Category Archives: Plain view, feel, smell

DE: Facebook messages def was reselling MMJ was part of the PC

A medical marijuana provider told police that it appeared that defendant was reselling that which she acquired legally. They messaged her through Facebook as a potential buyer, and she essentially admitted it. The search warrant was issued on probable cause … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on DE: Facebook messages def was reselling MMJ was part of the PC

CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

The officers here saw a sawed off shotgun through the windows of defendant’s van, and it was not unreasonable to use the key fob to open the door to seize it. State v. Ortiz, 2018 Conn. App. LEXIS 235 (June … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CT: Seeing sawed off shotgun through van window justified opening it up to seize it

E.D.Mich.: Gant didn’t bar a plain view of the interior of def’s car when he was handcuffed on ground

Defendant was arrested for drug dealing, and he was handcuffed on the ground near the car. The search of the car here was based on seeing a gun in the car in plain view, so Gant doesn’t bar the search. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Gant didn’t bar a plain view of the interior of def’s car when he was handcuffed on ground

NJ: Officer’s purpose in momentarily putting head in window of car was to hear def over road noise was not search; plain smell sustained

The officer momentarily put his head in the window of defendant’s car to better hear him, and then he smelled marijuana. The purpose of the intrusion was benign and not to conduct a search, and it was not unreasonable. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on NJ: Officer’s purpose in momentarily putting head in window of car was to hear def over road noise was not search; plain smell sustained

VA: Gun in plain view left in car was seizable under Long

Defendant fled from a car, and a gun was in plain view in the car. The officer acted reasonably in searching the car to secure the firearm under Michigan v. Long [aside from abandonment of the car] because defendant could … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep | Comments Off on VA: Gun in plain view left in car was seizable under Long

AZ: Trial court didn’t make finding on Strickland IAC prejudice for failure to argue curtilage; remanded

Defense counsel deliberatedly didn’t make a claim officers violated curtilage in their initial entry to defendant’s property. The first search warrant application was rejected by one judge. The affidavit was redrafted with additional facts and presented to a second judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on AZ: Trial court didn’t make finding on Strickland IAC prejudice for failure to argue curtilage; remanded

N.D.Tex.: PV of short-barreled rifle and silencer was valid; incriminating nature immediately apparent

The incriminating nature of a short-barreled rifle and a homemade suppressor was immediately apparent for plain view purposes. United States v. Tidrow, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81807 (N.D. Tex. May 15, 2018). “Prior to the stop of the vehicle, law … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: PV of short-barreled rifle and silencer was valid; incriminating nature immediately apparent

WY: Patdown led to plain feel of drugs in watch pocket

During a patdown, the officer felt what was likely drugs in the “coin pocket” (called a watch pocket) and it was immediately apparent to him. Therefore, plain feel applied. Maestas v. State, 2018 WY 47, 2018 Wyo. LEXIS 49 (May … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on WY: Patdown led to plain feel of drugs in watch pocket

W.D.Okla.: SW for vehicles and “appurtenances” didn’t include a car and camper 100′ from house off the curtilage

The search warrant for defendant’s dwelling included vehicles and “appurtenances” on the land. Defendant’s vehicle and camper were about 100′ from the dwelling, and the court finds they were not on the curtilage of the dwelling. Moreover, the good faith … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: SW for vehicles and “appurtenances” didn’t include a car and camper 100′ from house off the curtilage

S.D.N.Y.: Envelopes seen in plain view during arrest suggested drug proceeds and was valid plain view

Officers had an arrest warrant and took defendant into custody. A protective sweep was done and plain view observations were made, including cash in envelopes. The plain view, but without mention of the cash, was used to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Envelopes seen in plain view during arrest suggested drug proceeds and was valid plain view

E.D.Ky.: A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned

A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned. United States v. Green, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75738 (E.D. Ky. May 4, 2018). The police had a search warrant for animal fighting for the dogs and papers for … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: A cell phone left in an abandoned car is also abandoned

PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

The trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law were completely wrong. Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy concerning his jail calls made over a television monitor and through a computer system. This was a case of consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on PA: Def consented to recordings of jail calls, and this is an exception to the state wiretap statute

D.Neb.: The gov’t put def on notice standing was an issue, and def didn’t respond with proof; no standing

The government argued no standing. “Despite being on notice that standing was an issue, Defendant did not introduce evidence at the suppression hearing to establish his relationship to the property searched in this case.” Going to the merits anyway, defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Neb.: The gov’t put def on notice standing was an issue, and def didn’t respond with proof; no standing

W.D.N.C.: 2255 is not the place to first litigate a suppression motion

2255 petitioner can’t raise his search and seizure claim via post-conviction relief where there was no effort to pursue the issue in the case on the merits. Even if he could, he’d lose on the merits of the search because … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: 2255 is not the place to first litigate a suppression motion

MS: “Catch all” phrase in SW that permitted seizure of that which was found in plain view was merely a restatement of the plain view doctrine

A “catch all” phrase that permitted seizure of that which was found in the course of a valid search was merely a restatement of the plain view doctrine, and that doesn’t justify suppression. Defendant’s other scope of search claim was … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on MS: “Catch all” phrase in SW that permitted seizure of that which was found in plain view was merely a restatement of the plain view doctrine

AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor

The search authorization was valid for text messages between defendant and a supposed 14-year-old girl. The AFOSI investigator found child pornography in what was thus found to be plain view. Even if, arguendo, the officer was looking for child pornography, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on AF: Inevitable discovery validated finding CP while looking for text messages with minor

W.D.N.Y.: SW was for drugs; a gun found was in plain view

The search warrant was for drugs and a gun was found. Guns are instruments of the drug trade. The warrant otherwise being valid, the finding of the gun was essentially in plain view. United States v. Pizarro, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: SW was for drugs; a gun found was in plain view

OH12: 911 call about OD permitted seizure of drugs and paraphernalia in plain view

Officers responded to a 911 call about an overdose. When they got in the house, drugs and paraphernalia were in plain view, and they could be seized. State v. Pettiford, 2018-Ohio-1015, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1073 (12th Dist. Mar 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH12: 911 call about OD permitted seizure of drugs and paraphernalia in plain view

TN: After def’s arrest for assault with a knife, the apparent weapon was seen in plain view in def’s car

Defendant had been arrested after a stop for aggravated assault with a knife. When the officer looked in the car to secure it, he saw a knife in plain view, and its seizure was reasonable. State v. Stanley, 2018 Tenn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: After def’s arrest for assault with a knife, the apparent weapon was seen in plain view in def’s car

OH8: A pill bottle search wasn’t plain view during execution of SW for firearms

The police had a search warrant for firearms, and, during execution of the warrant, the officers looked in a pill bottle. The state’s plain view argument is unavailing because it wasn’t immediately apparent to the officers. “We further find little … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Overseizure, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on OH8: A pill bottle search wasn’t plain view during execution of SW for firearms