Category Archives: Particularity

CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

In this § 1983 case over the particularity of a search warrant over stolen cars on his property, the officers had qualified immunity. The warrant was not so lacking in particularity that a reasonable officer couldn’t rely on it. Rathbun … Continue reading →

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Particularity | Comments Off on CA10: Officers get qualified immunity for SW that was not completely without particularity

D.S.D.: A black nylon bag found outside def’s curtilage could be seized and searched

Officers came to defendant’s house to serve an arrest warrant, but nobody was home. Walking back to the street, the officers saw a black nylon bag laying just beyond railroad ties in the yard between the house and nearer the … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Curtilage, Particularity | Comments Off on D.S.D.: A black nylon bag found outside def’s curtilage could be seized and searched

CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

Individually, none of the factors of reasonable suspicion was enough, but collectively they were. “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

Officers do not need reasonable suspicion to conduct a knock-and-talk. Defendant’s consent to enter wasn’t involuntary because he thought he couldn’t refuse because he was on probation. State v. Fretheim, 2015 UT App 197, 2015 Utah App. LEXIS 206 (August … Continue reading →

Posted in Knock and talk, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on UT: RS not required before a knock-and-talk

N.D.Ga.: Govt’s email search protocol satisfied particularity despite large initial seizure

The government’s protocol for searching defendant’s emails satisfied the particularity requirement. All the emails were produced, but the government searched within them only for emails relating to copyright infringement, the crime under investigation. Other cases are in accord. United States … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Govt’s email search protocol satisfied particularity despite large initial seizure

New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

Adam M. Gershowitz, The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-313. Abstract: Last year, in Riley v. California, the Supreme Court required police to procure a warrant … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on New law review article: The Post-Riley Search Warrant: Search Protocols and Particularity in Cell Phone Searches

GA: Mistake in address not prejudicial where right place was searched; police used address listed with Assessor

The search warrant had a mistaken address. It authorized the search of the plaintiff’s building but listed it as 11195 when it was actually 11193. The wrong building was not searched. Plaintiff did not state a claim for trespass by … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on GA: Mistake in address not prejudicial where right place was searched; police used address listed with Assessor

WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data”

WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data” by Orin Kerr: I recently posted a new draft article, “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data.” The … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on WaPo: New article: “Executing Warrants for Digital Evidence: The Case for Use Restrictions on Nonresponsive Data”

LA: Probationer in the house of another probationer during a PO home visit was searched with RS

Defendant was a probationer in the house of another probationer when the other probationer was subjected to a home visit. After finding marijuana in the bedroom, the officers conducted a protective search of defendant and found drugs. The search was … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Probation / Parole search, Uncategorized | Comments Off on LA: Probationer in the house of another probationer during a PO home visit was searched with RS

E.D.N.Y.: Overseizure of emails did not void the search warrant; some overseizure necessary for a proper investigation

A judge in the E.D.N.Y. may issue a search warrant for emails on Yahoo!’s email server in California under Rule 41 and the Stored Communications Act. The warrant was broad in its particularity, but still constitutional. The warrant lawfully included … Continue reading →

Posted in E-mail, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Overseizure of emails did not void the search warrant; some overseizure necessary for a proper investigation

TN: An RV parked off the property but connected by an electrical cord to the house was subject to search under a warrant for the house

To search vehicles under a search warrant for real property, the vehicles must belong to a person named in the warrant to identify the place or things to be searched. Vehicles belonging to visitors are not subject to search under … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on TN: An RV parked off the property but connected by an electrical cord to the house was subject to search under a warrant for the house

DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging that defendant wasn’t named in the search warrant for his specifically described property. [Remember, search warrants are usually for specifically ID’d places, and naming the owner is almost never necessary. If the … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on DE: Name of owner of property in SW doesn’t need to be identified to be valid

PA: Things “in regards to alleged sexual misconduct with a fourteen year old female” particular enough for a cell phone SW

“Contrary to Dougalewicz’s assertion, the Search Warrants sufficiently identified and limited the items to be searched and seized as text messages, phone calls and picture mail from and to the Verizon and Sprint phones, ‘in regards to alleged sexual misconduct … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Particularity | Comments Off on PA: Things “in regards to alleged sexual misconduct with a fourteen year old female” particular enough for a cell phone SW

E.D.Ark.: Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable

Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable. Also, the alleged overseizure of records was not clearly unreasonable. Mountain Pure LLC v. Roberts, 2015 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading →

Posted in Excessive force, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Use of a SWAT team to execute a document search warrant was not so unreasonable that it made the entire search unreasonable

D.Minn.: Officer on scene noted SW facially deficient for lack of particularity and had another issued that cured the first

Defendant here argues that the difference between a black or a dark gray Dodge Charger having been involved in a bank robbery was significant. It’s not, especially when the vehicle flees as the officer attempted to stop it shortly after … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Officer on scene noted SW facially deficient for lack of particularity and had another issued that cured the first

E.D.Pa.: In complex financial crimes, particularity standard must be flexible

This financial search warrant may appear to be overbroad, but it alleged a seven year scheme and sought many types of financial records. “This is the sort of ‘complex scheme[] spanning many years’ for which our Court of Appeals prescribed … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: In complex financial crimes, particularity standard must be flexible

NY, Bronx Co.: Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity

Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity. This is the case against NYPD officers accused of ticket fixing. People v. Anthony, 2015 NY Slip Op 25003, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44 … Continue reading →

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonableness, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NY, Bronx Co.: Wiretap minimization requirements are founded on the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and of particularity

CA7: SW for computers with CP on premises permitted search of hard drive found hidden in def’s mother’s car

Officers had a search warrant for child pornography on computer devices on the premises, and the search warrant named the premises and one vehicle. At the time of execution of the warrant, defendant’s mother was there with her car, and … Continue reading →

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on CA7: SW for computers with CP on premises permitted search of hard drive found hidden in def’s mother’s car

E.D.N.Y.: Officers’ limits and good faith saved technically overbroad document SW

The Medicare fraud limitation in this document search warrant was only stated in a couple of paragraphs of the things to be seized, so it was technically overbroad. The officers’ conduct of the search, however, was limited and done in … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Officers’ limits and good faith saved technically overbroad document SW

S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone PC and particularity; GFE applies to cell phone warrant execution

Defendant was a guard at Riker’s Island prison complex, and he was arrested in a drug conspiracy. When a cell phone is removed from a person at the time of arrest and a search warrant is sought, the government doesn’t … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Overbreadth, Particularity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Cell phone PC and particularity; GFE applies to cell phone warrant execution