Bustle: The Shooting Of Alton Sterling Makes This Sonia Sotomayor Dissent More Potent Than Ever

Bustle: The Shooting Of Alton Sterling Makes This Sonia Sotomayor Dissent More Potent Than Ever by Hillary E. Crawford:

The shooting of 37-year-old Alton Sterling has lent eerie relevancy to Sonia Sotomayor’s dissenting opinion of a Fourth Amendment “search and seizure” ruling on June 20. In 2006, cops illegally searched Edward Strieff without a warrant and found illegal drugs and other paraphernalia that were later used to convict him in court. When Utah v. Strieff made its way to the Supreme Court years later, a 5-3 majority ruled that the exclusionary rule did not apply to illegally obtained evidence if there is an outstanding arrest warrant for the person illegally searched. In other words, illegally obtained evidence can be used to convict a defendant in court.

Sotomayor, alongside Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, suggested the decision facilitates discrimination and puts too much power into the hands of authority. After police pinned Sterling to the ground and shot him, it feels as though Sotomayor’s fear has come to fruition.

Sotomayor began her written dissent by warning the public that the ruling gives police the ability to stop anyone on the street upon discovery of an unpaid parking ticket, for example. …

This entry was posted in SCOTUS. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.