Category Archives: Reasonableness

CA3: Consent to search car moots possible mistake of fact motion to suppress

Defendant’s consent to a search of his car after a traffic stop moots the issue that the stop was based on a mistake of fact. United States v. Prado, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 38445 (3d Cir. Dec. 24, 2019).* Facebook’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA3: Consent to search car moots possible mistake of fact motion to suppress

S.D.N.Y.: Alleged violation of Florida law by def’s arrest there where local officer assisted federal officers wasn’t a 4A violation

An alleged violation of Florida law in defendant’s arrest there with the participation of local law enforcement isn’t shown to be a Fourth Amendment violation. “And Teman has not cited any authority so holding or, for that matter, treating such … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Reasonableness | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Alleged violation of Florida law by def’s arrest there where local officer assisted federal officers wasn’t a 4A violation

SD: That same traffic stop issue was rejected before this one denies state reasonable mistake of law argument

The court previously held that two of three brake lights emitting only red light and one with a hole in it also emitting white light wasn’t a traffic offense. Therefore, the state couldn’t use a claim of objectively reasonable mistake … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on SD: That same traffic stop issue was rejected before this one denies state reasonable mistake of law argument

IA: Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant unreasonable where no effort made to determine if he was the right guy or not

Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant here was unreasonable. Defendant claimed he was the wrong Troy Ford, and the officer searched him finding drugs before even attempting to verify whether he was the right one. It didn’t take … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonableness | Comments Off on IA: Arrest of the “wrong guy” under a warrant unreasonable where no effort made to determine if he was the right guy or not

D.N.M.: Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable; there was still probable cause

Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable here. “The Court finds that the officers reasonably mistook Defendant for Mr. Pacheco. Defendant not only matched Mr. Pacheco’s description, but the officers also witnessed Defendant leaving an apartment Mr. Pacheco was known to … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Stopping the wrong guy wasn’t unreasonable; there was still probable cause

OH6: Flawed justification for ordering def out of vehicle wasn’t prejudicial where Mimms allowed it in any event

“Nevertheless, while the officers may have been mistaken in their belief that a search of the vehicle could be performed absent a custodial arrest, their flawed justification for ordering the occupants out of the vehicle was not prejudicial here. This … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH6: Flawed justification for ordering def out of vehicle wasn’t prejudicial where Mimms allowed it in any event

D.Kan.: Consent search of truck led to PC it was hauling a lot of cash; use of a drill then to try to find it was reasonable

Defendant was stopped and consented to a search of his truck. The consent search led to probable cause to believe the truck was transporting a lot of cash. Using a drill to find the cash was reasonable once there was … Continue reading →

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Consent search of truck led to PC it was hauling a lot of cash; use of a drill then to try to find it was reasonable

E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of things denied until 2255 resolved

Defendant seeks return of things of potential evidentiary value. The government opposes on the ground that a 2255 has not yet been filed, and the things might still have value. That’s reasonable for the court. United States v. Saldivar, 2019 … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Motion for return of things denied until 2255 resolved

OH7: Officer’s stop of def outside of jurisdiction wasn’t unlawful because local officers were ultimately there, too

Defendant was stopped outside the officer’s jurisdiction. The officer had probable cause to stop and detain defendant when he personally observed defendant’s traffic violation and personally observed defendant’s slurred speech and sluggish motor skills. The interest in protecting the public … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH7: Officer’s stop of def outside of jurisdiction wasn’t unlawful because local officers were ultimately there, too

CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

Driving too slow for too long justifies a stop, at least Heien makes it reasonable: “Given the dearth of authority on whether a single vehicle constitutes traffic …, the ambiguity in the statute, and the danger observed by the officer, … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: Heien objective reasonableness applies to a stop for driving too slow even though it was just def’s car in traffic

D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning. Mimms, of course, permits the occupants to be ordered out. Over time, this ripened to reasonable suspicion. United States v. Lugo, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 200612 (D. Mont. Nov. 19, … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Being ordered from your vehicle doesn’t require a Miranda warning

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Impressions from the oral argument in Kansas v. Glover

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Impressions from the oral argument in Kansas v. Glover by Orin S. Kerr On reasonable suspicion and how to calculate it.

Posted in Reasonableness | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Impressions from the oral argument in Kansas v. Glover

E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

Defendant contended that police drove onto the curtilage and shined police headlights and lights into the premises. The USMJ couldn’t adequately resolve that because of a lack of photographic evidence showing what was where. But, that led to a consent … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Police allegely entered curtilage to shine headlights in windows, and homeowner consented to entry; def was inside and without standing to contest

OH4: Heien good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply to a stop under a completely inapplicable ordinance

Defendant’s stop was unreasonable, and Heien’s good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply. The city code provision dealt with turning at intersections, and the officer stopped defendant for turning into a driveway which is not an “intersection.” State v. Ware, … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonableness, State constitution | Comments Off on OH4: Heien good faith mistake of fact doesn’t apply to a stop under a completely inapplicable ordinance

AL: Failure to have arrest warrant in hand under state law voids the arrest and the search incident that occurred; Heien inapplicable

Defendant was unreasonably and mistakenly arrested without the officer having the arrest warrant in hand as required by state law, and the search incident to the arrest is suppressed. The court finds Heien and the good faith exception inapplicable because … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on AL: Failure to have arrest warrant in hand under state law voids the arrest and the search incident that occurred; Heien inapplicable

CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

The defendants observed plaintiff’s actions and they saw probable cause to believe he committed trespass. Therefore, the false arrest claim fails. His excessive force claim, however, survives summary judgment. Using the criminal trial testimony wasn’t particularly helpful or controlling because … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA11: Criminal trial record not fully binding on ptf who was on trial there because incentives to litigate were different

OH2: Officer’s sexual assault of motorist criminally violated 4A

Defendant was a part time police officer conviction of state civil rights violations for sexual assault during frisks of women that clearly exceeded the Fourth Amendment. State v. Sanderson, 2019-Ohio-3589, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3673 (2d Dist. Sept. 6, 2019).* … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on OH2: Officer’s sexual assault of motorist criminally violated 4A

CA8: Strip search of female detainee on parking lot stated § 1983 claim

Nearly public strip search of female detainee on an open parking lot by a female officer also berating her with a male officer nearby stated a claim and overcame qualified immunity. Robinson v. Hawkins, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 26772 (8th … Continue reading →

Posted in Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Strip search | Comments Off on CA8: Strip search of female detainee on parking lot stated § 1983 claim

CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI

“A group of masked City of Detroit police officers broke down plaintiff Katrina McGrew’s door, threw her to the ground, and handcuffed her so tightly it left bruises. When she complained about how constricting the handcuffs were, the officers threatened … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: Tightening handcuffs more when arrestee complains and threatening her life overcame QI

DE: DNA warrant fails because affidavit for it does show how or why it could be found

“As previously noted, this Court must pay great deference to a magistrate’s determination of probable cause and must take a common-sense approach rather than a hyper-technical approach. Nonetheless, given the totality of the circumstances set forth in the Affidavit, including … Continue reading →

Posted in DNA, Nexus, Probable cause, Reasonableness | Comments Off on DE: DNA warrant fails because affidavit for it does show how or why it could be found