D.Utah: Nexus to home for SW shown by def driving to drug deals from home

Sufficient nexus was shown for a search warrant for defendant’s home from his observed drug dealing on the street. He drove to the drug deals from his home, and other intel had him dealing at home. United States v. Galaviz-Gaxiola, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86330 (D.Utah June 30, 2016).*

The District Court doesn’t find the testimony of the officer observing alleged drug transactions from a nearby rooftop to be credible at the suppression hearing. His reports weren’t the same as his grand jury testimony which wasn’t the same as his suppression hearing testimony about the movement of people and the alleged exchange of money on the street. “In sum, even assuming that Officer Kinane’s testimony concerning his rooftop observations could provide a basis for ‘reasonable suspicion,’ his testimony is not credible.” Text messages found after the arrest can’t be used to determine probable cause for a warrantless arrest. His encounter with the police can’t be described as voluntary. United States v. McDow, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84649 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Nexus, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.