Author Archives: Hall

M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

The government didn’t meet its burden of showing the emergency aid exception applied where all the purported victims were accounted for and outside the apartment they wanted to search. The protective sweep doctrine as an alternative doesn’t apply here because … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Emergency aid exception doesn’t apply to justify entry where victims are accounted for outside

Family emergency took me away. New cases again tomorrow

As soon as I get back I have to prepare for a 5 pm hearing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Family emergency took me away. New cases again tomorrow

Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America”

Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America” by Patrick G. Eddington

Posted in Immigration checkpoints | Comments Off on Cato: Introducing “Checkpoint: America”

Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts

Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts by Alison Frankel:

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Reuters: Law firm raids bode ill for lawyers and their clients – legal experts

Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment

Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment by Orin Kerr: Requiring a search warrant isn’t everything. But it isn’t nothing.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: In Decryption Cases, Don’t Forget the Fourth Amendment

Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up

Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up by Lily Hay Newman:

Posted in Cell site simulators | Comments Off on Wired: DC’s Stingray Mess Won’t Get Cleaned Up

OH8: Administrative PC shown for sewer water search

The city justified issuance of an administrative warrant for investigation of sewer water contamination under Camara. Administrative probable cause was shown, and the search was reasonable. Dawson v. City of Richmond Heights, 2018-Ohio-1301, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 1440 (8th Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on OH8: Administrative PC shown for sewer water search

E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

Defendants were kicked out of a hotel room for strange and aggressive behavior toward staff, and they hurriedly left. The hotel opened the room to the police and they found drug paraphernalia and, in the toilet, ammunition. There no longer … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Consent, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Having been kicked out of a hotel room and leaving, defs essentially abandoned that which was left behind

Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr

Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr One on the Fifth Amendment, and one on Miranda. Both correctly decided, I think.

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on Volokh Conspiracy: Two New Cases on Decrypting Locked Devices by Orin Kerr

IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

Police encountered defendant and others in a car in a neighborhood where it didn’t seem to belong. The officers pulled up next to their car and talked. Based on furtive movements, the officer believed that defendant had a gun he … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on IL: Def’s actions after stop to inquire rose to RS

OH9: GPS tracking previously imposed for parole wasn’t a violation of 4A

GPS tracking as a condition of parole was based in substantial part on findings in a prior sentencing involving defendant, and that did not violate the Fourth Amendment in imposing those release conditions. That GPS information was used in this … Continue reading →

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH9: GPS tracking previously imposed for parole wasn’t a violation of 4A

CA11: Ten officers for a “knock and talk” violated Jardines, but it wasn’t the cause of the search of the house

Ten officers approaching defendant’s house for a “knock-and-talk” violated Jardines, but that doesn’t matter because it didn’t lead to the discovery of evidence. Defendant didn’t see them, and he opened the door in response to the knock. Then the officer … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Independent source, Knock and talk | Comments Off on CA11: Ten officers for a “knock and talk” violated Jardines, but it wasn’t the cause of the search of the house

TN: There’s normally no reason why the judge that issued the SW would be a witness at a suppression hearing on a Franks motion

The judge that issued the search warrant is not required to recuse from being the trial judge, so there was no ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to raise that issue. Moreover, the issuing judge would not be a witness … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: There’s normally no reason why the judge that issued the SW would be a witness at a suppression hearing on a Franks motion

D.S.C.: Considering the totality, there was no RS for defs’ detention for a dog sniff

“After consideration of the testimony presented during multiple lengthy suppression hearings, a thorough analysis of the relevant caselaw, and a careful review of the dashcam video of the traffic stop, the court grants the motion to suppress. The court finds … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Considering the totality, there was no RS for defs’ detention for a dog sniff

NV: Even if PBT was a 4A violation, SW was moot because there was both PC and exigency for warrantless search

The trial court erred in suppressing the telephonic search warrant for defendant’s blood. Even if the PBT was unconstitutional, there was both probable cause and exigent circumstances without even considering it. State v. Sample, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 23, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NV: Even if PBT was a 4A violation, SW was moot because there was both PC and exigency for warrantless search

The Hill: Manafort challenges evidence seized by Mueller (with link to motion and warrant affidavit)

The Hill: Manafort challenges evidence seized by Mueller by Jacqueline Thomsen (link to motion, affidavit, and warrant):

Posted in Consent, Overbreadth, Overseizure | Comments Off on The Hill: Manafort challenges evidence seized by Mueller (with link to motion and warrant affidavit)

CA6: When an anticipatory SW says delivery to X, X has to receive it for search to occur

When the triggering event in an anticipatory search warrant doesn’t occur, then the search can’t occur. Here it was to a named person. Somebody else accepting it isn’t acceptable. “In this case, requiring delivery to Perkins is the only common … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant | Comments Off on CA6: When an anticipatory SW says delivery to X, X has to receive it for search to occur

N.D.Ind.: A motion for new trial is too late to raise new grounds to suppress

Defendant litigated a motion to suppress and lost. In a motion for new trial, he raised new grounds, and this is rejected as untimely. United States v. Bishop, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57353 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 4, 2018). Defendant’s stop … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: A motion for new trial is too late to raise new grounds to suppress

N.D.Ohio: There was a fair inference business records would be at def’s house

When a white collar investigation is underway, the staleness inquiry is more flexible because records, as opposed to drugs, are regularly kept for a long time. It was reasonable here to conclude that business records would be found at defendant’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Nexus, Staleness | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: There was a fair inference business records would be at def’s house

NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible

“Sufficient credible evidence supported the trial court’s determination that defendant was given an adequate opportunity to present the vehicle’s registration before the search commenced. When a driver is unwilling or unable to present proof of a vehicle’s ownership, a police … Continue reading →

Posted in Automobile exception | Comments Off on NJ: When driver can’t or won’t produce registration, a limited search for it is permissible