E.D.N.C.: State law limits on parole and probation’s search authority applies in federal court; it defines the REP

Defendant was subject to a state parole search condition that required reasonable suspicion and is also governed by Griffin’s special needs exception. “the language in a parole search condition is an important factor to consider when assessing the reasonableness of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: State law limits on parole and probation’s search authority applies in federal court; it defines the REP

E.D.N.C.: The parole search here violated the state parole search authorization and is suppressed

Defendant was subject to a state parole search condition that required reasonable suspicion and is also governed by Griffin’s special needs exception. “the language in a parole search condition is an important factor to consider when assessing the reasonableness of … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: The parole search here violated the state parole search authorization and is suppressed

D.Minn.: Def’s admission of violation of internet limits on supervised release was RS

Defendant was on federal supervised release, and the reasonable suspicion of Knights applies, and the officers had it here because defendant admitted a violation of his internet usage agreement with the PO. United States v. Kuhnel, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Def’s admission of violation of internet limits on supervised release was RS

CA5: PO’s information from DEA plus additional facts was RS for probation search

Defendant was on probation for a state drug offense, and he was a good probationer, so his PO was working toward early termination of probation. Then the DEA calls the PO that they suspect him of being involved in drug … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA5: PO’s information from DEA plus additional facts was RS for probation search

D.Neb.: Giving home alarm code helps show consent

The record supports that defendant consented to his probation search. Giving the alarm code helps show consent. There was no objection to the probation search at any time. United States v. Wilson, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8815 (D. Neb. Jan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Giving home alarm code helps show consent

ID: Where probation agreement searches occur “at the request of” PO, searching without request was fatal

Defendant’s probation agreement said that he’d submit to probation searches “at the request of” the probation officer. Searching without a prior request was fatal. State v. Jaskowski, 2018 Ida. LEXIS 19 (Jan 18, 2018). “The Franks challenge to paragraph three … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on ID: Where probation agreement searches occur “at the request of” PO, searching without request was fatal