NC: A broken window and screen off is not an exigency without a burglary call or more information

A broken window at a house and a screen leaning against the house without other objective evidence of a break in was not reasonable cause to believe that there was a recent or ongoing burglary to justify a police entry into the dwelling. There had been no burglary call which indicates recency. Thus, the entry violated the Fourth Amendment. State v. Jordan, 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 668 (August 4, 2015).

Defendant’s 2009 blood draw was governed by 2013’s McNeely and a warrant should have been obtained. State v. Munoz, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8109 (Tex.App.–El Paso July 31, 2015).*

Pulling into a Hardee’s parking lot to inquire of the defendant who was sitting in a car parked near the dumpster while the restaurant was closed was a stop without reasonable suspicion. Nothing was going on. DUI dismissed. State v. Latham, 2015 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 624 (August 3, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant requirement. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.