Author Archives: Hall

WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

Defendant consented to a blood draw knowing that his license would have been revoked if he didn’t. “Blackman, by choosing to give actual consent, made a voluntary choice. The choice was Blackman’s alone and, as such, was not coerced.” State … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Standing | Comments Off on WI: Consent to a blood draw or suffer DL revo was still voluntary consent

CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search. Nance v. Humane Society to Pulaski County, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14239 (8th Cir. Aug. 4, 2016):

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA8: Losing a motion to suppress in state court is collateral estoppel to a § 1983 case over the same search

CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

Defendant consented to a search of his car during a stop because of something dragging under the car. He was asked because he was nervous. In the trunk, the officer noticed the carpet was glued down, and that indicated to … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Apparent hidden compartment under trunk raised RS to PC

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional? by Debra Cassens Weiss No. The fact police think it’s not speaks to their psychology.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on ABAJ: Drivers are pulled over for driving without an ice cream cone; are the stops unconstitutional?

N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

Surreptitious recordings outside the San Mateo courthouse of persons talking amongst themselves were entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy because they talked such that others could not overhear them except with planted recording devices. United States v. Giraudo, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Conversations outside courthouse were entitled to REP

NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

Because of the heightened privacy protection in the home, it was unreasonable for the officer here to conclude that one adult resident of a home could consent to a search of the room of another adult resident. “Third parties derive … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on NJ: Joint occupancy by adults with separate bedrooms doesn’t give apparent authority over each other’s rooms

CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

The district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants on a third party consent issue. There was no reason to believe that the person they sought consent from had an equal or superior control over the briefcase at issue, … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on CA9: Dist.Ct. erred in finding apparent authority over a briefcase that the consenter had no interest in when owner was objecting

M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential.” United States v. Collins, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101003 (M.D.Fla. May 31, 2016), adopted, 2016 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: The automobile exception is based on inherent mobility, and the fact the defendant is handcuffed and the police have the keys is “inconsequential”

E.D.N.C.: Information about the amorphous “they” wasn’t probable cause here

“For all these reasons, the Court is persuaded that probable cause requires more than what the agents in this case knew at the time of arrest. Here, the strongest evidence the agents had was that the broker reported ‘they’ were … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: Information about the amorphous “they” wasn’t probable cause here

FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol

FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol:

Posted in Border search, Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on FoxNews: Border Patrol’s website offers advice on eluding … Border Patrol

S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

Defendant who bought a vehicle and then loaned it to another to do a drug run lacked standing in the vehicle. “Having provided the Yukon to Sandy for purposes of making the trip to New Orleans, Jorge Gomez thereby relinquished … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Buying a vehicle and loaning it for a drug run is a loss of the REP; denial of knowledge of a secret compartment is a waiver of the REP

ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

ABA Journal: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment? by Erwin Chemerinsky: In the recently completed Supreme Court term, Utah v. Strieff was the only major decision where the conservatives prevailed in an ideologically divided … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on ABAJ: Chemerinsky: Has the Supreme Court dealt a blow to the Fourth Amendment?

NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

New Jersey requires a court order, albeit on less than probable cause, to get telephone records. To enable criminal investigations to proceed, probable cause isn’t required. State v. Lunsford, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 717 (Aug. 1, 2016) (syllabus):

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on NJ requires court order to get telephone records, but PC not required

MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

Michigan granted discretionary review to determine the application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk, but dismissed it after considering the briefs. Three justices dissented from declining to decide the case. People v. Radandt, 2016 Mich. LEXIS 1591 (July 29, 2016)*:

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on MI dismisses grant of discretionary review on application of Jardines to a knock-and-talk

W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

There was more than probable cause, and inference on inference here showed it on the totality. A crack cocaine deal going down in a hotel room proved to be exigent circumstances. It would take two hours to get a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: Exigencies of crack deal going down in hotel room excused warrant

S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all

“Mr. Lee made a perfunctory, one-sentence argument that the evidence seized during the search of his residence should be suppressed because there was ‘no probable cause to believe evidence related to [the charged] offenses would be found in Jonesboro Arkansas … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: “perfunctory, one-sentence argument” in motion to suppress was no motion at all

S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

The affidavit for the search warrant was a close enough showing of probable cause to make reliance on the affidavit objectively reasonable under the good faith exception. United States v. Melendez, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98940 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 2016):

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: PC doesn’t have to be shown, just objective reliance on the showing for the issuance of the warrant

NH: Hot pursuit of a suspected murderer with a tracking dog permitted entry onto curtilage

Officers were in hot pursuit after a murder with a tracking dog when they entered defendant’s curtilage. The entry was reasonable under the circumstances. A house can be entered in hot pursuit; this entry onto the curtilage was minimal by … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NH: Hot pursuit of a suspected murderer with a tracking dog permitted entry onto curtilage

KS: Search incident does require actual proof of threat to officer safety, just a reasonable belief it’s a risk

To invoke the search incident doctrine, “the State need not prove that the officer’s safety was actually in jeopardy or that the officer believed his or her safety was in jeopardy before the officer has authority to seize personal property … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on KS: Search incident does require actual proof of threat to officer safety, just a reasonable belief it’s a risk

The Recorder: Breyer: Courthouse Bugs Violate Fourth Amendment

The Recorder: Breyer: Courthouse Bugs Violate Fourth Amendment by Ross Todd: SAN FRANCISCO — A federal judge has barred prosecutors from introducing evidence picked up by recording devices planted outside the San Mateo County courthouse without a warrant. In a … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on The Recorder: Breyer: Courthouse Bugs Violate Fourth Amendment