Category Archives: Warrant execution

Cal.4: DV improper in state § 1983 case; 14 detention of guests at house at time of raid was likely unreasonable, and no QI

Plaintiff had a big annual Halloween party at his Orange County mansion that the neighbors always complained about. This one was called “Casino Night,” so the OCSO decided to get a search warrant and raid the place with the SWAT … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Cal.4: DV improper in state § 1983 case; 14 detention of guests at house at time of raid was likely unreasonable, and no QI

W.D.N.Y.: Use of a drug dog during a house search here wasn’t objectively unreasonable; interesting case on changes Jardines might have wrought on dogs and houses

Officers searched defendant’s house with a search warrant, and, after it started, a drug dog was brought in and didn’t find anything. Noting that blanket suppression is a drastic remedy, and Jardines changed the landscape of use of dogs in … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Use of a drug dog during a house search here wasn’t objectively unreasonable; interesting case on changes Jardines might have wrought on dogs and houses

CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

On plain error review, consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review. United States v. Price\, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22996 (7th Cir. December 5, 2014). There was no evidence defense counsel didn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA7: Consent to search a laptop in a child pornography case included a full forensic review

S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone PC and particularity; GFE applies to cell phone warrant execution

Defendant was a guard at Riker’s Island prison complex, and he was arrested in a drug conspiracy. When a cell phone is removed from a person at the time of arrest and a search warrant is sought, the government doesn’t … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone PC and particularity; GFE applies to cell phone warrant execution

Three Aaron Hernandez cell phone and house search cases on Lexis today; cell phone turned over to lawyers not immune from search (Updated)

Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 2014 Mass. Super. LEXIS 144 (Super. Ct. Bristol August 26, 2014) (“Because the Commonwealth failed to sustain its burden of proof that the cell phones and iPads were in plain view, that their incriminating character was immediately … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on Three Aaron Hernandez cell phone and house search cases on Lexis today; cell phone turned over to lawyers not immune from search (Updated)

D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

First, defendant’s Franks argument fails. The negative information that he complains about not being more prominently displayed was “hidden” in a footnote in the 42 page affidavit. There is nothing that says that there can’t be information in footnotes. Second, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Omission of items from return not prejudicial; using footnotes in SW affidavit isn’t “hiding” information

GA: Loud yelling and cursing at officers conducting a search here constituted crime of obstruction

Defendant was properly convicted of misdemeanor obstruction of an officer for screaming and yelling during execution of a search warrant where the officers tried to get him to stop three times, and finally it took two to deal with him, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on GA: Loud yelling and cursing at officers conducting a search here constituted crime of obstruction

CO: Waiting for defendant to put his backpack in car to execute search warrant for car wasn’t unreasonable

Police obtained a search warrant for defendant’s car in the murder of his ex-wife. They surveilled the car for two hours until defendant appeared and put his backpack in the car. Then they approached and seized the car. Waiting until … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CO: Waiting for defendant to put his backpack in car to execute search warrant for car wasn’t unreasonable

OH3: SW for strip search didn’t authorize anal penetration, and record supports there wasn’t any; “where [do] the buttocks end and … the anal cavity begin”

Officers obtained a warrant for a strip search to retrieve a baggie of suspected drugs hidden in defendant’s anus. The warrant did not authorize penetration, and the record supports that there was no penetration. The baggie protruded some, and it … Continue reading

Posted in Strip search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH3: SW for strip search didn’t authorize anal penetration, and record supports there wasn’t any; “where [do] the buttocks end and … the anal cavity begin”

NC: The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant

The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant. State v. Shepley, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 1124 (November 4, 2014): “During the administration of a breathalyzer test, the person being … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NC: The right to have counsel present during a breathalyzer test doesn’t apply to blood draws under a search warrant

WaPo: Wrong-door raid gone relatively right is still wrong

WaPo: Wrong-door raid gone relatively right is still wrong by Lucy Steigerwald: Until the war on drugs entirely ends, perhaps all we can hope for is to have a police department polite enough to fix a door they just broke.

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on WaPo: Wrong-door raid gone relatively right is still wrong

MO: GFE didn’t apply where clearly no PC and police exceeded the scope of the warrant

The trial court found the affidavit for the search warrant lacked a substantial basis for finding probable cause and that the officers acted in bad faith in exceeding the scope of a drug and paraphernalia warrant to seize BB gun … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on MO: GFE didn’t apply where clearly no PC and police exceeded the scope of the warrant

HuffPo: Michigan Cops Raid Wrong House, Shoot Beloved 15-Year-Old Dog

HuffPo: Michigan Cops Raid Wrong House, Shoot Beloved 15-Year-Old Dog by David Lohr: Authorities who went to the wrong house in search of a wanted fugitive and shot a beloved family pet are refusing to take responsibility for their actions, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Police misconduct, Warrant execution | Comments Off on HuffPo: Michigan Cops Raid Wrong House, Shoot Beloved 15-Year-Old Dog

Courthouse News Service: Cops Can’t Always Be TV Stars, Judge Says

Courthouse News Service: Cops Can’t Always Be TV Stars, Judge Says by Cameron Langford: Texas lawmen who let a reality TV crew film their raid of a suspect’s home may have violated the woman’s civil rights, a federal judge ruled.

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Courthouse News Service: Cops Can’t Always Be TV Stars, Judge Says

S.D.Ala.: SW for drugs doesn’t need to mention firearms to seize them when found

A search warrant for drugs doesn’t have to mention firearms to seize them. Firearms and drugs are usually linked, and there is a reasonable inference that the presence of firearms around drugs means they are related to each other. United … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.Ala.: SW for drugs doesn’t need to mention firearms to seize them when found

LegalIntelligencer.com: Extraterritorial Searches for Electronically Stored Information

LegalIntelligencer.com: Extraterritorial Searches for Electronically Stored Information by Leonard Deutchman: On Sept. 18, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, along with Sens. Chris Coons, D-Del., and Dean Heller, R-Nev., introduced the Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act, or the LEADS … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on LegalIntelligencer.com: Extraterritorial Searches for Electronically Stored Information

CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

The officer hit defendant’s door hard to announce his presence under the knock-and-announce requirement and the door swung open on its own. That was technically a “breaking” under § 3109, but it was reasonable to enter without announcement because of … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Arrest or entry on arrest, Automobile exception, Consent, Knock and announce, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA4: Officers didn’t force their way in, but the exceptions to knock-and-announce applied

NYTimes: Child Pornography Case Spurs Debate on Military’s Role in Law Enforcement

NYTimes: Child Pornography Case Spurs Debate on Military’s Role in Law Enforcement by Erik Eckholm and Richard A. Oppel Jr.: In a field office near Brunswick, Ga., a federal agent working as an undercover cybersleuth signed on to a large … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on NYTimes: Child Pornography Case Spurs Debate on Military’s Role in Law Enforcement

CA6: Govt properly filtered attorney calls in wiretap

On a health care fraud wiretap, the government lawfully used Hindu translators as “contractors” assisting in the wiretap, and attorney-client privileged calls were properly filtered out. No violation of either Title III or the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Patel, … Continue reading

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Govt properly filtered attorney calls in wiretap

NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim

The entry into defendant’s home was justified under the emergency aid doctrine on a finding of blood despite a two hour delay where the police were calling hospitals trying to locate the defendant to avoid the entry unless it was … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on NJ: Emergency entry valid despite two hour delay attempting to locate victim