Jail searches: (1) body scan led to SW for body cavity search and (2) biometric scans reasonable

Plaintiff was subjected to an electronic body scan that led to a body cavity search with a warrant for an apparent mass inside him. This search was reasonable. Brown v. Suess, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220823 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2026).

Facial biometric scans of inmates in a jail violate no privacy interest. Jones v. Mata, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220261 (N.D. Ind. Sep. 24, 2026).

A suspicionless GPS search condition for a probationer was reasonable. United States v. Taplin, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 220219 (D. Or. Sep. 28, 2026).*

Given the trial court found the officer not credible, on these facts, the order of suppression is affirmed. State v. Caughenbaugh, 2026-Ohio-3809 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Facial recognition, GPS / Tracking Data, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.