E.D.Wash.: No REP in jail calls

Defendant’s jail calls were not obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Angulo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190187 (E.D. Wash. March 18, 2015).

Defendant challenges defense counsel’s performance in not asking the right questions during the suppression hearing which led to denial of the motion to suppress and affirmance on appeal. The different questions wouldn’t have changed the outcome. United States v. Gibson, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156555 (N.D. Fla. June 12, 2017),* adopted, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155157 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 22, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.