Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

HI: Fly-over of curtilage at 420′ violated REP under state constitution

Three fly-overs over the curtilage, one at 420′, was a violation of the Hawai’i Constitution, following the California Supreme Court in People v. Cook (1985). The Hawai’i Supreme Court differs from the Intermediate Court of Appeals on its analysis going … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on HI: Fly-over of curtilage at 420′ violated REP under state constitution

D.Mont.: No REP in a jail call

Defendant’s recorded jail call did not afford him an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy. His reliance on a Montana case on another issue not at all like this that did recognize a limited reasonable expectation of privacy under the Montana … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Mont.: No REP in a jail call

OR: No REP in a camera and SD card left recording in a Starbucks bathroom

Defendant left a camera disguised as a cell phone charger in a Starbucks bathroom. It was found by a customer and turned over to the store manager. The manager believed it to be a camera, opened the back, and found … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: No REP in a camera and SD card left recording in a Starbucks bathroom

S.D.N.Y.: 21 month pole camera surveillance of def’s front door was reasonable

Pole camera surveillance of defendant’s house for 21 months didn’t violate Fourth Amendment. He had a subjective reasonable expectation privacy, but it’s not one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. The court traces Katz to Jardines, and concludes … Continue reading →

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: 21 month pole camera surveillance of def’s front door was reasonable

WA: Homeless man had REP in his tent camping in park after hours

A homeless man camping in a tent in Vancouver, WA had a privacy interest in his closed tent even though he was camping after hours. State v. Pippin, 2017 Wash. App. LEXIS 2365 (Oct. 10, 2017):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on WA: Homeless man had REP in his tent camping in park after hours

CA11: Parolee has no REP where he stays

Officers had cause for a protective sweep as well as consent from defendant’s girlfriend to search her apartment where he often stayed. A shotgun was in plain view. Defendant also had no standing because he was a parolee. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA11: Parolee has no REP where he stays

E.D.Wash.: No REP in jail calls

Defendant’s jail calls were not obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Angulo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190187 (E.D. Wash. March 18, 2015). Defendant challenges defense counsel’s performance in not asking the right questions during the suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: No REP in jail calls

D.Colo: No REP in prison cell or photographs of inmate’s body in a prison murder case

Defendant was charged with murder of another inmate in ADX Florence. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his prison cell from a search, and photographing his body was reasonable and not an invasion of privacy. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Colo: No REP in prison cell or photographs of inmate’s body in a prison murder case

SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

CA9: Guest of evicted tenant has no REP in premises

Plaintiff claimed to be the guest of the alleged tenant who had been evicted from the premises and he knew it. Thus, they were trespassers, and there was no reasonable expectation of privacy to complain of the officers’ entry. Plaintiff … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Guest of evicted tenant has no REP in premises

ME: SW not needed to photograph def’s facial injuries

Police didn’t need a search warrant to photograph injuries on defendant’s face. State v. McNaughton, 2017 ME 173, 2017 Me. LEXIS 193 (Aug. 1, 2017). There was neither reasonable suspicion for defendant’s stop nor his patdown. No facts were put … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on ME: SW not needed to photograph def’s facial injuries

CA8: Code inspectors’ entry into common areas of rental property wasn’t 4A violation

City code inspectors’ entries into the common areas of plaintiff’s “historically unmanageable rental properties” did not violate the Fourth Amendment for lack of a reasonable expectation of privacy in those places. His claims as to allegedly protected areas was waived. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA8: Code inspectors’ entry into common areas of rental property wasn’t 4A violation

N.D.Ind.: Use of drug dog in hotel hallway wasn’t at all like invading the curtilage in Jardines

Use of a drug dog in a hotel hallway that produced an alert on defendant’s room’s door was not unreasonble under Jardines. A hotel hallway, accessible to many people, cannot be compared to the curtilage of a home. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Use of drug dog in hotel hallway wasn’t at all like invading the curtilage in Jardines

PA: No REP in a gun hidden in ceiling tile at work that fell out

Officers came to the barber shop where defendant worked because of a call about a threat with a weapon. Defendant was in the bathroom, and one officer went to the door. Another went into the adjoining bathroom. Defendant put a … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on PA: No REP in a gun hidden in ceiling tile at work that fell out

TX13: Untested hospital drawn blood sample has to be obtained by SW not subpoena

Defendant was in a car wreck and hospitalized. The other person in the wreck died. At the hospital, he was treated and released, but blood was drawn for medical purposes but never analyzed by the hospital. The officer obtained a … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX13: Untested hospital drawn blood sample has to be obtained by SW not subpoena

WI: Tax assessor’s effort to see interior of home for assessment implicates the 4A

The tax assessor’s demand to see the interior of plaintiffs’ house is a search governed by the Fourth Amendment. Because it is the home, it is not “minimal,” and there is no administrative search exception that permits it. The city … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search | Comments Off on WI: Tax assessor’s effort to see interior of home for assessment implicates the 4A

OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen

The plain view doctrine did not apply because the firearm was not immediately apparent as incriminating evidence or contraband, and testimony at the suppression hearing established the officers could not readily identify the firearm as stolen. State v. Elschlager, 2017-Ohio-5545, … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH5: Plain view didn’t apply to a firearm where it wasn’t readily obvious it was stolen

LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

Showing a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched but denying possession is a fine line indeed. Show too much of an expectation of privacy just to challenge the search [always a risky proposition] and you might put yourself … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on LA: “Defendant thus was in the difficult position of having to both distance himself from the barbeque grill, if he hoped to be found not guilty of possession of the cocaine found inside it, and tie himself more closely to the grill, if he hoped to obtain a favorable ruling on the motion to suppress. Trying to do both, he succeeded at neither.”

ABAJ: Federal prosecutor admits she listened to recordings of attorney-client conversations, filing says

ABAJ: Federal prosecutor admits she listened to recordings of attorney-client conversations, filing says by Debra Cassens Weiss:

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on ABAJ: Federal prosecutor admits she listened to recordings of attorney-client conversations, filing says

CA3: Search of prison cell didn’t violate 4A

The search of plaintiff’s prison cell and confiscation of some of his stuff wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Barndt v. Wenerowicz, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10754 (3d Cir. June 19, 2017).* The officer here saw a vehicle parked outside a … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA3: Search of prison cell didn’t violate 4A