Author Archives: Hall

CA11: Ptf’s claim officers falsified seizure of crack was speculative; MSJ properly granted

Plaintiff was the subject of a search for drugs, and officers at first found only marijuana. In defendant’s kitchen, in a coffee maker, officers found what they believed was a rock of crack cocaine. It was submitted to the crime … Continue reading →

Posted in Police misconduct | Comments Off on CA11: Ptf’s claim officers falsified seizure of crack was speculative; MSJ properly granted

CA5: Protective sweep of bedroom def was going in was valid, but rest of house was not

Defendant did not consent to a search for his firearms. The seizure of one from his bedroom was valid because it was justified by officer safety that he was going into the bedroom to get dressed, and officers looked there … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA5: Protective sweep of bedroom def was going in was valid, but rest of house was not

MI: Policy to photograph and fingerprint detainees violated 4A and stated claim against city

The Grand Rapids Police Department has a policy permitting officers to photograph and fingerprint people who are stopped just because they want to. The plaintiffs stated a claim for relief against the city for its policy. Johnson v. Vanderkooi, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on MI: Policy to photograph and fingerprint detainees violated 4A and stated claim against city

CA6: SW’s flexibility as to when it could be executed didn’t make it an anticipatory warrant with a triggering condition

The search warrant reasonably provided flexibility as to when it would be executed, but it was not an anticipatory warrant at all. United States v. Huntley, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 20956 (6th Cir. July 30, 2018):

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: SW’s flexibility as to when it could be executed didn’t make it an anticipatory warrant with a triggering condition

D.Kan.: Appellate counsel’s declining to appeal “including but not limited to” in the search warrant was not IAC

Appellate counsel’s declining to appeal the use of the phrase “including but not limited to” in the search warrant was not unreasonable because, as defendant admits, it does not per se lead to unreasonable searches. United States v. Ransom, 2018 … Continue reading →

Posted in Independent source, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Appellate counsel’s declining to appeal “including but not limited to” in the search warrant was not IAC

D.N.M.: Def lived with his grandfather, and the “presumption of consent” in a familial relationship was apparent to officers

Defendant lived with his grandfather, and the familial relationship is different than that of a co-tenant. The evidence apparent to the officers was that the grandfather had control of the premises, and the grandson slept either in a bedroom or … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Def lived with his grandfather, and the “presumption of consent” in a familial relationship was apparent to officers

OH2: Ptf’s claims decided in criminal case were res judicata to civil case over same search

Res judicata barred plaintiff’s claims against the county for illegal search already decided against him in the criminal case. Cooper v. Montgomery County Sheriff, 2018-Ohio-2965, 2018 Ohio App. LEXIS 3208 (2d Dist. July 27, 2018). “Based on the totality of … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH2: Ptf’s claims decided in criminal case were res judicata to civil case over same search

KS: Warning officers about self-incrimination at suppression hearing deterrent enough; no exclusion

Kansas police officers can go outside their jurisdiction when requested to do so. Kansas statute implies an exclusionary remedy. Here, the officers appear to have violated the statute, but the district court warned the officers against self-incrimination at the hearing … Continue reading →

Posted in Anticipatory warrant, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on KS: Warning officers about self-incrimination at suppression hearing deterrent enough; no exclusion

D.Utah: Officers had no objective information supporting exigency for entry

The officers had no objective information that even suggested that a protective sweep was required here, and the warrantless entry into the home was unreasonable. Moreover, the claimed consent wasn’t voluntary. United States v. Lawley, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125920 … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on D.Utah: Officers had no objective information supporting exigency for entry

FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

Police surveilled three motel rooms for drug activity, and finally they procured a search warrant for the three rooms. They also searched the cars associated with those rooms under the theory the cars were within the curtilage of the motel … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause | Comments Off on FL2: Car outside motel room can’t be searched under SW for room; it’s not “curtilage”

D.N.M.: GFE applies to CA10’s Ackerman that NCMEC is not a private searcher

In United States v. Ackerman, 831 F.3d 1292 (10th Cir. 2016), the Tenth Circuit held that NCMEC was not a mere private actor when it opened emails. Defendant’s search was 2012, and the court applies the good faith exception. At … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on D.N.M.: GFE applies to CA10’s Ackerman that NCMEC is not a private searcher

N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under Davis good faith exception. United States v. Hearst, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126005 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 2018), adopted 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125791 (N.D. Ga. July 27, 2018). The search … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Standing | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Pre-Carpenter CSLI obtained without search warrant is admissible under GFE

KS: Pleading facts doesn’t plead specific 4A claims; this specific claim is waived for lack of development below

Defendant’s argument in the district court was that the package was subjected to detention without reasonable suspicion, and he did not argue that the package was detained too long. His statement of facts isn’t enough for the court to have … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading | Comments Off on KS: Pleading facts doesn’t plead specific 4A claims; this specific claim is waived for lack of development below

NY2: Defense counsel not ineffective for not challenging cell phone search that apparently would lose

“Counsel’s failure to challenge the [cell phone] search warrant can be explained as a legitimate trial strategy because the application for the warrant was supported by probable cause, and the warrant was not unconstitutionally overbroad, despite a technical defect on … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on NY2: Defense counsel not ineffective for not challenging cell phone search that apparently would lose

FL4: Parkland school shooting videos obtained by SW subject to state FOIA

After the Parkland FL school shooting, police got a search warrant for all the school video. The news media then made a public records request for it all, which the court found reasonable. “The evidence presented by the Media establishes … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on FL4: Parkland school shooting videos obtained by SW subject to state FOIA

Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts

Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts by Joshua Z. Rokach:

Posted in SCOTUS | Comments Off on Forward: Justice Brandeis Was Right About Technology — 90 Years Before The Courts

ND: No PC for shipped package, but there was for def’s house

Police lacked probable cause for the search warrant for a package defendant was shipping just because they suspected it contained cash for drugs. There were suspicions because of volunteered explanations when he was shipping it, but no probable cause and … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Mail and packages | Comments Off on ND: No PC for shipped package, but there was for def’s house

NE: State dropping count CI was witness in keeps identity under wraps; can’t show materiality to other counts

The CI was used to get the search warrant for drugs in defendant’s house. During the search, the CI said there would be a gun, and officers found it. Later, the state chose not to pursue the drug charge but … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay | Comments Off on NE: State dropping count CI was witness in keeps identity under wraps; can’t show materiality to other counts

CA9: Virtual knowing Franks violation leads to suppression of immigration search before BIA

Petitioner established that the warrant for employment records sought by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office was based on knowingly material omissions and thus qualified as an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment for an immigration proceeding. Frimmel Mgmt. v. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA9: Virtual knowing Franks violation leads to suppression of immigration search before BIA

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them.

WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them. by Radley Balko: After just over a year, we finally have some news about the death … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force | Comments Off on WaPo: ‘The Watch’ Blog: Mississippi cops went to the wrong house and killed an innocent man. A grand jury just refused to indict them.