Author Archives: Hall

NYTimes Magazine: How a $2 Roadside Drug Test Sends Innocent People to Jail

NYTimes Magazine: How a $2 Roadside Drug Test Sends Innocent People to Jail by Ryan Gabrielson and Topher Sander: Widespread evidence shows that these tests routinely produce false positives. Why are police departments and prosecutors across the country still using … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NYTimes Magazine: How a $2 Roadside Drug Test Sends Innocent People to Jail

NC: Driving at normal speed out of a parking lot wasn’t “flight” for RS purposes

Driving out of a parking lot at a normal speed was not flight for reasonable suspicion purposes. “In the present case, the officers observed activity which made them suspect that Defendant’s actions in leaving the apartment complex might constitute flight, … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NC: Driving at normal speed out of a parking lot wasn’t “flight” for RS purposes

E.D.Mich.: Omission of CI’s prior inconsistent statement didn’t require Franks hearing

The fact that more detail could have been included, including prior inconsistent statements of informants, that doesn’t make a search warrant affidavit false or misleading for Franks purposes because it wouldn’t change outcome. United States v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Omission of CI’s prior inconsistent statement didn’t require Franks hearing

N.D.Cal.: On a motion to reconsider, this is why def wasn’t deemed credible at suppression hearing

Defendant was found not credible at the suppression hearing. He filed a motion to reconsider to object. The court explains why, which is a lesson to all defense lawyers and maybe defendants. United States v. Lawson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: On a motion to reconsider, this is why def wasn’t deemed credible at suppression hearing

D.Utah: Nexus to home for SW shown by def driving to drug deals from home

Sufficient nexus was shown for a search warrant for defendant’s home from his observed drug dealing on the street. He drove to the drug deals from his home, and other intel had him dealing at home. United States v. Galaviz-Gaxiola, … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Nexus to home for SW shown by def driving to drug deals from home

N.D.Cal.: Facial showing of racially discriminatory arrests made to get more discovery

Defendant made a sufficient showing of race-based selective enforcement in arrests in Operation Safe Streets in the Tenderloin District of San Francisco to get more discovery. United States v. Mumphrey, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85593 (N.D.Cal. June 30, 2016). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Racial profiling, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Facial showing of racially discriminatory arrests made to get more discovery

Bustle: The Shooting Of Alton Sterling Makes This Sonia Sotomayor Dissent More Potent Than Ever

Bustle: The Shooting Of Alton Sterling Makes This Sonia Sotomayor Dissent More Potent Than Ever by Hillary E. Crawford:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Bustle: The Shooting Of Alton Sterling Makes This Sonia Sotomayor Dissent More Potent Than Ever

LA Daily News: Privacy isn’t being protected by Congress

LA Daily News: Privacy isn’t being protected by Congress:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA Daily News: Privacy isn’t being protected by Congress

ID: Motorhome stopped when vehicle behind was stopped for following too close; contact with driver was by consent

The officer stopped a vehicle for following a motorhome too closely. The motorhome also pulled over and stopped, and the driver attempted to come back to the stop, but he was told to get back in the motorhome. When the … Continue reading →

Posted in Community caretaking function, Consent, Search incident | Comments Off on ID: Motorhome stopped when vehicle behind was stopped for following too close; contact with driver was by consent

Argus Leader: Police use catheters, force to collect urine samples

Argus Leader: Police use catheters, force to collect urine samples by Mark Walker, Patrick Anderson and John Hult: Practice brought to light in recent case out of Pierre; AG says it’s not illegal Police in South Dakota are collecting urine … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Argus Leader: Police use catheters, force to collect urine samples

IL: Error in overruling def objection at suppression hearing doesn’t require new suppression hearing if outcome wouldn’t change

Erroneous overruling of defendant’s objections during a suppression hearing doesn’t necessarily require a new suppression hearing if the appellate court finds it harmless or wouldn’t change the outcome. People v. Maxey, 2016 IL App (1st) 130698, 2016 Ill. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on IL: Error in overruling def objection at suppression hearing doesn’t require new suppression hearing if outcome wouldn’t change

UT: Car can be stopped where RS passenger in violation of probation

A police officer can pull over a car with a probationer as a passenger when there was reasonable suspicion the passenger was in violation of probation. State v. Mikkelson, 2016 UT App 136, 2016 Utah App. LEXIS 139 (June 30, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on UT: Car can be stopped where RS passenger in violation of probation

WI S.Ct. decides inevitable discovery for first time and it overcomes a statement obtained in bad faith

Wisconsin Supreme Court decides the inevitable discovery rule for the first time. Despite officer’s bad faith in obtaining a statement without proper Miranda warnings, the evidence is clear to the Supreme Court that the search would have occurred without statement. … Continue reading →

Posted in Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on WI S.Ct. decides inevitable discovery for first time and it overcomes a statement obtained in bad faith

NYTimes: In Dissents, Sonia Sotomayor Takes On the Criminal Justice System

NYTimes: In Dissents, Sonia Sotomayor Takes On the Criminal Justice System by Adam Liptak: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court term had barely gotten underway in early November when Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued her first dissent. A police officer’s “rogue conduct,” … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on NYTimes: In Dissents, Sonia Sotomayor Takes On the Criminal Justice System

Treatise 10% off through 7/6 midnight

Bookstore Not the 20-25% of before, but something.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 10% off through 7/6 midnight

OC Breeze: Celebrating the Bill of Rights: Fourth Amendment

OC Breeze: Celebrating the Bill of Rights: Fourth Amendment Celebrating the Bill of Rights, your defense and bulwark against the encroachment by government into your personal liberty. (The Bill of Rights, incidentally, was ratified December 15, 1791: 15 years, 4 … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OC Breeze: Celebrating the Bill of Rights: Fourth Amendment

HI: Dog sniff for a mere traffic violation unreasonable

The car defendant was in was stopped because of a seat belt violation. Defendant was recognized as being involved in drugs, so a drug dog was called out. Using the drug dog for a mere traffic stop was unreasonable without … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on HI: Dog sniff for a mere traffic violation unreasonable

IA: Def’s search may have violated “plain feel” when drugs removed, but search incident would have occurred shortly

The search of defendant may have violated “plain feel” because the drugs in his pocket obviously weren’t a weapon, it was inevitably discovered because it was the product of a search incident for finding drugs on the car. Stephen v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inevitable discovery | Comments Off on IA: Def’s search may have violated “plain feel” when drugs removed, but search incident would have occurred shortly

WY: It was reasonable for officer to believe backpack behind driver was his for consent search; no objection from passenger

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search of his backpack in the car of another when the other consented to a search of the car. Defendant’s backpack was behind the driver, not him, … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Scope of search | Comments Off on WY: It was reasonable for officer to believe backpack behind driver was his for consent search; no objection from passenger

Two on pre-Jones GPS and good faith

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging GPS in 2007. The state passed its own GPS statute in 2002, and defendant argued it wasn’t complied with when a GPS was placed on his car after an armored car robbery he … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on Two on pre-Jones GPS and good faith