Author Archives: Hall

PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

Defendant would get the benefit of Birchfield because he developed and preserved the same argument below. He loses on the merits, however, because he voluntarily consented before the officer told him of the criminal penalties for refusal, so his consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on PA: Def gets benefit of Birchfield by adequately raising issue before it was even decided; but he loses on merits

CA9: Hernandez bars Bivens claim against false arrest in Thailand U.S. allegedly participated in

“As in Hernandez, ‘it is glaringly obvious that [Hobbs’s] claims involve a new context.’ Id. at 744. And the same extraterritorial concerns that foreclosed a Bivens claim in Hernandez apply here with greater force. Unlike in Hernandez, all of the … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on CA9: Hernandez bars Bivens claim against false arrest in Thailand U.S. allegedly participated in

MO: Alteration of SW application after warrant issued is strongly disapproved of, but here did not undermine PC

A mistake as to the name of the person’s BAC to be searched for and seized in the warrant could be overlooked where it correctly appeared 50 times in the affidavit. The officer’s altering the search warrant application with the … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on MO: Alteration of SW application after warrant issued is strongly disapproved of, but here did not undermine PC

W.D.Mo.: That later police reports would shed more light on affidavit for SW, that’s not a Franks issue

Affidavits for search warrants are presumed to be accurate under Franks, and that’s why the defense has to make a substantial preliminary showing of falsity. Alleging merely that other more timely reports would shed light on the subject is not … Continue reading →

Posted in Abandonment, Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: That later police reports would shed more light on affidavit for SW, that’s not a Franks issue

IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

The CI was the target of a search, and he snitched off defendant as his source for about ten sales, the most recent the day before. That was a statement against penal interest. State v. Stone, 2020 Ind. App. LEXIS … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: CI’s statement he bought from def ten times was a statement against penal interest

S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

The information for the search warrant was not stale: “In this light, the information about child abuse was not stale. Indeed, the character of the alleged crime—abuse of a child—was grounds for continuing concern.” As to continuing a traffic stop: … Continue reading →

Posted in Private search, Staleness | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Child abuse allegation isn’t stale because it’s of “continuing concern”

CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA

“The central question here is whether Transportation Security Administration (TSA) screening personnel, known as Transportation Security Officers (TSOs), satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer. Holding that they do, we reverse and remand.” “Two of our … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Standing | Comments Off on CA8: TSA’s officers “satisfy the FTCA’s definition of an investigative or law enforcement officer” for FTCA

EFF: New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional

EFF: New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional by Jennifer Lynch and Nathaniel Sobel:

Posted in geofence | Comments Off on EFF: New Federal Court Rulings Find Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional

The Appeal: Highway Stop-And-Frisk: How Pennsylvania State Troopers Conduct Illegal Traffic Searches

The Appeal: Highway Stop-And-Frisk: How Pennsylvania State Troopers Conduct Illegal Traffic Searches (“A review of five years of cases that arose from traffic stops in the south-central region of the state shows that police used underhand tactics to justify holding … Continue reading →

Posted in Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on The Appeal: Highway Stop-And-Frisk: How Pennsylvania State Troopers Conduct Illegal Traffic Searches

HI: Local police dept’s implied consent form was accurate

On the totality, defendant’s consent to BAC testing was voluntary. The police department’s implied consent form was accurate. State v. Hosaka, 2020 Haw. LEXIS 256 (Aug. 28, 2020)*:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on HI: Local police dept’s implied consent form was accurate

M.D.Pa.: Govt’s justification for protective sweep or exigency based entry were speculative so motion to suppress granted

The government contention a protective sweep or exigent circumstances justified the entry was speculative and lacked foundation. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Lara-Mejia, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156946 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 28, 2020). The automobile exception doesn’t apply … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Govt’s justification for protective sweep or exigency based entry were speculative so motion to suppress granted

pjmedia: Judge Denies Qualified Immunity for Kentucky Child Welfare Workers Who Illegally Strip-Searched Children

pjmedia: Judge Denies Qualified Immunity for Kentucky Child Welfare Workers Who Illegally Strip-Searched Children by Megan Fox:

Posted in Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on pjmedia: Judge Denies Qualified Immunity for Kentucky Child Welfare Workers Who Illegally Strip-Searched Children

Reason: More Than a Year Before Breonna Taylor’s Death, Some of the Same Cops Were Involved in Another Home Invasion Based on Dubious Evidence

Reason: More Than a Year Before Breonna Taylor’s Death, Some of the Same Cops Were Involved in Another Home Invasion Based on Dubious Evidence by Jacob Sullum (“The overlap suggests a pattern of shoddy investigation and reckless paramilitary tactics in … Continue reading →

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on Reason: More Than a Year Before Breonna Taylor’s Death, Some of the Same Cops Were Involved in Another Home Invasion Based on Dubious Evidence

FL5: Compelling password to cell phone violates 5A

An attempt to order a cell phone owner to provide his password to the phone is testimonial under the Fifth Amendment. The court also concludes the foregone conclusion doctrine does not apply. Garcia v. State, 2020 Fla. App. LEXIS 12232 … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on FL5: Compelling password to cell phone violates 5A

OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

Defendant was removed from his house after a search warrant was served by the SWAT team. His false name and DOB to the officers supported his obstruction conviction. State v. Castleberry, 2020-Ohio-4233, 2020 Ohio App. LEXIS 3129 (2d Dist. Aug. … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH2: Giving false name and DOB after SW executed supports obstruction charge

W.D.Wash.: Govt doesn’t need SW to search its own records

The government doesn’t need a search warrant to search its own records. No case says anything like that, and there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the private sense. United States v. Fanyo-Patchou, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155998 (W.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Standards of review | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Govt doesn’t need SW to search its own records

CA6: Cut-and-paste typos in SW can be ignored if intention can be determined

Typographical errors in a search warrant from using another warrant off a computer can be ignored if the intention of the search warrant can be determined. United States v. Abdalla, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 27375 (6th Cir. Aug. 27, 2020):

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on CA6: Cut-and-paste typos in SW can be ignored if intention can be determined

S.D.Ill.: Govt’s affidavits knock-and-announce would be unsafe were unrebutted

Defendant pled in his motion to suppress there was a knock-and-announce violation, and the government responded with affidavits that knocking would be unsafe. Unrebutted, that’s enough to deny a hearing. United States v. Moore, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155454 (S.D. … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and announce, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Govt’s affidavits knock-and-announce would be unsafe were unrebutted

TX14: Arrest outside a house can justify a protective sweep inside

An arrest outside a house, depending on the circumstances, can justify a protective sweep as much as an arrest inside. Defendant also claimed that a secondary protective sweep was unreasonably intense. Even if it was, it doesn’t affect the search … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Protective sweep | Comments Off on TX14: Arrest outside a house can justify a protective sweep inside

S.D.Cal.: 1983 suit against facts of detention barred by Younger abstention

Plaintiff’s claims in substantial part attack the facts of his current detention, and it’s barred by Younger abstention. Mondragon v. County of San Diego, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155166 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2020)*:

Posted in Abstention | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: 1983 suit against facts of detention barred by Younger abstention