Category Archives: Franks doctrine

NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

Claimant was convicted of drug possession. The state notified him after the fact that the arresting officer had been indicted for perjury for a false search warrant affidavit in an unrelated case. His criminal case was a credibility contest about … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on NY Claims: Searching officer’s later perjury indictment over another SW affidavit supports claim over claimant’s conviction set aside as a result of disclosure

N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

“[T]he Court finds that the evidence is materially credible and consistent and, taken as a whole, indicates that it appeared very likely that law-enforcement activity had been detected by the time of the warrantless entry, that there was a high … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Apparently likelihood meth in office building could be moved justified warrantless entry

S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

The court’s finding of the officer’s recklessness in this search warrant affidavit leads the government to file a motion to reconsider, presumably because it will become Brady/Giglio material in future cases as to the officer. Not only is that denied, … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: AUSAs apparently failed duty to court to mitigate this Brady/Giglio issue before it reared its head

S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

“[T]he court must conclude that probable cause existed to seize Kurland’s phone at the time of his arrest and that the plain view exception permitted the government to seize it. To be sure: simply seeing a device in plain view … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Seizing a cell phone in plain view with PC for later SW is reasonable

D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

Another officer stopping the defendant under the collective knowledge doctrine at least has to be informed of what the “knowledge” is that warrants the stop. Without it, no reasonable suspicion. United States v. Roman, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30416 (D.Conn. … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Collective knowledge doctrine requires passing on some of the “knowledge”

E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear

When a Franks challenge is based on omissions, the bar is higher. Here, defendant didn’t meet it. United States v. McCoy, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30230 (E.D.Mich. Feb. 18, 2022):

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: A Franks challenge based on omissions is a higher bar to clear

C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

A jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the Fourth Amendment for recording telephone calls. An alleged violation of the Illinois wiretapping statute is not a constitutional violation. Hunt v. Securus Techs., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26452 (C.D.Ill. Feb. 15, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Jail telephone provider can’t be sued under the 4A for recording telephone calls

OH4: No standing in codef’s patdown

Defendant has no standing to challenge a codefendant’s patdown. In addition, admission of his jail calls was not a Fifth Amendment violation. (Finally, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for withdrawing a motion to suppress that was destined to fail.) State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: No standing in codef’s patdown

DC: Throwing backpack over a wall running from police is abandonment

The police gave chase to defendant, and he ran down an alley and threw his backpack over a wall into somebody else’s backyard. “In the present case, we assume without deciding that Mr. Kyle retained a subjective expectation of privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on DC: Throwing backpack over a wall running from police is abandonment

D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

A prosecutor is absolutely immune in presenting search warrant applications to a court. Miller v. Rivas, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22754 (D.N.J. Feb. 8, 2022). The affidavit for search warrant here was based on probable cause. The executing officers waited … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Prosecutor absolutely immune for SW application

NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

Defendant stated a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel that defense counsel never obtained the search warrant materials to even investigate. Reversed to have the state produce it. People v. Tindley, 2022 NY Slip Op 00886, 2022 N.Y. App. Div. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Def stated IAC claim that defense counsel never looked at SW materials

CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

The district court did not plainly err in allowing supervised release searches of defendant’s computer for a gun crime. U.S.S.G. § 5D1.3(d)(7). Under precedent, a search condition does not have to be specifically related to the crime. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probation / Parole search, Staleness, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on CA11: Computer searches as condition of supervised release for gun crime not plain error

OH4: That stop was with RS isn’t arguing that it was continued with RS, and that’s waiver

Defendant started with the argument that the stop lacked reasonable suspicion, but he did not argue that the stop was continued with reasonable suspicion until the appeal. Failure to raise it that way in the trial court was waiver. State … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Waiver | Comments Off on OH4: That stop was with RS isn’t arguing that it was continued with RS, and that’s waiver

CA6: There was PC and exigency for search of car even though district court didn’t say “automobile exception”

The smell of marijuana from defendant’s car was probable cause. The district court didn’t say “automobile exception,” but that’s what it meant. United States v. Hall, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 2983 (6th Cir. Feb. 2, 2022).* Defendant’s Franks allegation fails … Continue reading →

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: There was PC and exigency for search of car even though district court didn’t say “automobile exception”

CA11: Failure to plead facts of standing or REP requires denial of motion to suppress

“If a defendant fails to plead sufficient facts to show a reasonable expectation of privacy, ‘a trial court may refuse a defendant’s request for a suppression hearing’ and deny his motion to suppress.” United States v. Robinson, 2022 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Failure to plead facts of standing or REP requires denial of motion to suppress

Cal.4: GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of home confinement

GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of defendant’s home confinement sentence. People v. Gerson, 2022 Cal. App. LEXIS 72 (4th Dist. Jan. 28, 2022). “Although Defendant complied with Franks by (1) specifically identifying the portion of the … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: GPS monitoring with a search waiver were reasonable conditions of home confinement

D.N.M.: Failure to incorporate attachments to SW affidavit subject to GFE

The attachments to the affidavits were attached but not incorporated by words in the affidavit. The court doesn’t decide that this is a Fourth Amendment violation because the good faith exception applies. The search of a cell phone attempted within … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Failure to incorporate attachments to SW affidavit subject to GFE

E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

Defendant’s claim the information about a co-conspirator’s phone search must be fabricated because that search warrant wasn’t in his discovery was “specious.” He doesn’t even have standing. Edwards v. United States, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14407 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2022).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Complaint about co-def’s cell phone search was “specious,” and def doesn’t even have standing

TX: Pet’r gets remand over alleged pattern of lies elsewhere of one officer on SW application

Petitioner gets remand and a hearing that a police officer caught in lies on multiple search warrant applications around the same time could have here, too. Ex parte Mathews, 2022 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 36 (Jan. 26, 2022). Defendant’s father … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX: Pet’r gets remand over alleged pattern of lies elsewhere of one officer on SW application

E.D.Pa.: Govt’s post-trial concession search was illegal undermines half the counts of conviction, and no harmless error on remainder

The government concedes after conviction on seven counts that three of the counts against defendant were the product of an illegal search. They argue the remainder can stand without it. It can’t because, if there was any doubt for any … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Standards of review | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Govt’s post-trial concession search was illegal undermines half the counts of conviction, and no harmless error on remainder