MS: “Catch all” phrase in SW that permitted seizure of that which was found in plain view was merely a restatement of the plain view doctrine

A “catch all” phrase that permitted seizure of that which was found in the course of a valid search was merely a restatement of the plain view doctrine, and that doesn’t justify suppression. Defendant’s other scope of search claim was waived by not presenting it to the trial court. Jones v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 142 (Mar. 27, 2018).

Claim that defendant’s cell phone was searched without a warrant wasn’t presented to the trial court and can’t be raised on appeal. Britton v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 139 (Mar. 27, 2018).*

There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant based on statements of children that defendant had shown them pictures of other naked children. Lowe v. State, 2018 Miss. App. LEXIS 141 (Mar. 27, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.