Author Archives: Hall

W.D.Tex.: In CA5, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule

In the Fifth Circuit, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule. United States v. Meza-Gonzalez, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63254 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 16, 2018). Defendant fails on the second prong of Franks: excising the … Continue reading →

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: In CA5, a person’s identity and nationality is not subject to the exclusionary rule

W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

A DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978, 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422 (“RFPA”). “Having carefully reviewed the United States’ detailed response, the Court finds that there is a reasonable belief that the records sought are … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: DOJ subpoena issued under the Right to Financial Privacy Act was “relevant to [a] law enforcement inquiry”

Cohen pleadings online for today’s hearing in S.D.N.Y.

Two pleadings are online in Cohen v. United States, 1:18-mj-03161-KMW (S.D. N.Y.). A reply by Cohen may be filed today. Read them. The Government has the better argument. I don’t see Cohen’s argument against a “filter team” even in the … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Cohen pleadings online for today’s hearing in S.D.N.Y.

OH2: Description of “things to be seized” couldn’t be more particular

The search warrant for child pornography was particular and not overbroad. No more particular description was reasonably expected. “Under the circumstances, the search warrant could not reasonably have described the items more precisely.” Defendant’s search residence was in Wisconsin, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity | Comments Off on OH2: Description of “things to be seized” couldn’t be more particular

IN: Def’s backpack would have been searched anyway, so inevitable discovery applied

Inevitable discovery applied to the search of defendant’s backpack. He was arrested, and the search would have occurred as a result of that. The merits of defendant’s search claim is thus moot. Winborn v. State, 2018 Ind. App. LEXIS 133 … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on IN: Def’s backpack would have been searched anyway, so inevitable discovery applied

N.D.Tex.: RS came from “extreme nervousness, conflicting stories, and the fact that he was traveling along a drug trafficking corridor”

“The government proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Trooper Styles developed reasonable suspicion of additional criminal activity during the initial stop and before Roberts consented to Trooper Styles’s request to search the Jeep. The facts of this case … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: RS came from “extreme nervousness, conflicting stories, and the fact that he was traveling along a drug trafficking corridor”

D.Neb.: Unwarned questioning about control of a bedroom wasn’t custodial

UnMirandized questioning about defendant’s control of a bedroom was a close call, but not found not custodial. “This case presents a close call. On balance, the Court concludes that under Muniz and Fleck and the circumstances of this case, Sergeant … Continue reading →

Posted in Custody, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Unwarned questioning about control of a bedroom wasn’t custodial

CA9: On the scene determination of PC justified arreat and detention for 47 hours, despite later dismissal

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest based on the officer’s on the scene determination. He was held 47 hours and released. The jury in the civil case found for the defendants, and the district court did not abuse its … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: On the scene determination of PC justified arreat and detention for 47 hours, despite later dismissal

Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples

Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples By Harry Larson & Sabrina McCubbin

Posted in Warrant execution | Comments Off on Lawfare: Prosecuting Attorneys Alongside Clients: Some Recent Examples

OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants

OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants by Maxine Bernstein

Posted in Sneak and Peek | Comments Off on OregonLive.com: Oregon is No. 2 in nation in requests for ‘sneak-and-peek’ search warrants

The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals

The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals by Zach Needles: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether it’s unconstitutional for a DUI suspect’s refusal of a warrantless blood draw … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on The Legal Intelligencer: Justices to Eye Constitutionality of Consequences for DUI Blood Test Refusals

Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law

Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law by Greg Land: Two veteran lawyers, former State Bar of Georgia President Robin Frazer Clark and prosecutor-turned-defense attorney Noah Pines, differed sharply in their views of Georgia’s illegal surveillance statute … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent | Comments Off on Daily Report: Sex Tape Verdict Spurs Debate on Surveillance Law

UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

The two CI’s stories were weak in themselves, but the police succeeded in corroborating enough to rise to probable cause. State v. Matheson, 2018 Utah App. LEXIS 66 (Apr. 13, 2018).* Hitting the lane dividing line was justification for the … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, Staleness | Comments Off on UT: While the CI’s stories alone were weak, police corroborated them

W.D.N.C.: Roadblock near scene of home invasion robbery was reasonable

Police set up a perimeter a distance around the scene of a home invasion looking for the car involved, and defendant’s car was stopped. This checkpoint stop was valid under Illinois v. Lidster. United States v. Gilmore, 2018 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on W.D.N.C.: Roadblock near scene of home invasion robbery was reasonable

FL2: Def stopped in the driveway where package of MJ was to delivered was without RS

“A mysterious parcel package was intercepted while en route to be delivered. It contained approximately ten pounds of marijuana. Someone sent the package. Someone was presumably going to pick it up. The principal question this appeal presents is whether investigating … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL2: Def stopped in the driveway where package of MJ was to delivered was without RS

CA9: MMJ card didn’t undermine PC for possession

The arrest was based on probable cause to believe marijuana would be found. The existence of a medical marijuana card is only a defense to the holder, and it doesn’t undermine probable cause. Assenberg v. Whitman County, 2018 U.S. App. … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Drug or alcohol testing, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA9: MMJ card didn’t undermine PC for possession

D.Kan.: Description of thing to be seized as a firearm wasn’t fatal where weapon of mass destruction was being sought

A Facebook warrant wasn’t overbroad because it involved a conspiracy and it was thus more difficult to describe what exactly was sought. As to a dwelling warrant, an error in the description of the thing to be seized as a … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Description of thing to be seized as a firearm wasn’t fatal where weapon of mass destruction was being sought

Thinking:

Col. Abel to his lawyer: Abel: Standing there like that you reminded me of the man that used to come to our house when I was young. My father used to say: “watch this man”. So I did. Every time … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Thinking:

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications by Alan Dershowitz: The Fifth Amendment merely prohibits the use of illegally obtained self-incriminatory information at the defendant’s criminal trial. The Fourth Amendment prohibits unlawful intrusions into the privacy … Continue reading →

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on The Hill: We need a new law to protect lawyer-client communications

Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line

Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line by Benjamin Wittes: If the president can, with impunity, remove the deputy attorney general, the very notion that law enforcement has a higher function than serving power becomes … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Atlantic: The Principle of Professional Law Enforcement Is Now on the Line