Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

CA8: When a gun is seized in a business, govt must show justification; here it failed to show officer safety was an issue. A gun on a shelf in a business is not exigency per se.

An undercover officer entered a tattoo parlor looking for a “person of interest” in an unrelated case. A gun was seen on a shelf in the “work area.” Officers came back. Customers were allowed in the “work area” by invitation … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on CA8: When a gun is seized in a business, govt must show justification; here it failed to show officer safety was an issue. A gun on a shelf in a business is not exigency per se.

D.R.I.: Warrantless ping of def’s cell phone was based on exigency of threatened suicide

Defendant sent texts suggesting he’d commit suicide rather than go to prison for child pornography, something he’d been involved with before. The officers had exigent circumstances to have his cell phone pinged to find him. There was a factual dispute … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.R.I.: Warrantless ping of def’s cell phone was based on exigency of threatened suicide

NJ: Waiting for a SW isn’t exigency to enter a home, but that wasn’t clearly established in 2008 for § 1983 purposes

In 2008, officers entered and seized plaintiff’s home while waiting for a search warrant. In a § 1983 and N.J. Civil Rights Act case, it was not clearly established at the time that that was unreasonable. He gets qualified immunity, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NJ: Waiting for a SW isn’t exigency to enter a home, but that wasn’t clearly established in 2008 for § 1983 purposes

OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

The emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress. Here it was cattle. State v. Hershey, 286 Ore. App. 824, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 907 (July 19, 2017). There was plenty of probable cause, but defendant’s Franks argument that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Emergency aid exception applies to animals in distress

M.D.La.: Any exigency ended with def’s arrest; no facts showed others present

Any exigency involving defendant in his house evaporated when he was arrested and handcuffed. The mere possibility others are present can be exigency, but it requires pointing to actual facts, not possibilities. The court credits defendant’s own testimony damaging to … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Staleness | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Any exigency ended with def’s arrest; no facts showed others present

NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

The trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress for the nonattendance of its police witnesses after they were subpoenaed but didn’t show. The state sought an adjournment which the trial court denied. It was the first request for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on NY4: Not granting a continuance of suppression hearing for unavailable witnesses was an abuse of discretion

MD: A local humane society can seize animals in distress by delegation under state statute but only with exigency

A local humane society can seize animals in distress by delegation under state statute but only with exigency and only to the extent necessary to protect the animal. Rohrer v. Humane Soc’y of Washington Cty., 2017 Md. LEXIS 456 (June … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on MD: A local humane society can seize animals in distress by delegation under state statute but only with exigency

RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

The person asked for consent didn’t live there, and the officers made no attempt to find out whether she did. They just assumed she did. The state’s alternative argument of exigency is rejected because the officers never testified to any … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on RI: No apparent authority to consent shown; police merely assumed consenter lived there, but she didn’t

CA9: LAPD’s and California’s 30 day vehicle impoundment policy violates 4A

LAPD’s and the State of California’s policy of requiring all impounded vehicles be held 30 days violates the Fourth Amendment. Plaintiff loaned her car to her brother-in-law who was arrested for a suspended license, and the car was impounded. She … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA9: LAPD’s and California’s 30 day vehicle impoundment policy violates 4A

CA8: Def retreating from a threshold arrest creates exigency

Defendant came to the doorway of his camper to be arrested, but he “retreated” and turned to go back inside with the officer still holding on to him. A look for a gun, finding one, was reasonable under Santana. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA8: Def retreating from a threshold arrest creates exigency

NE: Evidence of a recent burglary justifies entry on exigency

“Courts generally find sufficient exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless entry into a home when a police officer reasonably believes that a burglary is in progress or was recently committed therein. A burglary indicates an immediate need to secure the … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NE: Evidence of a recent burglary justifies entry on exigency

CA9: Exigency supported entry into hotel room when there was another child inside in child sex exploitation case

Defense counsel was not ineffective. The search of defendant’s hotel room for evidence in a child sex exploitation case after she escaped from the room and talked to the police was based on exigency. “ The officers also had exigent … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Search incident | Comments Off on CA9: Exigency supported entry into hotel room when there was another child inside in child sex exploitation case

OH9: Potential working meth lab was exigency for entry

Officer’s seeing meth through window and then bottles used for making meth suggested making methamphetamine which is recognized as an exigency. State v. Secriskey, 2017-Ohio-4169, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2217 (9th Dist. June 7, 2017). Defendant gets limited discovery of … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH9: Potential working meth lab was exigency for entry

N.D.Ala.: Nailed down plywood sheet wasn’t subject to removal under protective sweep but other exigency for search shown

Police entered because of a hostage situation. Removal of a nailed down plywood cover wasn’t valid as a protective sweep, but it was under exigent circumstances. United States v. Cooks, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83992 (N.D.Ala. April 28, 2017), adopted, … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Nailed down plywood sheet wasn’t subject to removal under protective sweep but other exigency for search shown

VT: SWs for animals are different than for other property; more likely subject to exigency

Search warrants for animals are different than for other property in that they are alive and more likely subject to exigent circumstances because animal welfare is always a consideration. When executing a warrant for two animals, others apparently in distress … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Scope of search | Comments Off on VT: SWs for animals are different than for other property; more likely subject to exigency

N.D.W.Va.: Officers arrived at an injured person call, and the assailant wasn’t around; protective sweep permissible

“Here, the officers arrived to a chaotic scene. The Defendant was severely injured after being hit by a bottle. There were at least two other individuals present. The Police were told the assailant, who had demonstrated his violent nature, was … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: Officers arrived at an injured person call, and the assailant wasn’t around; protective sweep permissible

CA1: Police had good reason to know drug dealing before knock and talk; they knocked, heard running, and door was sealed; breaking in was reasonable

Prior to the police coming to the door, they knew that six figures in cash had been removed from the place in a plastic bag. When they knocked, they heard running and the door was sealed shut. “Given the totality … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA1: Police had good reason to know drug dealing before knock and talk; they knocked, heard running, and door was sealed; breaking in was reasonable

IA doesn’t recognize officer’s mistake of law

Defendant was stopped in what was thought to be a county park after midnight, but there was no proof that the park was properly established or had closing hours. Assuming that the officer committed a mistake of law, Iowa does … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA doesn’t recognize officer’s mistake of law

MO: Two week old information in call to child maltreatment hotline was not stale nor without exigency

A call to a child maltreatment hotline was made two weeks after the observation that motivated the phone call. The exigency still existed for a warrantless entry. State v. Prince, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 348 (April 25, 2017). Defendant’s vehicle … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Pretext, Staleness | Comments Off on MO: Two week old information in call to child maltreatment hotline was not stale nor without exigency

CA4: Exigency didn’t justify search of a car for a weapon where there was no threat and no gun crime

Defendant was stopped and arrested on a police call, but it wasn’t for a gun crime. Therefore, because defendant was cooperative and the scene was completely under control and there were no confederates involved, a search of the car for … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on CA4: Exigency didn’t justify search of a car for a weapon where there was no threat and no gun crime