Author Archives: Hall

E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

The tipster provided only easily known public information, but for the fact defendant sat in his car and smoked marijuana during his lunch breaks. Police watched him and he didn’t do that. Because the police never corroborated the one observable … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: CI’s only nonpublic fact wasn’t corroborated, so no RS

TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal

The CI’s information defendant would be delivering crack cocaine to a specific apartment complex and an officer’s personal observations of defendant arriving there and engaging in what appeared to be a drug deal were sufficient to create reasonable suspicion to … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on TN: CI’s tale def was coming to apartment complex to do a drug deal was corroborated by him showing up and apparently doing a drug deal

OH5: Where motion to suppress was actually pursued as a motion in limine, appeal after conditional plea fails

Defendant’s motion to suppress was cast as a motion in limine that the police officers should be barred from testifying because their police car wasn’t properly marked. The trial court denied the motion and defendant conditionally pled. He can’t appeal … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH5: Where motion to suppress was actually pursued as a motion in limine, appeal after conditional plea fails

NV justice courts have statutory power to suppress during preliminary hearings

By statute, Nevada justice courts have express authority to suppress illegally obtained evidence during preliminary hearings. Grace v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., 131 Nev. Adv. Rep. 51, 2016 Nev. LEXIS 639 (July 21, 2016). Even if the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on NV justice courts have statutory power to suppress during preliminary hearings

OR: Stuff left in a crashed and abandoned stolen truck had no REP

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in containers he left fleeing from a stolen truck. State v. Stubblefield, 279 Ore. App. 483, 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 928 (July 20, 2016). The officer smelled burnt marijuana during his stop of … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Stuff left in a crashed and abandoned stolen truck had no REP

TX13: Arrest on outstanding warrants doesn’t justify search incident of car

When defendant was arrested on outstanding warrants, his car was not subject to search incident. State v. Sanchez, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 7712 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg July 21, 2016). “[T]he clearly established law in existence in … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Search incident | Comments Off on TX13: Arrest on outstanding warrants doesn’t justify search incident of car

W.D.Ohio: Factual basis for stop overcomes pretext

There was a factual basis for the stop, so the pretext argument fails. United States v. Diaz-Cordova, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91591 (N.D.Ohio July 14, 2016). It appears that the U.S. Marshals had objectively reasonable belief that defendant was where … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Pretext | Comments Off on W.D.Ohio: Factual basis for stop overcomes pretext

M.D.Ala.: Consent to search after Miranda violation not attenuated

Defendant’s consent to search after his admitted Miranda violation was invalid. Moreover, the vehicle search was otherwise unlawful because the government can’t support it as an inventory search. United States v. Groce, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93352 (M.D.Ala. July 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Independent source, Inventory | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Consent to search after Miranda violation not attenuated

N.D.Ga.: Conclusory allegation tracking warrant not properly issued fails

Conclusory allegations that an electronic tracking warrant wasn’t issued in compliance with Rule 4.1 is not sufficient to get a hearing. United States v. Joyner, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90241 (N.D.Ga. May 24, 2016). The factual record supports the district … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Conclusory allegation tracking warrant not properly issued fails

NPR: To Reduce Bias, Some Police Departments Are Rethinking Traffic Stops

NPR: To Reduce Bias, Some Police Departments Are Rethinking Traffic Stops by Jeff Cohen:

Posted in Pretext | Comments Off on NPR: To Reduce Bias, Some Police Departments Are Rethinking Traffic Stops

ND: When two in car remain silent as to which bag belongs to which person, consent to search is complete

When the driver and passenger remain silent as to who’s bag belongs to whom, the consent of one applies to all of it. State v. Asbach, 2016 ND 152, 2016 N.D. LEXIS 150 (July 20, 2016):

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on ND: When two in car remain silent as to which bag belongs to which person, consent to search is complete

Fusion: Police asked this 3D printing lab to recreate a dead man’s fingers to unlock his phone

Fusion: Police asked this 3D printing lab to recreate a dead man’s fingers to unlock his phone by Rose Eveleth: So instead of asking the company that made the phone to grant them access, they’re going another route: having the … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Fusion: Police asked this 3D printing lab to recreate a dead man’s fingers to unlock his phone

N.D.Cal.: Listening devices in a public place overcame any reasonable expectation of privacy; 1984 was not just a book — it’s here

The FBI planted recording devices outside two courthouses in Northern California to catch conversations on the street between their targets. The devices were planted in a light fixture, a bus stop, and on a parked vehicle. The court finds no … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Listening devices in a public place overcame any reasonable expectation of privacy; 1984 was not just a book — it’s here

NJ: Heien reasonable mistake doesn’t apply to an unambiguous statute

Defendant was parked with high beams on on a one way street. The statute unambiguously says that it was not a violation unless there was an oncoming vehicle, and being on a one way street or an officer on foot … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on NJ: Heien reasonable mistake doesn’t apply to an unambiguous statute

TN: Not filing motion to suppress was best strategy to disassociate from house searched by not having to show standing

Defense counsel’s refusal to file a motion to suppress the search of the place defendant was found in was reasonable strategy to separate defendant from the drugs found in the house. To seek to suppress the search, defendant would have … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standing | Comments Off on TN: Not filing motion to suppress was best strategy to disassociate from house searched by not having to show standing

CA7: Ptf stated cause of action for illegal search and false arrest

Plaintiff ran a dog-grooming business and rescue shelter. One dog was overly aggressive and killed another dog, and another became gravely ill after whelping a litter. He took the dogs to Chicago animal control, and they ended up arresting him … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA7: Ptf stated cause of action for illegal search and false arrest

Cal.1st: Juvenile’s electronic search probation condition was shown justified by his circumstances

It was proper to impose an electronic search probation condition on a minor, even though it was not related to his burglary offense, because it was reasonably related to deterring future criminality. It allowed probation officers to monitor the minor’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.1st: Juvenile’s electronic search probation condition was shown justified by his circumstances

WA: Fisherman being ticketed for snagging fish asked about gun in car was not subject to protective weapons search

“Law enforcement need not obtain a warrant prior to conducting a protective vehicle search, so long as there is reasonable suspicion a suspect is dangerous and may gain immediate control of weapons. We are confronted with whether a suspect’s potential … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on WA: Fisherman being ticketed for snagging fish asked about gun in car was not subject to protective weapons search

CA2: Exclusionary rule applies to civil forfeiture cases and govt’s civil discovery

In a forfeiture action against a NYC office building and several other buildings because one of the corporate owners was a front for the Iranian government, the Second Circuit held that “The Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule applies in civil forfeiture … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture | Comments Off on CA2: Exclusionary rule applies to civil forfeiture cases and govt’s civil discovery

Noticed that there are fewer postings? Working on the 2016 supplement

Not to mention 140 hours on an Eighth Circuit brief filed two weeks ago.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Noticed that there are fewer postings? Working on the 2016 supplement