Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

CA6: While federal law requires RS for a supervised release search, it wasn’t error for district court here to permit suspicionless searches

District court did not plainly err in imposing a suspicionless search condition separate from federal law that normally requires reasonable suspicion. United States v. Sulik, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10450 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020). “Nothing in the record suggests … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: While federal law requires RS for a supervised release search, it wasn’t error for district court here to permit suspicionless searches

D.Conn.: Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was RS and justified its search

Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was a violation of defendant’s probation and provided reasonable suspicion for a search of the phone. Aside from the legitimate reasons for having a smartphone, “[c]onsidering that a smartphone is often used as an instrumentality … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was RS and justified its search

CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

Trash pulls by police are not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, notwithstanding a local ordinance that limits trash collectors to rummaging in trash. United States v. Mathis, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10275 (6th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020). Defendant’s probation search … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week

SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week includes: Hamm v. Tennessee19-1059Issue: Whether police violate the Fourth Amendment when they conduct a suspicionless search of a probationer’s home.

Posted in Probation / Parole search, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week

CO: Cell phone SW is particular if it gives just the phone number and expected owner’s name

A cell phone search warrant is sufficiently particular by identifying merely the phone number and the expected owner of the phone. People v. Pettigrew, 2020 COA 46, 2020 Colo. App. LEXIS 656 (Mar. 26, 2020). Defense counsel didn’t fail to … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CO: Cell phone SW is particular if it gives just the phone number and expected owner’s name

M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

A delay of seven weeks for seeking a search warrant for a cell phone already validly seized wasn’t unreasonable. Several cases approved long delays, and this is near the outer limit, but still valid. United States v. Butler, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

M.D.N.C.: Two SWs were issued, and second did not supersede the first

Two search warrants were issued May 28 & 29, 2019. They were both issued with probable cause, they weren’t stale, and the second did not supersede the first. No case supports this latter argument. United States v. Atkins, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Two SWs were issued, and second did not supersede the first

NC: State fails to show need for satellite based monitoring of sex offender who won’t be released from prison until 2032

The state fails to show the need for constant satellite based monitoring for defendant convicted sex offender who won’t even be released from prison until 2032. State v. Gordon, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 205 (Mar. 17, 2020):

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: State fails to show need for satellite based monitoring of sex offender who won’t be released from prison until 2032

CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

Even if the supervised release search here was without reasonable suspicion, the purposes of the exclusionary rule aren’t served. “Even assuming [Officer] Dyckman acted unreasonably in failing to conduct further investigation before executing the search, this is not the kind … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

The trial court’s grant of suppression is reversed and remanded because of its inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law for appellate review. State v. Peeks, 2020-Ohio-889, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 812 (10th Dist. Mar. 10, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

The court sustains a nighttime search warrant based solely on the fact that there were some sales of drugs from the house without specifying the time, and that it was “urgent” that the raid happen now for drugs, potential weapons, … Continue reading

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

NC: 30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable

30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable under Grady v. North Carolina and subsequent state cases. State v. Griffin, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 139 (Feb. 18, 2020). The trial court credited the officer’s testimony … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: 30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable

CA9: Unobjected to supervised release search condition was reasonable

Defendant’s supervised release unobjected to search condition is reviewed for plain error and found reasonable from his criminal history. United States v. Oseguera, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4350 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2020).* Giving deference to the state court affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Unobjected to supervised release search condition was reasonable

MA: Probation search of cell phone photo app was reasonable; could be used in a subsequent prosecution

Defendant’s probation search of a photo app on his cell phone that revealed child pornography and led to a search warrant of his residence was reasonable. The product of all the searches was admissible against him in a subsequent criminal … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on MA: Probation search of cell phone photo app was reasonable; could be used in a subsequent prosecution

CA4: 4A doesn’t require a particular statement of the crime under investigation if it otherwise adequately describes the place to be search or the person or thing to be seized

“More fundamentally, we think that the premise of Blakeney’s argument — that a search warrant always must specify the crime for which the executing officers may seek evidence – is mistaken. The Fourth Amendment ‘specifies only two matters that must … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA4: 4A doesn’t require a particular statement of the crime under investigation if it otherwise adequately describes the place to be search or the person or thing to be seized

CA6: Probation search justified by two drug arrests and posting $125k bond with no job

Defendant’s probation search condition permitted the search here, and officers had reason: He was arrested twice for drug offenses and posted $125,000 in bond despite having no apparent source of income. United States v. Tucker, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 3264 … Continue reading

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Probation search justified by two drug arrests and posting $125k bond with no job

Cal.: Mid-trial objection to question based on lack of PC for search was untimely objection to the search

A mid-trial objection to evidence on the ground there was no probable cause for the police action in the search was untimely. It can only be brought during trial if the facts weren’t known until then, and that’s not what … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Motion to suppress, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.: Mid-trial objection to question based on lack of PC for search was untimely objection to the search

OH2: Putting wrong city of bank robbery in affidavit was mere clerical error that could be overlooked

There was probable cause on the totality of the information provided the issuing magistrate for issuance of a search warrant for bank robber. The error as to the city of the robbery was a mere clerical error that could be … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH2: Putting wrong city of bank robbery in affidavit was mere clerical error that could be overlooked

M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

Merely being a CI for the police doesn’t make the CI a participant in the crime to make his or her identity subject to disclosure. United States v. Westbrook, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10563 (M.D. La. Jan. 22, 2020). The … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Merely being a CI doesn’t make the CI a “participant” in the crime for disclosure

CT: No REP in jail letter to def’s mother with admission

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights weren’t violated by corrections officers copying a letter to his mother with an admission then turning it over to law enforcement officers. He had no privacy interest in his mail that society would recognize. The claim … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CT: No REP in jail letter to def’s mother with admission