Author Archives: Hall

CA9: Arrest for any offense will do as long as there were facts for some offense

Following Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146, 153 (2004), “an officer’s ‘subjective reason for making the arrest need not be the criminal offense as to which the known facts provide probable cause.’” Brincken v. Voss, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 21101 … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: Arrest for any offense will do as long as there were facts for some offense

FourthAmendment.com makes 10th Annual ABA Journal’s Blawg100 (now two years in a row)

The tally of law blogs in our directory has topped 4,000. We present to you our latest roundup of the 100 most compelling ones. Described thusly: FourthAmendment.com The evidentiary rules of search and seizure—and the police power to carry out … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FourthAmendment.com makes 10th Annual ABA Journal’s Blawg100 (now two years in a row)

Treatise 30% off through 12/2 11:59pt

Treatise 30% off through 12/2 11:59pt, see here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 30% off through 12/2 11:59pt

WaPo: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law

WaPo: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law by Orin Kerr (posted November 23): Last week, at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention, I was on an excellent panel about Justice Antonin Scalia and criminal law. My co-panelists were Rachel … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law

MS: Delay for dog sniff doesn’t seem to matter in Mississippi if the dog is already there

The court holds essentially that it didn’t matter whether there was reasonable suspicion or not for a dog sniff after a traffic stop. Also, there’s no ineffective assistance claim to a forfeiture. In re One Hundred Thirtyseven Thousand Three Hundred … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MS: Delay for dog sniff doesn’t seem to matter in Mississippi if the dog is already there

CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record

Defendant’s frisk for weapons was justified because there was reasonable suspicion he had drugs in a backpack that had been deposited in an apartment, which defendant lied about going to. Drugs and firearms “go hand in hand,” (See, e.g., United … Continue reading →

Posted in Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA7: RS of drugs in a backpack was justification for frisk for gun; taking key to do a protective sweep of apt before seeking consent was valid on this record

N.D.Cal.: Officers knew or should have known target location was multifamily; SW for gun in one unit didn’t permit search of all five

“The issue in defendant Josue Olman Martinez’s motion to suppress is whether it was reasonable for officers to continue to search a property that they may have initially assumed was a single family residence once they knew or should have … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Scope of search | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Officers knew or should have known target location was multifamily; SW for gun in one unit didn’t permit search of all five

E.D.N.C.: CSLI warrant didn’t show PC on informant information or timeliness; GFE did not apply

The prospective CSLI warrant failed to show probable cause on the facts of informant hearsay or overcome staleness, and the motion to suppress is granted. (Also, the owner of a cell phone has standing to challenge GPS tracking of his … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: CSLI warrant didn’t show PC on informant information or timeliness; GFE did not apply

SD: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into def’s apartment in case there was an injured victim inside

Exigent circumstances supported the warrantless entry into defendant’s apartment. A witness told the police he’d been asked to move a body and he did move a heavy suitcase, big enough to hold the body of a woman. He didn’t know … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on SD: Exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry into def’s apartment in case there was an injured victim inside

E.D.N.C.: No PC for GPS information from any phone that connected to the target phone; and no GFE

“Because the first pen order allowed officers to retrieve GPS location information about any phone which contacted the target phones, and nothing in the affidavit shows the relation between those contacting phones and the underlying criminal activity, the magistrate judge … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: No PC for GPS information from any phone that connected to the target phone; and no GFE

E.D.Tenn.: Consent in the face of a parole search condition isn’t involuntary

Defendant’s consent to a search when confronted with the fact he was subject to a parole search doesn’t make it involuntary. United States v. Foster, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161940 (E.D.Tenn. Sept. 28, 2016). The California federal court’s supervised release … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Consent in the face of a parole search condition isn’t involuntary

AZ: No state const’l right to RS for a parole search; good policy reasons for suspicionless parole searches

In a wide ranging opinion on parole searches, the Arizona court holds that there is no Fourth Amendment or state constitutional requirement of reasonable suspicion for a parole search. There are good policy reasons for suspicionless searches. State v. Adair, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on AZ: No state const’l right to RS for a parole search; good policy reasons for suspicionless parole searches

IA: Dog alert on car and search of car that produces nothing permits search of the person who was sitting where the dog alerted

After seeing a woman with a backpack run to a car with the engine running in an empty parking lot of a closed business, the officer decided to inquire. They had inconsistent stories about where they’d been and what they … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Dog alert on car and search of car that produces nothing permits search of the person who was sitting where the dog alerted

UT: Roommates had apparent authority to consent to search of a room they seldom entered, but they could, and that’s the point

The state had two justifications for the entry. First, the other occupants had the ability to consent to entry into the room even though they didn’t regularly go there. Second, blood on the floor showed exigency. Met v. State, 2016 … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on UT: Roommates had apparent authority to consent to search of a room they seldom entered, but they could, and that’s the point

S.D.Fla.: Collective knowledge requires that the stopping officers have some knowledge of the reason for the stop

Collective knowledge doesn’t apply where the officers making the stop were not informed of what the DEA didn’t communicate. The stop was, however, valid based on traffic violations. The drug dog showed up while the main part of the traffic … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Collective knowledge requires that the stopping officers have some knowledge of the reason for the stop

E.D. Tenn.: “Premises” in the broad consent to search form is interpreted to include vehicles parked outside

The use of “premises” in the broad consent to search form is interpreted to include vehicles parked outside near the house. United States v. Foster, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161550 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2016). “The record contains no evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on E.D. Tenn.: “Premises” in the broad consent to search form is interpreted to include vehicles parked outside

IA: Ordering def off his porch and out to the driveway is a seizure

“[W]e conclude that White was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when Officer Stricker directed White to step off of the front porch and onto the driveway. We reach this conclusion for several reasons. …” State v. White, … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Ordering def off his porch and out to the driveway is a seizure

OH3: Showing of PC justified nexus to SW for def’s home

There was probable cause to believe that evidence of defendant’s gambling and money laundering would be found in his home because he could store records at home and run his business from there. State v. Robinson, 2016-Ohio-7823, 2016 Ohio App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on OH3: Showing of PC justified nexus to SW for def’s home

OH3: Burning MJ on lot next to def, with his admission to firefighters it was his MJ and fire, justified knock-and-talk

The fire department was called to an open burn, and the police came along, too. There was the apparent smell of burning marijuana. The officers went to the nearest structure next door for a knock-and-talk about the burning marijuana. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk | Comments Off on OH3: Burning MJ on lot next to def, with his admission to firefighters it was his MJ and fire, justified knock-and-talk

WaPo: “The Volokh Conspiracy” Blog: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law

WaPo: “The Volokh Conspiracy” Blog: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law by Orin Kerr: “He had a big impact on its form, but less impact on its substance. Or so I argued in a recent panel at the Federalist … Continue reading →

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on WaPo: “The Volokh Conspiracy” Blog: Justice Scalia’s impact on Fourth Amendment law