Monthly Archives: May 2019

C.D.Ill.: Providing the inventory of the SW execution wasn’t designed to elicit an incriminating response

Providing defendant with the inventory of what was taken in the search, a normal practice usually required by law, was not designed to elicit an incriminating response. Therefore, the statement was voluntary and not subject to Miranda. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Providing the inventory of the SW execution wasn’t designed to elicit an incriminating response

W.D.N.Y.: PC was shown in the affidavit; the possibility of another innocent explanation doesn’t undermine PC

There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant for defendant’s house. The possibility of another explanation doesn’t mean there isn’t probable cause. “The defendant argues that the facts are equally consistent with the possibility that the narcotics were … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Staleness | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: PC was shown in the affidavit; the possibility of another innocent explanation doesn’t undermine PC

OH3: Def’s failure to show actual innocence defeats his claim he never saw SW to challenge it

Defendant claimed he never knew about any search warrants in his case, but he was served with one when he was arrested and his place searched. Even so, there is no indication that he would have prevailed on any search … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on OH3: Def’s failure to show actual innocence defeats his claim he never saw SW to challenge it

The New American: New York Public School District First to Use Facial-recognition System

The New American: New York Public School District First to Use Facial-recognition System by Joe Wolverton, II:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The New American: New York Public School District First to Use Facial-recognition System

D.Colo.: To just say a SW is “stale” in a motion to suppress says nothing; def has to show how or why it is stale

Defendant “cannot simply state general legal principles and expect the Court or the Government to figure out what he means to argue. Burciaga bears the burden here, and this ‘argument’ does not satisfy it. Accordingly, the Court will not inquire … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on D.Colo.: To just say a SW is “stale” in a motion to suppress says nothing; def has to show how or why it is stale

DC: To get the benefit of Heien mistake of law, there has to be something that shows the law mistakenly applied actually applied, and here it didn’t

A D.C. police car stopped, backed up, and four officers got out of the car, walked over to defendant, and told him to “get up.” A reasonable person would not have believed he was free to leave, and this stop … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DC: To get the benefit of Heien mistake of law, there has to be something that shows the law mistakenly applied actually applied, and here it didn’t

C.D.Ill.: Issue preclusion doesn’t fairly apply to officers in § 1983 case after suppression in state court

Issue preclusion would not be applied to preclude defendant officers from litigating the legality of a search that defendant prevailed upon in state court. Applying state law on issue preclusion, it would be unfair to apply it to officers who … Continue reading

Posted in Standing | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: Issue preclusion doesn’t fairly apply to officers in § 1983 case after suppression in state court

IN: SW for house includes the curtilage

A search warrant for a house gives police the ability to search the curtilage, too. Hardin v. State, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 234 (May 29, 2019). Navajo Nation police officers had implied license to approach the front door of a … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Knock and talk, Scope of search | Comments Off on IN: SW for house includes the curtilage

AL: Children missing after mother’s murder was exigency for entry of house

Defendant was believed to have dismembered the mother of his children and the children couldn’t be found. Police got an address and went there but didn’t get an answer. They went to her parents’ house who sent them back to … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on AL: Children missing after mother’s murder was exigency for entry of house

WaPo: Perspective: It’s the middle of the night. Do you know who your iPhone is talking to?

WaPo: Perspective: It’s the middle of the night. Do you know who your iPhone is talking to? by Geoffrey A. Fowler: Apple says, ‘What happens on your iPhone stays on your iPhone.’ Our privacy experiment showed 5,400 hidden app trackers … Continue reading

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: Perspective: It’s the middle of the night. Do you know who your iPhone is talking to?

MO: SW for a house includes the garden in the curtilage

The search warrant for defendant’s home authorized a search of defendant’s garden because, under Jardines, the curtilage is considered part of the house itself. State v. Daggett, 2019 Mo. App. LEXIS 843 (May 28, 2019). A state court’s 2017 cell … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on MO: SW for a house includes the garden in the curtilage

The Hill: Bipartisan thumbs-down to facial recognition technology

The Hill: Bipartisan thumbs-down to facial recognition technology by Dean DeChiaro:

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on The Hill: Bipartisan thumbs-down to facial recognition technology

Cert. granted: Hernández v. Mesa: Whether the cross-border murder of a Mexican citizen states a Bivens claim

Cert. granted: Hernández v. Mesa, No. 17-1678 (ScotusBlog) Issue: Whether, when the plaintiffs plausibly allege that a rogue federal law-enforcement officer violated clearly established Fourth and Fifth amendment rights for which there is no alternative legal remedy, the federal courts … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens | Comments Off on Cert. granted: Hernández v. Mesa: Whether the cross-border murder of a Mexican citizen states a Bivens claim

SCOTUS: Nieves v. Bartlett: Probable cause to arrest defeats a First Amendment retaliation claim except where there otherwise would not have been an arrest

Nieves v. Bartlett, 17–1174 (May 28, 2019): Probable cause to arrest defeats a First Amendment retaliation claim except where there otherwise would not have been an arrest (maybe a really hard standard to meet). SCOTUSBlog: Opinion analysis: The First Amendment, … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause | Comments Off on SCOTUS: Nieves v. Bartlett: Probable cause to arrest defeats a First Amendment retaliation claim except where there otherwise would not have been an arrest

MA: Bag of dope protuding from butt crack was seized in a strip search, not a body cavity search

“During a lawful strip search of the defendant following his arrest, police officers observed a plastic bag protruding from the cleft between his buttocks and caused him to remove it; it was revealed to contain individually wrapped plastic bags of … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading, Strip search | Comments Off on MA: Bag of dope protuding from butt crack was seized in a strip search, not a body cavity search

E.D.Cal.: There’s no REP in the cell or room of the state’s mental hospital

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the cell or room of person under civil commitment. It’s not a jail and there are limited constitutional protections inside. Leonard v. Coalinga State Hosp., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88170 (E.D. Cal. … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: There’s no REP in the cell or room of the state’s mental hospital

M.D.Ala.: “Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings …”

“Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings because the seizure and subsequent civil forfeiture of assets implicates the Fourth Amendment. Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania, 380 U.S. 693, 702 (1965) (holding that the Fourth Amendment is applicable to … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Forfeiture | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: “Motions to suppress evidence are appropriate in civil forfeiture proceedings …”

D.Mass.: SW for house permitted search of a hiding place in the outside wall

The defendant had a “hide,” a hiding place outside his house in the wall. The court finds the hide was withing the scope of the search warrant not and did not require a separate search warrant. “I find that the … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: SW for house permitted search of a hiding place in the outside wall

NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office

NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office by Sonja Hutson: The San Francisco Police Officers’ Association is calling on the chief of police to resign for his handling of a raid on a reporter’s home. The reporter … Continue reading

Posted in Privileges | Comments Off on NPR: Political Fallout Escalates After SF Police Raid Journalist’s Office

OK: Without a specific challenge to overbreadth, trial court errs in deciding it

Defendant moved to suppress his cell phone search for lack of probable cause. He did not challenge the scope of the warrant. Therefore, the district court erred in deciding that the search warrant was overbroad. “The District Court erred when … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Overbreadth | Comments Off on OK: Without a specific challenge to overbreadth, trial court errs in deciding it