Category Archives: Probation / Parole search

AL: SW to “any law enforcement officer ” in the state can be directed to one from a different county than the place of the search

A search warrant to “any law enforcement officer ” in the state can be directed to one from a different county than the place of the search. When defendant admitted that he had child pornography on the computer at his … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL: SW to “any law enforcement officer ” in the state can be directed to one from a different county than the place of the search

E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

Defendant’s car was parked on a Waffle House parking lot from 2-5 am with the headlights on, and it was reasonable for officers to check on the car. Inside was defendant who didn’t respond to them, and it was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches

“Cell phones provide access to an immense array of private information, much of which is stored in the Cloud or on sites controlled by third parties. As such, the United States Supreme Court concluded in Riley v. California that people … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AZ: Cell phones are “property” subject to probation searches

OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown. State v. Hall, 2020-Ohio-2937, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 1913 (5th Dist. May 15, 2020).* Replica of Glover: State v. Anglin, 2020-Ohio-2907, 2020 Ohio … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH5: Walking down the middle of the street at night in a high crime area justified a patdown

TX: State statutory requirement of legible magistrate’s signature subject to GFE

Code of Criminal Procedure Article 18.04(5) requires, in part, that a search warrant contain a legible magistrate’s signature. So what effect does an illegible magistrate’s signature have upon the applicability of the statutory good-faith exception? See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on TX: State statutory requirement of legible magistrate’s signature subject to GFE

ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

The fact defendant was on probation was admissible at trial, not as propensity evidence, but to show context for the probation search and why defendant’s underwear was searched. State v. Jones, 2020 Ida. LEXIS 95 (May 4, 2020). Automatic license … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ID: Def’s probationary status was admissible at trial to show context for probation search, not as propensity evidence

N.D.Ga.: Def doesn’t show that his guilty plea was unknowing as a result of IAC on a 4A claim

“The movant’s unsubstantiated claim that counsel’s mistakes on a Fourth Amendment issue somehow rendered his guilty plea unknowing are insufficient to overcome a record that reflects that the plea was knowing and voluntary.” Hernandez-Rodriguez v. United States, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, SCOTUS | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def doesn’t show that his guilty plea was unknowing as a result of IAC on a 4A claim

CA6: While federal law requires RS for a supervised release search, it wasn’t error for district court here to permit suspicionless searches

District court did not plainly err in imposing a suspicionless search condition separate from federal law that normally requires reasonable suspicion. United States v. Sulik, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10450 (6th Cir. Mar. 31, 2020). “Nothing in the record suggests … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search, Standards of review | Comments Off on CA6: While federal law requires RS for a supervised release search, it wasn’t error for district court here to permit suspicionless searches

D.Conn.: Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was RS and justified its search

Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was a violation of defendant’s probation and provided reasonable suspicion for a search of the phone. Aside from the legitimate reasons for having a smartphone, “[c]onsidering that a smartphone is often used as an instrumentality … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Possession of an unauthorized smartphone was RS and justified its search

CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

Trash pulls by police are not unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, notwithstanding a local ordinance that limits trash collectors to rummaging in trash. United States v. Mathis, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 10275 (6th Cir. Mar. 30, 2020). Defendant’s probation search … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: Trash pulls not unreasonable despite local ordinance that only trash collectors permitted in trash

SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week

SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week includes: Hamm v. Tennessee19-1059Issue: Whether police violate the Fourth Amendment when they conduct a suspicionless search of a probationer’s home.

Posted in Probation / Parole search, SCOTUS | Comments Off on SCOTUSBlog: Petitions of the week

CO: Cell phone SW is particular if it gives just the phone number and expected owner’s name

A cell phone search warrant is sufficiently particular by identifying merely the phone number and the expected owner of the phone. People v. Pettigrew, 2020 COA 46, 2020 Colo. App. LEXIS 656 (Mar. 26, 2020). Defense counsel didn’t fail to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CO: Cell phone SW is particular if it gives just the phone number and expected owner’s name

M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

A delay of seven weeks for seeking a search warrant for a cell phone already validly seized wasn’t unreasonable. Several cases approved long delays, and this is near the outer limit, but still valid. United States v. Butler, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probation / Parole search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Seven week delay for SW for cell phone validly seized wasn’t unreasonable

M.D.N.C.: Two SWs were issued, and second did not supersede the first

Two search warrants were issued May 28 & 29, 2019. They were both issued with probable cause, they weren’t stale, and the second did not supersede the first. No case supports this latter argument. United States v. Atkins, 2020 U.S. … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on M.D.N.C.: Two SWs were issued, and second did not supersede the first

NC: State fails to show need for satellite based monitoring of sex offender who won’t be released from prison until 2032

The state fails to show the need for constant satellite based monitoring for defendant convicted sex offender who won’t even be released from prison until 2032. State v. Gordon, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 205 (Mar. 17, 2020):

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on NC: State fails to show need for satellite based monitoring of sex offender who won’t be released from prison until 2032

CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

Even if the supervised release search here was without reasonable suspicion, the purposes of the exclusionary rule aren’t served. “Even assuming [Officer] Dyckman acted unreasonably in failing to conduct further investigation before executing the search, this is not the kind … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA2: Even assuming this supervised release search lacked RS, there were facts supporting it and the exclusionary rule will not be applied

OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

The trial court’s grant of suppression is reversed and remanded because of its inadequate findings of fact and conclusions of law for appellate review. State v. Peeks, 2020-Ohio-889, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 812 (10th Dist. Mar. 10, 2020). Defendant officers … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH10: Lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law on grant of suppression motion requires remand to make them

OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

The court sustains a nighttime search warrant based solely on the fact that there were some sales of drugs from the house without specifying the time, and that it was “urgent” that the raid happen now for drugs, potential weapons, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nighttime search, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on OH2: Nighttime SW approved essentially just because police wanted to search ASAP

NC: 30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable

30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable under Grady v. North Carolina and subsequent state cases. State v. Griffin, 2020 N.C. App. LEXIS 139 (Feb. 18, 2020). The trial court credited the officer’s testimony … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: 30 years of satellite based monitoring of this convicted sex offender was unreasonable

CA9: Unobjected to supervised release search condition was reasonable

Defendant’s supervised release unobjected to search condition is reviewed for plain error and found reasonable from his criminal history. United States v. Oseguera, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 4350 (9th Cir. Feb. 10, 2020).* Giving deference to the state court affidavit … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Unobjected to supervised release search condition was reasonable