Author Archives: Hall

ND unconstitutionally shifts burden of proof to def to show she was not seized

A car with two passengers was pulled over for a headlight violaiton, and the driver gave a false name and had a warrant. She was arrested. A drug dog was called. The defendant passenger was free to leave at the … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof | Comments Off on ND unconstitutionally shifts burden of proof to def to show she was not seized

ND: Entry by bail bond bounty hunters with police at perimeter declining to help was a private search

Three bail bond bounty hunters arrived at defendant’s house to take defendant’s brother into custody. Getting no response at the door, they called police for backup. Officers arrived and confirmed that they had a warrant for defendant’s brother and agreed … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search | Comments Off on ND: Entry by bail bond bounty hunters with police at perimeter declining to help was a private search

NYTimes: U.S. Citizen Detained by Mistake Sues Miami-Dade Over Immigration Enforcement

NYTimes: U.S. Citizen Detained by Mistake Sues Miami-Dade Over Immigration Enforcement by Caitlin Dickerson: Immigration lawyers in Miami-Dade County are challenging its practice of jailing people on behalf of federal immigration authorities, in a case that could test the Trump … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on NYTimes: U.S. Citizen Detained by Mistake Sues Miami-Dade Over Immigration Enforcement

Techno Examiner: Facebook Gag Order For User Account Search Warrants

Techno Examiner: Facebook Gag Order For User Account Search Warrants by Juliana Dante:

Posted in E-mail, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Techno Examiner: Facebook Gag Order For User Account Search Warrants

IA declines to abandon automobile exception just because of availability of electronic warrants

Iowa declines to abandon the automobile exception just because technological advances make it possible to apply for telephone or email warrants from the scene of a search. Other states attempted that and reverted back to the automobile exception. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on IA declines to abandon automobile exception just because of availability of electronic warrants

OH2: Motion to suppress was vague and def didn’t clarify at hearing; appeal argument waived

The motion to suppress was vague, and defendant got a hearing. When the prosecutor complained about the vagueness and what the issues were, defense counsel didn’t elaborate. On appeal, the issues were more focused. The court of appeals takes this … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH2: Motion to suppress was vague and def didn’t clarify at hearing; appeal argument waived

IA: Breath test of boater was valid as search incident under 4A but not state const.

“[T]he breath test [of a boater] constituted a search incident to arrest excepted from the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement under Birchfield.” State v. Pettijohn, 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 78 (June 30, 2017):

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Search incident, State constitution | Comments Off on IA: Breath test of boater was valid as search incident under 4A but not state const.

CA11: No CoA for 2255 where no 4A IAC because search was valid

CoA denied 2255 petitioner because the search was valid on the merits, so defense counsel couldn’t be ineffective. Smith v. United States, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 11902 (11th Cir. Jan. 9, 2017) (order).* State law governs state officers; federal law … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on CA11: No CoA for 2255 where no 4A IAC because search was valid

The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy

The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy by Karen Abbott

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The New Yorker: The Bootlegger, the Wiretap, and the Beginning of Privacy

CA11: Recent murder-robbery made entry into defendant’s house “sufficiently exigent”

The police knew that defendant had “recently” committed an armed robbery and murder, and that he was in his house and armed. They determined to enter and arrest him, and they did. The protective sweep and consent after that was … Continue reading →

Posted in Hot pursuit | Comments Off on CA11: Recent murder-robbery made entry into defendant’s house “sufficiently exigent”

OR: Generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside

Court reaffirms that generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside. State v. Winn, 361 Ore. 636, 2017 Ore. LEXIS 422 (June 29, 2017). … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OR: Generalized consent to open and look in a purse at a courthouse entrance is not per se consent to search a closed container inside

E.D.Wis.: Doesn’t matter that Google stores E-mails offshore

The fact the server on which the emails sought by the government are outside the United States doesn’t mean that the government can’t get them by valid process. The court declines to follow Matter of Warrant to Search a Certain … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Doesn’t matter that Google stores E-mails offshore

E.D.Tenn.: No IAC where nothing from unchallenged alleged illegal search was put used at trial

Defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress where nothing from the search was put into evidence at defendant’s trial. There is no prejudice. Jordan v. United States, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102698 (E.D. Tenn. July … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: No IAC where nothing from unchallenged alleged illegal search was put used at trial

Army CCA: Def showed IAC from defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress; failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference

Defendant on post-conviction showed that trial defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress for failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference. United States v. Close, 2017 CCA LEXIS 432 (Army Ct. Crim. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Nexus | Comments Off on Army CCA: Def showed IAC from defense counsel’s decision to forgo a motion to suppress; failure to show nexus was unreasoned and entitled to no Strickland deference

OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

Consent was granted by someone the police reasonably believed had apparent authority to consent to a search of defendant’s bedroom [no facts given to see how there’s third party consent to a bedroom, so this is immediately suspect]. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent | Comments Off on OH1: Apparent authority shown for third party consent to search of def’s bedroom

CAAF: Attenuation not shown and ER applies: officer conducted ‘unwise, avoidable, and unlawful’ investigation and arrest

Defendant’s arrest was unlawful and the government failed to show attenuation. “However, we do not think it necessary that the agent’s misconduct be outrageous for the third factor in Brown to apply. Though there is no evidence of bad motive … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation | Comments Off on CAAF: Attenuation not shown and ER applies: officer conducted ‘unwise, avoidable, and unlawful’ investigation and arrest

Two rejected IAC claims, one for lack of a record yet

Defendant’s Fourth Amendment claim was not presented to the trial court, and the court declines to reach it on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim for lack of a record. He can do that later. Shinstock v. State, 2017 Miss. … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on Two rejected IAC claims, one for lack of a record yet

IN recognizes a temporal limit on delaying stops with RS

Defendant was seen in a park wearing a gang color shirt and was a suspected truant, although the officer didn’t act on it. Hours later, after school, defendant was seen again with a group wearing red except his red shirt … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN recognizes a temporal limit on delaying stops with RS

TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

The smell of marijuana coming from defendant’s car, never found in a search of the car, didn’t justify a search of his person while he was handcuffed and sitting on the curb. Meane v. State, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 5976 … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on TX1: Smell of MJ in car not found didn’t support search of pockets

NH: Limited state auto exception recognized where plainly visible contents are contraband

NH recognizes limited state automobile exception under state constitution where a warrant is not required where “the police have probable cause to believe that a plainly visible item in the vehicle is contraband.” State v. Cora, 2017 N.H. LEXIS 132 … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception, State constitution | Comments Off on NH: Limited state auto exception recognized where plainly visible contents are contraband