N.D.W.Va.: CI’s tale about another’s safety is entitled to greater weight

Defendant argued that the officer’s use of “several firearms” cases in the affidavit for the search warrant was misleading under Franks. Since “several” means, essentially, more than one and not too many, and defendant’s priors aren’t yet firmly known, this isn’t false or misleading. The CIs were, inferentially, known to the officers in the affidavit for the search warrant, and the affidavit as a whole showed probable cause. “In addition, an informant who has a personal interest in another’s safety can be afforded heightened reliability, because ‘personal interest can create “a strong motive to supply accurate information.”’” United States v. Thomas, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117892 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 1, 2016).

Defense counsel did, in fact, move to suppress evidence and that issue lost on appeal. Rodriguez v. United States, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117450 (E.D.Tex. Aug. 4, 2016),* adopted, COA denied, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116663 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 30, 2016).*

“She also freely granted consent for the agents to review her cell phone information.” United States v. Stein, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117573 (W.D.La. July 13, 2016),* adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116954 (W.D. La., Aug. 26, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.