Category Archives: Franks doctrine

W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission

“The charges against Moran arise from an assault that occurred on May 31, 2006, and its alleged relationship to the Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Club, Rochester Charter (‘Hell’s Angels’), a purported enterprise within the meaning of the racketeering statute.” After an … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge to search warrant for house fails for lack of material omission

CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

There was probable cause for this § 1983 plaintiff’s arrest. While there may have been some violations of police regulations in how the controlled buy went down, a little “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation. Womack … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: Violation of some regulations may be “sloppy police work” that doesn’t make out a constitutional violation

BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application

BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application by Zoe Tillman: A federal prosecutor in Florida was recently disciplined for providing false information to a U.S. magistrate judge’s secretary about a tracker warrant application.

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on BLT: Florida Federal Prosecutor Disciplined Over Warrant Application

D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

First, defendant’s Franks argument fails. The negative information that he complains about not being more prominently displayed was “hidden” in a footnote in the 42 page affidavit. There is nothing that says that there can’t be information in footnotes. Second, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash

Nexus to defendant’s house for a drug search warrant was established by his leaving his house to do drug deals then coming right home. It’s common for drug dealers to keep their stash at home. State v. Hogan, 2014 Tenn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on Nexus: Drug dealer’s homes usually have the stash

Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Servers

Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Server by John Biggs: According to a court document released today, expert witness Joshua J. Horowitz, a lawyer and tech expert, believes the FBI is … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Tech Crunch: Expert Witness For Silk Road Suggests FBI Lied About How They Accessed Back-End Servers

D.Md.: Franks challenge successful but so limited it won’t help the defense much

The defense satisfied the court of a reckless omission of information about living arrangements in the house searched under the warrant, but the omission only leads to suppression of evidence from one room because that’s all the omission related to. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Md.: Franks challenge successful but so limited it won’t help the defense much

WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

During a Terry stop, the officer separated defendant from his backpack, and the backpack was searched about 10 minutes later when defendant was placed under arrest. The backpack was thus not on defendant’s person nor within his area of control … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Search incident | Comments Off on WA: Defendant was separated from his backpack, so it couldn’t be searched incident to arrest

CA7: Defense counsel’s security clearance doesn’t help see FISA material for Franks challenge

Just because defense counsel has security clearance, he doesn’t get to see all the material used in a FISA warrant for a Franks challenge. Balancing is required. On de novo review, defense counsel doesn’t get it. United States v. Daoud, … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA7: Defense counsel’s security clearance doesn’t help see FISA material for Franks challenge

CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

Officer’s false statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions in response. United States v. Saafir, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 10847 (4th Cir. June 11, 2014). Nexus was shown to seize a murder and … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Nexus | Comments Off on CA4: False statement of authority to search defendant’s car tainted the alleged consent and defendant’s admissions

E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks

False statement in an affidavit was testified to being a “mere mistake” in reporting information so the good faith exception still applies. If the officer testified it was a “mere mistake,” well, then, it can’t be wilfully false. Thus, the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: Officer’s testimony the falsity in the SW affidavit was a “mere mistake” good enough to overcome Franks

E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

At worst, the officer’s omission of three things from the affidavit for search warrant was negligent, not reckless, and, even if the material was included, it doesn’t defeat the finding of probable cause. “Thus, because Mr. Simpson has failed to … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, E-mail, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: If information omitted doesn’t undermine PC, no Franks violation

SC: Informant not properly supported; showing of PC fails under GFE

The affidavit for the search warrant was false in that it omitted that the informant was really an agent of the police in this endeavor, but it wasn’t material enough for Franks. The crux of the case is that the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on SC: Informant not properly supported; showing of PC fails under GFE

Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

Possession of a felt tip marker is not per se illegal as possession of graffiti tools. Intent to graffitiize still has to be required. The juvenile’s arrest was without probable cause. In re S.F., 224 Cal. App. 4th 1575 (1st … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.1: Possession of a felt tip marker not a crime without intent to graffitiize

W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

Defendant was flying a small aircraft, and he diverted from the flight plan. Local police were alerted, and a dog sniff was made of the airplane. The police went to the hotel where defendant was staying to talk to him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Dog alert on an airplane PC for SW

E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge

Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge. Here, probable cause was shown. United States v. Adams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50090 (E.D. Mich. April 11, 2014).* 2255 petitioner’s IAC claim was based in small … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Just because the facts could be more specific is not a Franks challenge