Category Archives: Informant hearsay

ID: Officer writing ticket providing backup to drug dog abandoned traffic ticket making it a criminal investigation; suppressed

The officer’s delaying of the traffic stop for 2½ minutes while performing a back-up function for a drug dog sweep violated defendant’s rights under the Fourth Amendment, because the seizure, initially valid based on a cracked windshield, became unreasonable after … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ID: Officer writing ticket providing backup to drug dog abandoned traffic ticket making it a criminal investigation; suppressed

NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

Noting a split in authorities, the court finds that the smell of marijuana in the passenger compartment [here, coming off the rental agreement] does not give probable cause to search the trunk. Here, however, the trunk was accessible from the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY co.ct.: Noting split in case law, slight smell of MJ in the passenger compartment generally doesn’t justify a search of the trunk; here, however, trunk accessible from inside car

TN: Off-duty police officer was citizen informant on DUI call

An off-duty police officer saw defendant appeared drunk in her car in a Sonic parking lot and called it in. He was a citizen informant. State v. Irwin, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 841 (Nov. 8, 2016). The search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Immigration checkpoints, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: Off-duty police officer was citizen informant on DUI call

IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

Defendant was charged with illegally harvesting ginseng based on a search warrant that lacked a proper showing of informant hearsay with no showing of basis of knowledge or why it would be believable or should be credited. Turning to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on IN: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge and reason to believe him was a failure of PC and GFE

Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

Anonymous report of man with a gun in a car led to defendant’s stop, and the court finds it insufficient under Navarette because there was no allegation of a crime. People v. Mansapit, 2016 Guam 30, 2016 Guam LEXIS 28 … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on Guam: Anonymous report of man in car with gun didn’t satisfy Navarette

OR: Mail recipient has a possessory interest in mail in transit; removing it from mail stream for dog sniff was unreasonable (under state constitution)

A US mail recipient has a constitutionally protected privacy interest in the package in transit under the Oregon Constitution, looking to Ex parte Jackson (1877). The package was effectively and unlawfully seized at the Portland airport mail facility for separate … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Mail recipient has a possessory interest in mail in transit; removing it from mail stream for dog sniff was unreasonable (under state constitution)

N.D.Ga.: Def’s stop on PC for drugs permitted Gant SI of the car

The officer had probable cause to stop and detain defendant for delivery of drugs based on the CI’s story coming together when defendant arrived. Therefore, the Gant search incident of the car for drugs was reasonable. United States v. Baskin, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Def’s stop on PC for drugs permitted Gant SI of the car

WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant

WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant by Joe Davidson: There’s an unfortunate saying on the street: Snitches get stitches. Turns out some get paid, too, sometimes very, very well. Consider this from a new report on … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WaPo: Want to make a million? Become a DEA informant

TX: Anonymous tip was corroborated at the scene by officers for RS

An anonymous tip brought police to where defendant was, and their observations corroborated the tip sufficient to support reasonable suspicion. Furr v. State, 2016 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1094 (Sept. 21, 2016) (dissent):

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX: Anonymous tip was corroborated at the scene by officers for RS

NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

Defendant’s failure to produce his registration and proof of insurance during a traffic stop didn’t give the officer justification to search the center console for it himself. Thus, defense counsel was ineffective for not raising this issue. State v. Howl, … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NM: Driver’s failure to produce proof of registration and insurance doesn’t permit search of console

DE: When state shows PC in forfeiture proceeding, burden shifts to def

This case involves a return of property petition and the state sought forfeiture. The probable cause standard for forfeiture is essentially the same at that applied in Fourth Amendment search and seizure cases. Thus, the State is required to prove … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Forfeiture, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on DE: When state shows PC in forfeiture proceeding, burden shifts to def

N.D.W.Va.: CI’s tale about another’s safety is entitled to greater weight

Defendant argued that the officer’s use of “several firearms” cases in the affidavit for the search warrant was misleading under Franks. Since “several” means, essentially, more than one and not too many, and defendant’s priors aren’t yet firmly known, this … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: CI’s tale about another’s safety is entitled to greater weight

N.D.Cal.: Def’s probation cell phone search was justified

Because of defendant’s arrest, his probation officers had a great interest in searching his cell phone as a probation search. His arrest showed that he likely wasn’t complying with the law. United States v. Harding, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119276 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Def’s probation cell phone search was justified

MA: That CI’s tip in another case wasn’t good enough doesn’t say much about this one where it was more detailed and better corroborated

The CI’s tip here was detailed and substantially corroborated. As to the CI’s track record, a search was suppressed on his information after this one occurred, but that doesn’t ipso facto impugn his credibility. In the other case, the CI’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Search, Standing | Comments Off on MA: That CI’s tip in another case wasn’t good enough doesn’t say much about this one where it was more detailed and better corroborated

ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

The great detail about the CI with its corroboration was probable cause. The inclusion of the CI’s criminal history doesn’t ipso facto undermine the probable cause, and the reviewing court is obliged to give deference to the issuing court’s probable … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on ME: Great detail supported the CI’s statement; inclusion of CI’s criminal history didn’t undermine PC

S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

The description “child pornography” is enough for the affidavit for a CP search warrant–the pictures themselves don’t have to be attached to prove it. United States v. Weatherman, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104878 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 9, 2016). Based on … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Child porn SW affidavit doesn’t need pictures attached: a description will do

NC: Trial court’s sustaining DUI checkpoint on this record was plain error

The trial court plainly erred in finding the DUI checkpoint was valid under the Brown v. Texas factors. State v. Ashworth, 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 816 (Aug. 2, 2016). Greatly detailed “innocent details” from the CI were corroborated, and that … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: Trial court’s sustaining DUI checkpoint on this record was plain error

W.D.Mo.: Officers’ own observations corroborated CI’s

There clearly was probable cause drugs, money, and firearms would be found at the place searched. “The affidavit provided the statements of a confidential source who specifically described drug trafficking activities there. These statements included the CS’s very recent eyewitness … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Officers’ own observations corroborated CI’s

E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

The tipster provided only easily known public information, but for the fact defendant sat in his car and smoked marijuana during his lunch breaks. Police watched him and he didn’t do that. Because the police never corroborated the one observable … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal

The CI’s information defendant would be delivering crack cocaine to a specific apartment complex and an officer’s personal observations of defendant arriving there and engaging in what appeared to be a drug deal were sufficient to create reasonable suspicion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal