Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

Individually, none of the factors of reasonable suspicion was enough, but collectively they were. “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: “In this respect, we must be mindful of the particular exigencies presented to the officers, who must make decisions to safeguard their own and the public’s safety under the fog of rapidly developing situations and without the luxury of complete information.”

N.D.Cal.: Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing

Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing. “Proceeding under the trespass theory, rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy theory, defendants have not demonstrated that they have a possessory … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Arguing for trespass rather than the reasonable expectation of privacy standard doesn’t enhance the likelihood of showing standing

D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

Defendants moved for return of their property after conviction and the appeal was affirmed. The government gets to keep it pending conclusion of any collateral review which might be filed. United States v. Banks, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107994 (D.Colo. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Standing | Comments Off on D.Colo.: Motion for return of property denied until post-conviction process over

IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not arguing an issue that was not decided for the defense under the state constitution until two years after his appeal was decided. Counsel is not charged with anticipating changes in the law under … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IA: Def counsel not charged with anticipating changes in law; no IAC for not arguing an issue adopted two years after appeal

N.D.Fla.: Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was RS

Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was reasonable suspicion that the defendant was there with the drugs. United States v. Mendoza, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109526 (N.D.Fla. August 18, 2015).* A worker’s gesture was not consent … Continue reading

Posted in Apparent authority, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Fla.: Showing up at a prearranged drop point, a motel room, was RS

MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility. It is based on a database that is sufficiently reliable to based a stop on. Commonwealth v. Ramos, 2015 Mass. App. LEXIS 116 (August … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: A license plate reader is not treated as an anonymous informant with little or no credibility

D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant’s stop was based on the LPN coming back “not assigned,” and then the officer smelled alcohol on him. The use of the drug dog during all this did not extend the stop and was not unreasonable. United States v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Kan.: LPN being unassigned was justification for a stop and then the use of a drug dog wasn’t unreasonable

N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief, if they can be proved. United States v. Ochoa, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105925 (N.D.Ga. July 8, 2015). Officers had reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: To get a hearing on a motion to suppress, defendant has to allege facts sufficient to provide relief

E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

Officers stopped defendant thinking he was another. After defendant proved he was not the man they were looking for, they continued to detain him to check for warrants. He refused to consent to a patdown, and the officer then touched … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Continuing stop after def proved he wasn’t person police were looking for was unreasonable

AK: Drug paraphernalia and meth were found by plain feel

On defendant’s stop, the officer saw a cut off straw in defendant’s shirt pocket, and a frisk was justified because of hands in the pockets. The frisk of his thin material shorts revealed a lighter and more straws and it … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: Drug paraphernalia and meth were found by plain feel

CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

CI’s prediction of defendant’s route of travel with heroin was corroborated by GPS placed on defendant’s car with a warrant. United States v. Reaves, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13745 (7th Cir. August 6, 2015). A citizen informant called DC Metro … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: CI’s prediction of route of travel confirmed by GPS planted with SW was PC

D.Neb.: Driving in tandem with a load of drugs justified frisk of occupants because of potential for weapons

Defendant was stopped because he was apparently driving in tandem with another vehicle carrying drugs that was stopped, and he ran a red light. Because it was a drug case and defendant was operating countersurveillance, a frisk for weapons was … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Driving in tandem with a load of drugs justified frisk of occupants because of potential for weapons

S.D.Ill.: A blood trail at a house 2½ hours after a shooting with missing participants was exigency

The previous night there was a shootout in East St. Louis in defendant’s neighborhood, some shots a block from defendant. Two people ended up in the hospital, neither associated with defendant’s address. In investigating at defendant’s house 2½ hours later, … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: A blood trail at a house 2½ hours after a shooting with missing participants was exigency

NC: A broken window and screen off is not an exigency without a burglary call or more information

A broken window at a house and a screen leaning against the house without other objective evidence of a break in was not reasonable cause to believe that there was a recent or ongoing burglary to justify a police entry … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on NC: A broken window and screen off is not an exigency without a burglary call or more information

W.D.Mo.: Failure to show or leave a copy of the SW or make the inventory in the def’s presence has nothing to do with his statements

“Defendant James Allen Crippen filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence in the matter (Doc. 25) in which he argues that officers executing a search warrant at his home violated Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Failure to show or leave a copy of the SW or make the inventory in the def’s presence has nothing to do with his statements

E.D.Wis.: Motion to suppress decided on police reports alone: only a hunch and no reasonable suspicion

Based on the police reports alone which are provided the court in the defendant’s effort to get an evidentiary hearing, the court denies the evidentiary hearing and then suppresses the search finding that the stop was based on a mere … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Motion to suppress decided on police reports alone: only a hunch and no reasonable suspicion

MA: Asking def what was in his mouth was a seizure without RS (it was a baggie of crack)

Officers encountered defendant on the street. He mumbled when he talked to them, and they asked what was in his mouth. That became a seizure. “We conclude that a reasonable person would not have felt free to terminate the encounter, … Continue reading

Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MA: Asking def what was in his mouth was a seizure without RS (it was a baggie of crack)

E.D.Ark.: Inevitable discovery applies; def counsel overlooked suppression motion, but it wouldn’t have won

The state conceded that defense counsel’s failure to file a motion to suppress satisfied the performance prong of Strickland. At issue, however, was the prejudice prong, and that failure did not amount to prejudice because the evidence would have been … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Inevitable discovery applies; def counsel overlooked suppression motion, but it wouldn’t have won

DE: Search warrant for some things and “other items that may be stolen” wasn’t overbroad where officers used a list

A Franks challenge in Delaware requires an affidavit from the defendant, and there isn’t one. The Franks claim is, at best, only a conclusory statement that the officer had an ends-justifies-the-means mentality, but, as a whole, probable cause is shown. … Continue reading

Posted in Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DE: Search warrant for some things and “other items that may be stolen” wasn’t overbroad where officers used a list

FL5: With PC, a vehicle search can occur with or without a warrant

The officer here had probable cause the vehicle contained contraband and he could have searched under the automobile exception. Instead he got a warrant. “See Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52, 90 S. Ct. 1975, 26 L. Ed. 2d … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL5: With PC, a vehicle search can occur with or without a warrant