Category Archives: Emergency / exigency

OH2: Furtive movement during knock-and-talk justified entry

Officers entered an apartment building with the consent of one of the tenants when they were investigating a threat with a firearm by one of the tenants. Their knock-and-talk at defendant’s door was reasonable, as was ordering him to open … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Furtive movement during knock-and-talk justified entry

S.D.N.Y.: Strong evidence of ongoing sexual abuse of 13 year old was exigency for warrantless entry

The court finds no consent but probable cause and exigent circumstances from ongoing sexual abuse of a 13 year old girl. “In the analysis that follows, the Court considers the circumstances confronting the officers at the moment they entered Hernandez’s … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Strong evidence of ongoing sexual abuse of 13 year old was exigency for warrantless entry

NY4: Fire started during police standoff was exigency

Starting a fire during a police standoff is an exigent circumstance permitting a police entry after the fire was put out. “The entry and search occurred immediately after firefighters extinguished the fire that defendant had set during a standoff with … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on NY4: Fire started during police standoff was exigency

WV: Domestic disturbance call with injuries justified warrantless entry

Police responded to a domestic disturbance call and found defendant’s wife injured and distraught. They entered the house without an arrest or search warrant to find defendant, and he was in bed. They asked him to show his hands to … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WV: Domestic disturbance call with injuries justified warrantless entry

CA2: Police actions showed warrantless entry wasn’t for emergency purposes sufficient to create jury question

Decedent was a mentally ill veteran who accidentally activated an at home alarm and police responded. He was ultimately shot and police came in, not responding to a wounded man but as a criminal. There was a plausible claim that … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA2: Police actions showed warrantless entry wasn’t for emergency purposes sufficient to create jury question

N.D.Cal.: SW was issued before entry; even if not, emergency justified the entry

“On this record, Reynolds has not shown that the search of his room was illegal. The officers did not enter it until they had a valid warrant. For the sake of completeness, the Court also finds that entering Reynolds’s room … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: SW was issued before entry; even if not, emergency justified the entry

E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

Defendant’s car was parked on a Waffle House parking lot from 2-5 am with the headlights on, and it was reasonable for officers to check on the car. Inside was defendant who didn’t respond to them, and it was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: It was reasonable for officers to open a car door when the driver was parked and unresponsive

MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

A Montana DTF was tipped off to defendant bringing a cache of heroin to a motel to distribute. Officers set up surveillance and recognized local drug dealers coming and going. They called for uniformed backup and attempted a knock-and-talk which … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MT: Knock-and-talk led to forced entry based on exigency of officers being made

VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

Officers had an objectively reasonable basis for an entry and sweep under the emergency aid exception. Defendant was reportedly suicidal, wasn’t communicating at first, and then strange sounds were coming from where he was. “Based on these troubling circumstances, the … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Seizure | Comments Off on VA: Fear of suicide attempt objectively justified warrantless entry as facts developed

LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

“Here, the trial court made credibility determinations based on the testimony of multiple officers involved in defendant’s arrest and found that officers lacked probable cause to search defendant’s residence. Furthermore, observation that defendant’s home had security cameras failed to amount … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on LA: No PC for warrantless entry and security cameras are not exigency

CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

Officers responded to a medical emergency at the entryway of defendant’s house. They ended up conducting a protective sweep for which there was no justification whatsoever. The firearm found in the protective sweep is suppressed. United States v. Gonzalez-Martin, 2020 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Protective sweep of house after medical emergency at front door unjustified

E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

An email search warrant signed by the issuing judge on a tablet with the SignNow app was valid. United States v. Lantzy, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50057 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 24, 2020). “We conclude that the circumstances here were such … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Email SW signed on SignNow app valid

NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

A question about anything on defendant’s person was subject to Quarles public safety exception. “While Defendant was in custody, but before he was advised of his Miranda rights, an officer asked him, ‘Is there anything on your person that I … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on NM: “Is there anything on your person that I should know about?” is subject to Quarles public safety exception

WY: 911 hang-up call from def’s girlfriend and def answered call back volunteering he’d never hit her, with other information, justified warrantless entry

Defendant’s girlfriend made a 911 hang-up call. When 911 called back, defendant answered the phone and volunteered he’d never hit her when she didn’t speak on the first call. Defendant was known to the police to have firearms and possible … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WY: 911 hang-up call from def’s girlfriend and def answered call back volunteering he’d never hit her, with other information, justified warrantless entry

Cal.4d1: Leaving the engine running to one’s car outside house for 30 minutes isn’t exigent circumstances

A neighbor called the police because defendant left his vehicle outside with the engine running for 30 minutes. This did not indicate an emergency justifying a warrantless entry into his casita. There were drugs in plain view. People v. Smith, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.4d1: Leaving the engine running to one’s car outside house for 30 minutes isn’t exigent circumstances

MN: Return of digital copies of attorney’s files seized by SW was only issue and now moot; legality of SW comes later

The attorney here was the target of a search warrant for all her files where the attorney was the suspect, not a client. That distinguishes O’Connor. The parties, the client interveners, and amici have briefed all kinds of constitutional arguments … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MN: Return of digital copies of attorney’s files seized by SW was only issue and now moot; legality of SW comes later

OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

One man under investigation for drug crimes was arrested outside a house when officers went there waiting for him to arrive. On the arrest, officers heard others inside “scurrying around” [how?]. This created exigency and justified a warrantless entry into … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on OH3: Arrest of drug offender coming home outside his house led to officers hearing “scurrying about” inside, and that justified warrantless entry

N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was exigency. “As is evident from the video, the exigency did not terminate due to the passage of time or as a result of [Off.] Sosenko’s attempts to manage the … Continue reading

Posted in Abstention, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: The clear potential for violence in a volatile domestic disturbance was a continuing exigency

IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

A runaway child was not an exigency justifying a warrantless entry into defendant’s home. “Today we must decide if a police officer may enter a third party’s residence without a search warrant based on a verbal request from the Iowa … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IA: Possible presence of runaway 14 yo not exigency for warrantless entry

ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error

The police properly seized defendant’s home to preserve evidence of murder on exigent circumstances. There was also a reasonable protective sweep. Defendant didn’t object to the body cam video that had a refusal to consent to the house search, and … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Emergency / exigency, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on ID: Lack of objection to body cam video showing refusal of consent wasn’t plain error