Category Archives: Automobile exception

PA: Syringes in plain view on floorboard was PC

Officer’s seeing syringes on the floor of defendant’s car just by looking was plain view and probable cause for search. Commonwealth v. Bumbarger, 2020 Pa. Super. LEXIS 206 (Mar. 16, 2020).* “Mr. Sealey’s motion to suppress, the court did not … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Syringes in plain view on floorboard was PC

MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and he had a cell phone in his pocket that he was using, his younger brother’s. The seizure of the phone was proper, but the purported inventory of the phone was not because … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Inventory | Comments Off on MA: Purported inventory of cell phone was investigative and unreasonable

OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

Police had probable cause to stop defendant on his way to a controlled buy. This did not qualify as a “police-created exigency.” State v. Colman-Pinning, 302 Ore. App. 383 (Feb. 26, 2020). Appellant “seeks appellate relief based on a single … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Automobile exception | Comments Off on OR: Def’s driving to a controlled buy was PC for automobile exception; not a “police-created exigency”

N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers. In addition: “Here, Patrolmen Link and McClamroch had received information that a retaliatory shooting could occur near the location they stopped … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Ineffective assistance, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: An open container in a car is probable cause under the automobile exception to search for other open containers

TX11: Automobile exception doesn’t permit a vehicle search after the object of the search has been recovered

The automobile exception did not apply where defendant was stopped for an alleged theft and the property was recovered before the search occurred, thereby obviating it. State v. Whitman, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1481 (Tex. App. – Eastland Feb. 21, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on TX11: Automobile exception doesn’t permit a vehicle search after the object of the search has been recovered

E.D.Ky.: Def’s felony drug arrest after a patdown on RS of fleeing justified search of his car

Defendant was being watched by police, and he was being followed and ran a stop sign. In the stop, the officer told defendant to roll down his window and turn off the car. He rolled the window part way down … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Def’s felony drug arrest after a patdown on RS of fleeing justified search of his car

OR: Automobile exception still applies; availability of telephonic warrants doesn’t obviate it

Oregon passes on an invitation to impose a warrant requirement on all vehicle searches just because telephonic warrants should make them required in every case. The automobile exception applies, and the state did not have to show the realistic probability … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on OR: Automobile exception still applies; availability of telephonic warrants doesn’t obviate it

E.D.Mich.: Despite MMJ law, def rolling a joint when stopped could have his car searched

When defendant was stopped, he was seen rolling a joint. Despite the medical marijuana law, the officer could search the car for more because it was still a violation of federal law. United States v. Hinds, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Despite MMJ law, def rolling a joint when stopped could have his car searched

FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

In defendant’s original appeal, appellate counsel argued only that the search incident doctrine applied and he failed on that issue. On post-conviction, however, new counsel argued that the automobile exception should have been argued and that it did not apply … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on FL5: Appellate counsel in direct appeal was ineffective for not arguing automobile exception wasn’t applicable; if it had been argued, court would have reversed

W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

An open container in a car doesn’t grant the police the authority to search the entire vehicle for another open container. It is implausible to believe that another would be found outside of the passenger compartment. United States v. Thomas, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Search incident | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: An open container doesn’t permit a search of an entire car under automobile exception or search incident

LA5: There is no separate exigency requirement for the trunk of a car under the AE

There is no separate exigency requirement for the search of an automobile’s trunk then a need to get a search warrant. The trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress. State v. Lacrosse, 2020 La. App. LEXIS 51 (La. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on LA5: There is no separate exigency requirement for the trunk of a car under the AE

D.Utah: Unlatching but not opening car door to look inside then shutting it was attenuated from dog sniff that gave PC

Officers unlatched the door of a suspicious car parked on an cul-de-sac away from houses, and the car was suspected of a theft from a Sam’s store. The door was shut without looking inside and then a drug dog was … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Automobile exception, Dog sniff | Comments Off on D.Utah: Unlatching but not opening car door to look inside then shutting it was attenuated from dog sniff that gave PC

SC: Automobile exception search doesn’t have to happen right away

Defendant’s car was well enough connected to him and the crime that the police had probable cause for a search under the automobile exception. Moreover, there is no constitutional requirement that the vehicle be searched immediately under the automobile exception. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Pretext | Comments Off on SC: Automobile exception search doesn’t have to happen right away

CA9: Immigration arrest valid on “reason to believe” this person was an alien illegally in the U.S.

BIA petitioner’s rights were not violated because she can’t show her arrest was an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment. “The fact that agents detained and arrested Echeverria without first establishing her identity and alienage is of no moment. All … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Immigration arrests, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA9: Immigration arrest valid on “reason to believe” this person was an alien illegally in the U.S.

IN: Seizure of def’s vehicle off the street when police found it after a hit and run was valid under the automobile exception

“P1 Following a May 2017 hit and run in Indianapolis that left a pedestrian dead, Dennis Payne Jr. was convicted of Level 5 felony failure to remain at the scene of an accident resulting in death and Level 6 felony … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on IN: Seizure of def’s vehicle off the street when police found it after a hit and run was valid under the automobile exception

IL: The scope of consent to search a car was exceeded, but it was because PC had developed

Officers exceeded the scope of defendant’s consent, but, by the time they did, they had probable cause under the automobile exception to search further. People v. Davis, 2019 IL App (1st) 160408, 2019 Ill. App. LEXIS 875 (Sept. 23, 2019),* … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on IL: The scope of consent to search a car was exceeded, but it was because PC had developed

N.D.Iowa: There was no RS as to def who was talking with another for whom there was; def should have been allowed to leave

When one defendant wanted to leave the encounter with the police, there was no reasonable suspicion for his patdown and he should have been allowed to leave without the patdown. United States v. Steffens, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190597 (N.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was no RS as to def who was talking with another for whom there was; def should have been allowed to leave

KY: Illegal cell phone search is harmless where nothing used at trial from the phones

The apparently unconstitutional searches of defendant’s cell phones were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt when nothing was used from them. Ward v. Commonwealth, 2019 Ky. LEXIS 433 (Oct. 31, 2019).* In defendant’s traffic stop for not stopping at the stop … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on KY: Illegal cell phone search is harmless where nothing used at trial from the phones

GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

The reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room expires with the checkout time. Lindsey v. State, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Oct. 29, 2019). The defendant officers were properly entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff’s excessive force claim. Also, … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on GA: REP in a hotel room expires at checkout time

OH8: SW was for all of a multifamily dwelling, only one unit was occupied; it was particular

The search warrant referred to the premises to be searched as “5243/45 Broadway.” It was one continuous apartment downstairs with one address, and the other upstairs was still being built and was occupied. 5243 was used on the search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH8: SW was for all of a multifamily dwelling, only one unit was occupied; it was particular