Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ohio: Corroboration of CI for rectal SW was thin, but GFE applies

Based on a CI that was partially corroborated, officers believed defendant was concealing drugs in his rectum. They obtain a search warrant for a rectal search. The probable cause from the CI is thin. “Basic fairness requires the government to … Continue reading →

Posted in Body searches, Good faith exception | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Corroboration of CI for rectal SW was thin, but GFE applies

W.D.Tex.: RS of a weapon nearby in a car authorizes opening the door

“In this case the officers had either probable cause or reasonable suspicion to open the car doors to substantiate their belief that weapons, drugs and money were in the vehicle. Further, they were authorized to take photographs to inventory the … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Tex.: RS of a weapon nearby in a car authorizes opening the door

WaPo: With fitness trackers in the workplace, bosses can monitor your every step — and possibly more

WaPo: With fitness trackers in the workplace, bosses can monitor your every step — and possibly more by Christopher Rowland:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: With fitness trackers in the workplace, bosses can monitor your every step — and possibly more

CA7: Entrapment defense isn’t relevant to whether controlled buy is PC; it’s a question for trial

Defendant’s assertion of entrapment in a controlled buy is a question for trial. It doesn’t negate the fact that the buy occurred and that probable cause exists. State v. Curtis, 2019-Ohio-499, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 514 (7th Dist. Jan. 25, … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause | Comments Off on CA7: Entrapment defense isn’t relevant to whether controlled buy is PC; it’s a question for trial

OH9: Inadequate findings on officer safety patdown requires remand

The trial court’s findings of an alleged officer safety justification for his patdown are inadequate for the court of appeals to decide whether the state justified the patdown. Remanded for more findings. State v. Murphy, 2019-Ohio-515, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on OH9: Inadequate findings on officer safety patdown requires remand

Two controlled buys: one not done right, one good

The search warrant was based on a controlled buy, but the CI doing the buy was controlled enough to know that what was acquired came from defendant. Therefore, probable cause is lacking, and the good faith exception won’t be applied. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause | Comments Off on Two controlled buys: one not done right, one good

CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

The affidavit for a search warrant for a third person’s home where defendant spent a lot of time was deficient on showing nexus and defendant’s connection to it, but it otherwise showed probable cause. Actually, right after three controlled buys, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Nexus | Comments Off on CA7: SW affidavit failed to show nexus, but it was close enough for GFE

VA: SW tainted by unlawful entry onto the curtilage for a smell

The evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant was tainted by police officers’ initial unlawful entry onto defendant’s curtilage. Without that unlawful entry, the officers had no evidence connecting the marijuana odor to defendant or his residence. In addition, he … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage | Comments Off on VA: SW tainted by unlawful entry onto the curtilage for a smell

CA6: OUI arrest justified search incident for visible beer cans

Defendant’s OUI arrest justified a search incident of the car for beer cans that were visible to the officer. United States v. Latham, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 4188 (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2019). Defendant’s motion for new trial incorporates his … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Search incident | Comments Off on CA6: OUI arrest justified search incident for visible beer cans

Law.com: What’s Next for DNA Privacy: Catching Killers, Ancestry Sites and the Fourth Amendment

Law.com: What’s Next for DNA Privacy: Catching Killers, Ancestry Sites and the Fourth Amendment by Vanessa Blum: A Q&A with Marcia Hofmann of Zeitgeist Law on Fourth Amendment protections, insurance considerations and other legal questions that arise when companies control … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on Law.com: What’s Next for DNA Privacy: Catching Killers, Ancestry Sites and the Fourth Amendment

NYTimes: A Border Agent Detained Two Americans Speaking Spanish. Now They Have Sued.

NYTimes: A Border Agent Detained Two Americans Speaking Spanish. Now They Have Sued. by Liam Stack:

Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on NYTimes: A Border Agent Detained Two Americans Speaking Spanish. Now They Have Sued.

OH5: Officers continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter so consent valid

Defendant’s consent to search was ‘voluntary, uncoerced and valid’ and the detectives continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter, and continued to meet with complete cooperation from defendant. State v. Gomez, 2019-Ohio-481, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 499 (5th Dist. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on OH5: Officers continually refreshed the voluntariness of the encounter so consent valid

W.D.Wash.: State’s response to a public records request wasn’t a search of plaintiff’s records

The state’s responding to a legitimate public records request under state law did not conduct a Fourth Amendment search of plaintiff’s records that came within its purview. Dalessio v. Univ. of Wash., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21907 (W.D. Wash. Feb. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: State’s response to a public records request wasn’t a search of plaintiff’s records

W.D.Mo.: Reaching in def’s car to turn it off wasn’t a search, and plain view of a gun proper

Defendant’s stop was reasonable because the LPN didn’t match the vehicle. His reaching in the car to turn off the ignition was not a search. “As Officer Jenkins was backing out of the vehicle, she looked down and saw what … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Search | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Reaching in def’s car to turn it off wasn’t a search, and plain view of a gun proper

PA: Blocking def’s vehicle showed he wasn’t free to leave, and it lacked RS

“Having determined that Officer Byrne effectuated an investigatory detention upon pulling behind Appellant’s vehicle, and that such detention was not supported by a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot nor excused from constitutional warrant requirements by the public servant … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: Blocking def’s vehicle showed he wasn’t free to leave, and it lacked RS

E.D.Mich.: Affidavit’s misidentifying homeowner wasn’t material to the PC to search

Misidentifying the homeowner in the affidavit for the warrant isn’t material because a search warrant runs against the place and the evidence inside. “The identity of the supposedly-misidentified person is irrelevant to the finding of probable cause to search the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Probable cause, Scope of search | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Affidavit’s misidentifying homeowner wasn’t material to the PC to search

CA11: PC showing in SW affidavit but “we cannot say that the officer’s reliance on the warrant was unreasonable.”

The affidavit for the search warrant didn’t clearly identify defendant as connected to the property or that there was drug trafficking just from the trash pulls, but it showed that there was drug activity. The court cannot say, however, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA11: PC showing in SW affidavit but “we cannot say that the officer’s reliance on the warrant was unreasonable.”

OR: Def ordered from car left purse inside, and it was subject to inventory (update)

Defendant was ordered out of the car, and she left her purse inside. Her purse was legitimately subjected to the inventory since it was left in the car. State v. Fulmer, 296 Ore. App. 61, 2019 Ore. App. LEXIS 190 … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Inventory | Comments Off on OR: Def ordered from car left purse inside, and it was subject to inventory (update)

M.D.Tenn.: PC shown for govt to photograph tattoos on def

“It was reasonable and prudent for Magistrate Judge Brown to issue the search warrant based upon Agent Daniel’s affidavit because that affidavit established at least a ‘fair probability’ that tattoos evidencing affiliation with the Gangster Disciples would be found on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: PC shown for govt to photograph tattoos on def

CA4: 31 day delay in getting SW for cell phone was unreasonable

The government’s 31 day delay in getting a search warrant for defendant’s cell phone after its seizure was unreasonable and required suppression of the alleged child pornography on the phone. Because defendant was sentenced to life, the error was not … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Seizure | Comments Off on CA4: 31 day delay in getting SW for cell phone was unreasonable