The use of “premises” in the broad consent to search form is interpreted to include vehicles parked outside near the house. United States v. Foster, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161550 (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 22, 2016).
“The record contains no evidence of any relationship between the defendant and the woman to whom the motel room was registered, and no evidence that the defendant had permission to be in the motel room. Thus, the County Court properly ruled that the defendant had no standing to challenge the warrantless search by police officers of that motel room.” People v. Collins, 2016 NY Slip Op 07975, 2016 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7814 (2d Dept. Nov. 23, 2016).*