Category Archives: Standing

D.Del.: Def found on couch in morning with pillow and sheet at friend’s house had standing

“Defendant has adequately demonstrated he has standing to challenge the Search Warrant. … Defendant was found at his brother’s residence around 9:31 a.m., lying on a couch with a sheet and pillow, strongly suggesting that he was an overnight guest … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on D.Del.: Def found on couch in morning with pillow and sheet at friend’s house had standing

CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

Defendant didn’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy (standing) in the movements of a cell phone of another. Still, it was with a warrant, and there is no defect in the warrant process. United States v. Beaudion, 2020 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: No standing or REP in the CSLI of another

KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

“From the initiation of the traffic stop at 3:23 a.m. until the moment when Officer Trout observed drug paraphernalia in plain view next to Lutz, the stop was not measurably extended beyond its basic objective of processing the observed traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on KS: Officer’s delay by seeking backup for safety reasons during nighttime stop where he was outnumbered was reasonable

E.D.Tenn.: Leaving suitcase in an open grassy area is a loss of a REP in it

Defendant left his suitcase in an open grassy area, and that was a waiver any reasonable expectation of privacy in it. See United States v. Wilson, 984 F. Supp. 2d 676 (E.D. Ky. 2013) (leaving suitcase in a cemetery was … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Leaving suitcase in an open grassy area is a loss of a REP in it

IN: Def didn’t show standing in an apartment where his pants were

Defendant failed to show standing in an apartment he had a pair of jeans in where the officer stepped on them during a walk through and felt drugs underfoot. The police responded to a domestic call, and found defendant outside … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on IN: Def didn’t show standing in an apartment where his pants were

W.D.Okla.: A longstanding personal relationship between owner of premises and def didn’t confer standing without guest status

Defendant’s longstanding personal relationship with the owner of the premises searched was insufficient to show standing. He wasn’t a guest. United States v. Brooks, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195402 (W.D. Okla. Oct. 21, 2020):

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: A longstanding personal relationship between owner of premises and def didn’t confer standing without guest status

M.D.Fla.: Borrower of a rental car with a suspended DL has no standing

“Because the Eleventh Circuit has not yet addressed this issue, the Court has carefully considered the reasoning of the Lyle and Bettis cases and concludes, in line with the Second Circuit, that the unlicensed driver of a rental car should … Continue reading →

Posted in Search incident, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Borrower of a rental car with a suspended DL has no standing

N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

Defendant did not have standing under either a bailment theory or joint possession where a drug courier allegedly hauling his meth on a Greyhound bus had the bag unreasonably seized and searched. Defendant wasn’t there observing the courier holding his … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Giving a drug courier a duffel bag doesn’t allow one to retain standing under a bailment or joint possession theory

CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

Plaintiff as a trespasser had no reasonable expectation of privacy to make a Fourth Amendment complaint. “Just as a trespasser has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the property, a trespasser also lacks a possessory interest in the property. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf was a trespasser who had no REP

N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

Defendant lacked standing where he purported to be an overnight guest, but the host said no. United States v. Spencer, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 191102 (N.D. Ala. Sept. 4, 2020), adopted, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190308 (N.D. Ala. Oct. 14, … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Def failed to prove he was an overnight guest with standing

GA: Even if GPS tracker was unconstitutionally placed, it didn’t affect later SW for vehicle

Defendant first claimed the vehicle was his when the officer asked, and he consented to a search of it. After a few loose rounds of ammunition were found, he disavowed ownership. It turned out there was also a tracking device … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Independent source, Standing, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on GA: Even if GPS tracker was unconstitutionally placed, it didn’t affect later SW for vehicle

MA: Def’s arrest in car with others didn’t remove safety factor of search for firearm

Defendant’s arrest didn’t remove the safety factor because there were others in the vehicle who could access a potential weapon. Therefore, the search for the weapon was reasonable. Commonwealth v. Silvelo, 2020 Mass. LEXIS 647 (Oct. 14, 2020). Defendant filed … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MA: Def’s arrest in car with others didn’t remove safety factor of search for firearm

N.D.Ill.: Def had standing to challenge search of a garage of another he was using and had exclusive control over at the time

“Perez has provided enough evidence to show that, at the time of the search, he had control over the Dakin garage and the ability to exclude others from it. He was storing materials there, there was no one else on … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Def had standing to challenge search of a garage of another he was using and had exclusive control over at the time

CA9: No standing to sue to enjoin future border searches of cell phones

Plaintiff cannot obtain prospective injunctive relief against future border cell phone searches because he lacks standing for future searches. As to past searches, he cannot obtain injunctive relief after suing under the FTCA. “Under FTCA’s judgment bar, ‘once a plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: No standing to sue to enjoin future border searches of cell phones

MI: Def’s employer’s ownership of cell phone is only a factor in REP and standing; remanded

The trial court erred in finding defendant had no standing in the cell phone he had that belonged to his employer. Ownership of the phone is only one factor in standing. People v. Paul, 2020 Mich. App. LEXIS 6637 (Oct. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Standing | Comments Off on MI: Def’s employer’s ownership of cell phone is only a factor in REP and standing; remanded

CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA

“The central question here is whether Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screening personnel, known as Transportation Security Officers (TSOs), satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer. Holding that they do, we reverse and remand.” “Two of our … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA

D.P.R.: Def retained REP in backpack he stored in a car he wasn’t riding in

Defendant retained a reasonable expectation of privacy in a backpack that he placed in a car that he wasn’t in when it was searched. “The following circumstances established that the defendant possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy in the briefcase: … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Def retained REP in backpack he stored in a car he wasn’t riding in

E.D.Pa.: Guest who intended to spend the night had standing

Defendant had standing to contest a search of premises he was visiting and anticipated spending the night. He loses on the merits by his consent. United States v. Mack, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 152664 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 24, 2020). Defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Guest who intended to spend the night had standing

CA5: “I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle” is a disavowal of standing

“Rather than establishing an expectation of privacy, Beasley expressly disavowed ownership of the vehicle, saying, ‘I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle.’ Because he disclaimed ownership of the vehicle, the district court appropriately determined that Beasley lacked any expectation of … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: “I don’t know, it’s not my vehicle” is a disavowal of standing

E.D.N.Y.: Lack of a DL doesn’t deny standing in a borrowed car

Defendant had standing to challenge the stop and search of a car he’d borrowed with permission of the owner despite the lack of a driver’s license, but he loses on the merits. United States v. Zimmerman, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Private search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Lack of a DL doesn’t deny standing in a borrowed car