Author Archives: Hall

Trial the rest of week, so postings likely late

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Trial the rest of week, so postings likely late

MN: Officer’s entry on def’s property to look at serial number of an allegedly stolen camper violated curtilage; entry suppressed

Defendant was a suspect in having a stolen pop-up camper on his property. The victim saw it and called the police. The police entered to look at the serial number on the camper, but it was curtilage under Dunn. The … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on MN: Officer’s entry on def’s property to look at serial number of an allegedly stolen camper violated curtilage; entry suppressed

Treatise 25% off through Friday midnight PT

Treatise 25% off through Friday midnight PT.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise 25% off through Friday midnight PT

D.Utah: Shooting of def in court attempting to stab witness on stand with a pen was reasonable use of force

The CSO shooting plaintiff’s decedent in the courtroom was reasonable under all the circumstances as a matter of law, shooting him four times in quick succession after he came over the rail around the witness box. Decedent grabbed defense counsel’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on D.Utah: Shooting of def in court attempting to stab witness on stand with a pen was reasonable use of force

NJ: Def was interrogated in DA’s office; inventory of her purse after lawyering up was unreasonable

Defendant was detained and being interviewed at the local DA’s office. She’d rummaged in her purse without restriction, and it was open on the table. She looked at her cell phone for the time and commented that she had to … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory | Comments Off on NJ: Def was interrogated in DA’s office; inventory of her purse after lawyering up was unreasonable

CA9: Officer putting gun to head of handcuffed compliant suspect and threatening to kill him was excessive force, but QI applied

“Examining the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the non-moving party on summary judgment, the panel assumed that the police officer did indeed point his gun at plaintiff’s head and threatened to kill him. The panel held that … Continue reading →

Posted in Due process, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Officer putting gun to head of handcuffed compliant suspect and threatening to kill him was excessive force, but QI applied

MO: No REP in a dilapidated broken down trailer on rural property without any secure walls, roof, or floor

Defendant worked for a tree service that had a rural place where they burned tree debris. There was a broken down trailer on the property that had missing walls, partially missing roof and a rotting floor where defendant changed clothes. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on MO: No REP in a dilapidated broken down trailer on rural property without any secure walls, roof, or floor

N.D.Ill.: Accidentally transmitted private conversation wasn’t a search

Plaintiff had a conversation near a malfunctioning Motorola handheld radio that transmitted their conversation to the Illinois State Police that was recorded in due course, and then the conversation was passed on resulting in job discipline. The recipients did not … Continue reading →

Posted in Search | Comments Off on N.D.Ill.: Accidentally transmitted private conversation wasn’t a search

NYTimes: Customer Faces Get Scanned at Madison Square Garden

NYTimes: Customer Faces Get Scanned at Madison Square Garden by Kevin Draper:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYTimes: Customer Faces Get Scanned at Madison Square Garden

CA5: TX sanctuary cities law is not enjoined pending trial; law not shown unconstitutional in all its applications

Texas’s sanctuary cities law (SB4) is not enjoined pending trial. Plaintiffs do not show that the law is unconstitutional in all its applications. City of El Cenizo, Texas v. State of Texas, 17-50762 (5th Cir. Mar. 13, 2018):

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CA5: TX sanctuary cities law is not enjoined pending trial; law not shown unconstitutional in all its applications

MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

The 2008 CSLI warrant here was based on a “conclusory statement” of witness statements being credible and “bereft of the factual details required to establish probable cause.” It had to be suppressed. (Based on Fourth Amendment and state constitution.) Commonwealth … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MA: CSLI warrant based on unsupported hearsay suppressed

MA: Alternative inference to facts not drawn by hearing judge doesn’t permit reversal

An alternative interpretation of a witness’s testimony at a suppression hearing not drawn by the judge hearing the motion doesn’t permit reversal. Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, 2018 Mass. App. LEXIS 28 (Mar. 12, 2018).* Plaintiff’s complaint against a judge for an … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Standards of review | Comments Off on MA: Alternative inference to facts not drawn by hearing judge doesn’t permit reversal

NE: Because of direct evidence def was involved in crime, computer search history was harmless error, if error at all

Defendant challenged the search for lack of probable cause of the search history of his computer that produced evidence he searched for violent pornographic videos that matched how the victim was killed. There was direct evidence he was involved in … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on NE: Because of direct evidence def was involved in crime, computer search history was harmless error, if error at all

M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

Defendant lacked standing in the car a gun was found in. He was free to use the car when he wanted, but he wasn’t at the time of the search. It was his grandfather’s car, there was one key, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on M.D.La.: Where def shared a car with one key, he had no standing when it was searched when he was out of possession

Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People

Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People by Alex Yablon It’s not the way President Trump suggested.

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on Politico: The Legal Way to Seize Guns From Dangerous People

W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

The officer pulled up behind defendant’s parked car. “[T]he Court concludes that the officers pulling up behind the parked vehicle constituted a mere encounter that did not ripen into a seizure for Fourth Amendment purposes until Sergeant Spangler ordered Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Ordering occupants to stay in parked car officer pulled up behind was a seizure, but with RS

CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

“Cody failed to state a Fourth Amendment claim for relief. He claimed that the defendants violated his Fourth Amendment rights by removing property from his cell during routine searches. But Cody was in prison, and ‘the Fourth Amendment proscription against … Continue reading →

Posted in Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on CA6: 4A doesn’t apply to removal of stuff from an inmate’s cell after a shakedown search

S.D.Ohio: Def was driver for drug dealer selling from car; a trash pull from his house was sufficient to show nexus

More was shown than just that defendant was a drug dealer. He was the driver for a man who regularly did drug deals and he watched them all go down. He was seen leaving a house attributed to him in … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Search | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Def was driver for drug dealer selling from car; a trash pull from his house was sufficient to show nexus

S.D.Ind.: The sole fact of being a drug trafficker doesn’t provide nexus to house; something has to be shown, and it wasn’t and GFE doesn’t apply

Being a drug trafficker is not enough to search defendant’s home. The government had to show nexus, and it never did anywhere in the affidavit for search warrant. The affidavit for the search warrant was, in fact, so lacking in … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: The sole fact of being a drug trafficker doesn’t provide nexus to house; something has to be shown, and it wasn’t and GFE doesn’t apply

OH12: Father’s admission of using heroin justified hair follicle testing in custody matter

The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in ordering hair follicle testing of the father because of his admissions he’d used heroin. Hatfield v. Cornell, 2018-Ohio-798, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 840 (12th Dist. Mar. 5, 2018). Defendant’s Franks challenge … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on OH12: Father’s admission of using heroin justified hair follicle testing in custody matter