Author Archives: Hall

N.D.Ala.: No exigency for entry into home to seize gun for alleged safety of children

The entry into defendant’s house to search for a gun lacked exigent circumstances. There was nothing on which the officers could claim there was any risk. Moreover, defendant didn’t consent to their entry into the home. United States v. Mulato-Herrara, … Continue reading →

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: No exigency for entry into home to seize gun for alleged safety of children

Cal.4: Warrantless seizure of def’s dashcam was reasonable on exigent circumstances; three days to get a SW wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant was convicted of reckless driving with an accident. His dashcam would have a recording of it. The dashcam was reasonably seized without a warrant on exigent circumstances. And, it wasn’t unreasonable to wait three days before getting a search … Continue reading →

Posted in Digital Searches, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on Cal.4: Warrantless seizure of def’s dashcam was reasonable on exigent circumstances; three days to get a SW wasn’t unreasonable

FL2: Anonymous calls about a pick-up truck driving slowly around the block in the middle of the night in a residential low crime area wasn’t RS

Officers received two anonymous calls about a dark pickup truck with a loud muffler on a residential street in the middle of the night. Once it stopped in the street for a few seconds and then pulled off and turned … Continue reading →

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on FL2: Anonymous calls about a pick-up truck driving slowly around the block in the middle of the night in a residential low crime area wasn’t RS

D.D.C.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require that the officers actually share the information

The collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require that the officers actually share the information. United States v. Devaugh, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196059 (D.D.C. Nov. 12, 2019). The use of a “court ordered subpoena” apparently not issued on probable cause was … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Collective knowledge | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Collective knowledge doctrine doesn’t require that the officers actually share the information

NY Daily News: Opinion: Unready for their closeup: The NYPD’s body camera problem

NY Daily News: Opinion: Unready for their closeup: The NYPD’s body camera problem (“Last month, outgoing Police Commissioner Jimmy O’Neill quietly released two pages of long-awaited guidelines outlining how and when video from body cameras all cops now wear shall … Continue reading →

Posted in Body cameras | Comments Off on NY Daily News: Opinion: Unready for their closeup: The NYPD’s body camera problem

WI: Use of a tracking dog in a burglary that led to def’s house was reasonable and in hot pursuit

Police received a 4 am burglary call, and an officer with a dog tracking smell and the officer tracking footprints in the dew on the ground led to defendant’s property. The officer knocked and defendant’s mother let the police in. … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Hot pursuit, Standards of review | Comments Off on WI: Use of a tracking dog in a burglary that led to def’s house was reasonable and in hot pursuit

D.Mass.: Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion

Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion. Alasaad v. NielsenAlasaad v. Nielsen, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195556 (D. Mass. Nov. 12, 2019):

Posted in Border search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Border searches of electronic devices are non-routine, and they require reasonable suspicion

OH5: Merely being drunk in the Sheriff’s Office lobby isn’t a crime justifying a search

Defendant’s being merely drunk in the lobby of the sheriff’s office wasn’t reasonable suspicion of a crime because the officers didn’t see how he got there (i.e., did he drive himself). State v. Mast, 2019-Ohio-4644, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 4698 … Continue reading →

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH5: Merely being drunk in the Sheriff’s Office lobby isn’t a crime justifying a search

E.D.Wash.: Def’s Franks claim is barred on habeas where he knew of it all along

Defendant in his 2255 alleges a Franks violation, but he had the ability and method to do it in the district court before conviction and habeas isn’t the place. United States v. Youker, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 196001 (E.D. Wash. … Continue reading →

Posted in Abstention, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Wash.: Def’s Franks claim is barred on habeas where he knew of it all along

M.D.Pa.: Bank records can’t be equated with CSLI in detail, and a subpoena is constitutionally sufficient

Defendant’s bank records cannot be equated with CSLI such that a search warrant is required rather than a subpoena. As Carpenter says: “Our decision today is a narrow one. … We do not disturb the application of Smith or Miller … Continue reading →

Posted in Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Bank records can’t be equated with CSLI in detail, and a subpoena is constitutionally sufficient

D.Del.: Coast Guard port inspection of an incoming vessel led to RS for a full search

A Coast Guard port inspection of an incoming vessel led to reasonable suspicion for its more detailed search. United States v. Vastardis, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195486 (D. Del. Nov. 12, 2019):

Posted in Border search | Comments Off on D.Del.: Coast Guard port inspection of an incoming vessel led to RS for a full search

NE: Def’s DNA taken in prison for a felony conviction could be used in a new prosecution, and def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it

Defendant was convicted of a sex crime and was required by statute to give a DNA sample thereafter. That DNA sample linked him to the current offense. His lawyer wasn’t ineffective for not challenging its use in his case because … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA | Comments Off on NE: Def’s DNA taken in prison for a felony conviction could be used in a new prosecution, and def counsel wasn’t ineffective for not challenging it

VA: Def lacked standing in the car of his passenger he was driving

Defendant was driving a car that belonged to his passenger, and it was legitimately stopped because of an expired tag. The court gave a long exposé of property rights and standing useful in the future, but not for him because … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on VA: Def lacked standing in the car of his passenger he was driving

VT: Game wardens’ entry on def’s curtilage to investigate deer jacking was reasonable as was look through detached garage window

Defendant was suspected of “deer jacking,” shooting a deer from outside the window of a homeowner before 4 am on Thanksgiving Day 2017. A game warden investigated at the scene finding deer blood and hair. The game warden had a … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on VT: Game wardens’ entry on def’s curtilage to investigate deer jacking was reasonable as was look through detached garage window

D.Idaho: Small business owner with 90% share has standing to challenge search of entire premises

As a 90% owner of a small business and the building in which it was located, an investment firm (and disregarding the assets they managed), he had standing to challenge the entirety of the search of the premises, not just … Continue reading →

Posted in Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Idaho: Small business owner with 90% share has standing to challenge search of entire premises

OR: Ten-year-old information in a SW for evidence of child sexual abuse wasn’t stale

Defendant was convicted of 11 counts of child sexual abuse from acts that occurred at a gymnastic business that had sleepovers of young female gymnasts. In making its case, the state used ten-year-old information in a search warrant application for … Continue reading →

Posted in Staleness | Comments Off on OR: Ten-year-old information in a SW for evidence of child sexual abuse wasn’t stale

D.Utah: Parole search doesn’t extend to car parolee was a passenger in

The parole search of car defendant was a passenger in was invalid because it wasn’t his. United States v. Tafuna, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194829 (D.Utah Oct. 1, 2019):

Posted in Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on D.Utah: Parole search doesn’t extend to car parolee was a passenger in

IA: One-way cross country rental and multiple cell phones wasn’t RS for extending stop

The officer had no reasonable suspicion developed from defendant’s traffic stop. The rental car was a one-way rental in the name of another and defendant had multiple cell phones. The stop, for all intents and purposes, appears strung out to … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: One-way cross country rental and multiple cell phones wasn’t RS for extending stop

OH2: Def’s allegedly carrying a rifle in an apartment building parking lot, even if true, wasn’t RS

A phone call to the police said there was a man walking through an apartment building parking lot carrying a rifle, something that wasn’t a crime. Police responded and saw defendant. They approached him when he wasn’t carrying a rifle, … Continue reading →

Posted in Inventory, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH2: Def’s allegedly carrying a rifle in an apartment building parking lot, even if true, wasn’t RS

OH2: Open-ended consent to search a car includes closed containers, here def’s purse

During a traffic stop, defendant consented to a search of her car. She was out of the car and her purse was inside. The consent was open-ended, and it thus would include closed containers, like her purse in the front … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Scope of search | Comments Off on OH2: Open-ended consent to search a car includes closed containers, here def’s purse