Category Archives: Consent

ND: Failure to adequately brief a 4A issue is waiver

“While Lindquist makes a conclusory statement that his detention was unlawful, he failed to adequately develop an argument in support of this contention. The district court’s findings have adequate support in the record. ‘Our Court will not consider an argument … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Waiver | Comments Off on ND: Failure to adequately brief a 4A issue is waiver

N.D.W.Va.: GFE applies: “This was no cowboy operation. The agents in this case were extremely careful in the efforts to obtain evidence and to seek multiple warrants.”

There was plenty of probable cause in the 53 page affidavit that recounted all the officers had done and learned in their investigation. “In addition, this Court would again find that the ‘good faith’ exception to the exclusionary rule established … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.W.Va.: GFE applies: “This was no cowboy operation. The agents in this case were extremely careful in the efforts to obtain evidence and to seek multiple warrants.”

D.Neb.: No return of electronic media that had CP on it because def could possibly recover the contraband after erasure

Defendant is not entitled to return of electronic devices and media containing child pornography because of the mere possibility that the contraband could be recovered from it even after erasure. United States v. Buttercase, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125078 (D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on D.Neb.: No return of electronic media that had CP on it because def could possibly recover the contraband after erasure

WI: Officer didn’t have PC for BAC warrant until def was in hospital, and that was exigency

The officer didn’t have justification for a DWI blood warrant when he first arrived on the scene. That came later, and defendant was about to be administered painkillers in the hospital that would have degraded the BAC. There was exigency. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on WI: Officer didn’t have PC for BAC warrant until def was in hospital, and that was exigency

CA6: Lack of notice of right to refuse consent is a factor on totality and not determinative

Defendant wasn’t entitled to notice of his right to refuse consent, and he argues that’s nearly determinative on the totality. It’s not: “So, Taylor’s argument amounts to a contention that, in evaluating the totality of the circumstances, the district court … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Nexus | Comments Off on CA6: Lack of notice of right to refuse consent is a factor on totality and not determinative

E.D.Mich.: Habeas petitioner not arguing defense counsel was told by him that consent was involuntary doesn’t show ineffectiveness for not raising it

2255 petitioner’s failure to argue he told defense counsel that his consent to search was involuntary was fatal to his claim defense counsel was ineffective for not arguing it. United States v. Mitchell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123319 (E.D. Mich. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Habeas petitioner not arguing defense counsel was told by him that consent was involuntary doesn’t show ineffectiveness for not raising it

N.D.Ohio: Patel doesn’t preclude motel operator’s consent

City of Los Angeles v. Patel not violated where motel owner voluntarily gives up information about renters. Jones v. Motel 6 Operating L.P., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122443 (N.D. Ohio July 13, 2020). Defendant’s traffic stop had basic questions that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Patel doesn’t preclude motel operator’s consent

E.D.Ky.: Ruse of police looking for missing child was not voluntary consent to enter

Using a ruse of a missing child to gain entry invalidated the alleged consent. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Turner, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120630 (E.D. Ky. July 9, 2020):

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Ruse of police looking for missing child was not voluntary consent to enter

E.D.Cal.: Facebook posts of def’s wife with gun was PC for SW for residence

Facebook posts of defendant’s wife with a pink assault rifle and a cropped photo of a male holding a gun with face not shown was probable cause to search his residence for firearms. United States v. Walker, 2020 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Facebook posts of def’s wife with gun was PC for SW for residence

OR: Parents’ consent to taking DNA from juvenile wasn’t valid

A juvenile accused of a sex offense also has to consent with his parents to taking a DNA swab. The parent’s consent alone is not enough. In re H. K. D. S., 305 Ore. App. 86, 2020 Ore. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, DNA | Comments Off on OR: Parents’ consent to taking DNA from juvenile wasn’t valid

WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

“We conclude that the incapacitated driver provision is unconstitutional because the implied consent that incapacitated drivers are deemed to have given and presumed not to have withdrawn does not satisfy any exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. However, we … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on WI: Incapacitated driver provision unconstitutional re implied consent; but GFE applies here

GA: Consent at beginning of stop didn’t mean a second search after the stop should have ended

Defendant consented to a search of his car early on into the traffic stop. After the purpose of the stop was completed, a second search of the car wasn’t covered by the initial consent. State v. Drake, 2020 Ga. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Consent at beginning of stop didn’t mean a second search after the stop should have ended

GA: Officer’s request for consent to search didn’t require Miranda warning

Defendant’s questions about his arrest and the officer’s request for consent did not require a Miranda warning. State v. Pauldo, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 447 (June 16, 2020). N.9:

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent | Comments Off on GA: Officer’s request for consent to search didn’t require Miranda warning

CA7: Quick-turn flights of private airplane can contribute to RS

A private airplane’s “quick-turn flights, although not necessarily illegal, may contribute to reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct.” (California to Pennsylvania and waiting only a few hours; here stopped in Illinois) That, coupled with other information the officers had was reasonable … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Quick-turn flights of private airplane can contribute to RS

E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

The impoundment of defendant’s car on the property of another was reasonable. Officers were not required to wait for defendant to locate somebody to retrieve the car, and they didn’t have to leave it to inconvenience the property owner. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inventory | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Police not required to leave car on property of another rather than impound it

Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable

Officers thought defendant was on probation and searched him, but he wasn’t at the time. The state put on no evidence of good faith, so the search fails for lack of a factual or legal basis for the search. People … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.2: Mistake of fact def was on probation made probation search unreasonable

OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

Defendant’s maybe nodding her head yes was contrary to her words on the dashcam video. There was no unequivocal voluntary consent. State v. Casi, 2020-Ohio-3063, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 2010 (6th Dist. May 22, 2020). “Although the video of Vaclavik’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on OH6: State didn’t show unequivocal consent on dashcam video

CA3: Driving on suspended DL justifies inventory of car, so search was inevitable

Defendant was driving on a suspended license, and it was inevitable that his car would be towed and inventoried. The search was thus not suppressed. United States v. Bradley, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 15593 (3d Cir. May 15, 2020). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Inevitable discovery, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA3: Driving on suspended DL justifies inventory of car, so search was inevitable

OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

“It is common authority, not legal ownership, that confers actual authority to consent to a search. … In this case, the evidence was sufficient for the court to find that A shared common authority with defendant over the bedroom and … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on OR: Common authority, not ownership, confers actual authority to consent

MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution

A hotel customer has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the hotel’s registry information about the customer from government intrusion, at least with reasonable suspicion under the state constitution. The statute permitting inspection is constitutional with this limitation. The officer’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, State constitution | Comments Off on MN: REP in hotel registry information under state constitution