Category Archives: Good faith exception

FL5: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident valid under Davis GFE

Pre-Riley cell phone search incident: “We agree that the initial search violated Burton’s Fourth Amendment rights but nevertheless affirm the denial of his motion to suppress evidence based on the exception to the exclusionary rule articulated by the United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on FL5: Pre-Riley cell phone search incident valid under Davis GFE

E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

The affidavit truly failed to show probable cause, and a reasonably well trained police should have known it. This involved a gun in the home, and considering the Second Amendment right to bear arms and the Fourth Amendment right to … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.Tex.: SW for gun was clearly without PC and no reasonable officer could rely on it; court considers Second Amendment implications in denying govt GFE

D.Minn.: If there are enough “thorny issues” on validity of warrant, just turn to GFE [should have said: “close enough for government work”]

“But in this case, it is unclear whether other documents [the attachments]—in addition to the one page List of Items to Be Seized—accompanied the search warrant. In other words, it is impossible to tell, in this four-corners review, whether Subsection … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Minn.: If there are enough “thorny issues” on validity of warrant, just turn to GFE [should have said: “close enough for government work”]

S.D.N.Y.: Missing attachment can’t be considered on PC, but it can on GFE

While a missing attachment can’t be considered as to the “four corners” analysis of the validity of the probable cause for issuance of the search warrant, it’s still quite relative to applying the good faith exception. United States v. Alston, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Missing attachment can’t be considered on PC, but it can on GFE

E.D.N.C.: State judge’s issuance of CSLI warrant across state lines was likely without jurisdiction, but still saved by good faith exception in federal court

The state CSLI warrant here (and noting the conflict in authorities) was deficient in its factual showing, but not so bad that the SW couldn’t be relied upon in good faith. The fact the cell phone company’s records were out … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception | Comments Off on E.D.N.C.: State judge’s issuance of CSLI warrant across state lines was likely without jurisdiction, but still saved by good faith exception in federal court

A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Davis good faith applies to pre-Jones GPS installation

GPS was installed on defendant’s car prior to Jones and it’s not excludable under Davis good faith. United States v. Richards, 2016 CCA LEXIS 285 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. May 2, 2016). The officer didn’t smell marijuana on defendant’s person, … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Probable cause | Comments Off on A.F.Ct.Crim.App.: Davis good faith applies to pre-Jones GPS installation

CA10: GFE applies throughout: arguable PC overcomes allegation of lack of neutral detached magistrate, overbreadth, and even staleness

“This case calls for us to apply Leon where the judge who issued the search warrant was arguably not neutral and detached. Although we are unaware of any court applying the good faith exception in such circumstances, it is apparent … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate, Overbreadth, Staleness | Comments Off on CA10: GFE applies throughout: arguable PC overcomes allegation of lack of neutral detached magistrate, overbreadth, and even staleness

KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

While McNeely was decided in April 2013 and defendant’s DWI stop was in September 2013, the state supreme court had not held the implied consent statute unconstitutional until later. Therefore, the good faith exception applied. State v. Kraemer, 2016 Kan. … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception | Comments Off on KS: State gets benefit of GFE in DUI cases in a post-McNeely stop but before state supreme court ruled

AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

Search warrants in Alabama have to be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed. Here, the warrant was to the Sheriff of Mobile County, but an officer of the Mobile PD executed it. This was invalid execution. … Continue reading →

Posted in Forfeiture, Good faith exception, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AL SWs must be executed only by the officers to whom they are directed

W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

A cell phone ping order allegedly in violation of ECPA was not subject to suppression. The warrantless entry into the house was justified by exigent circumstances. United States v. Banks, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53876 (W.D.Okla. April 22, 2016). The … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, ECPA, Good faith exception | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: Ping order not subject to exclusionary rule under ECPA

TN: GFE for McNeely issues has to come from state supreme court

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals again declines to adopt a good faith exception for failure to comply with McNeely–that’s the state supreme court’s job. State v. Wilson, 2016 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 302 (April 21, 2016) (dissent).* An infant, through … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on TN: GFE for McNeely issues has to come from state supreme court

M.D.Ga.: CI’s tip had sufficient detail with sufficient corroboration to be RS

“Although Cartwright does not appear to challenge the CI’s basis of knowledge for the tip, it is a factor that is considered in the reliability analysis. … Even so, that fact, considered alongside the other substantial factors, leads to the … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Ga.: CI’s tip had sufficient detail with sufficient corroboration to be RS

TN: No GFE for warrantless blood draw where no exigency at all

In a warrantless blood draw case under McNeely, the state argued for a good faith exception, analogizing the state’s new statutory good faith exception, which the court finds inapplicable. There simply was no exigent circumstance in this case to dispense … Continue reading →

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception | Comments Off on TN: No GFE for warrantless blood draw where no exigency at all

LA2: GFE applies to GPS nearly two years before Jones; here, def fled and abandoned car

A GPS tracker was placed on defendant’s vehicle nearly two years before Jones, and he’d been under investigation for more than a year prior to that. Davis good faith would apply to the tracking, but that’s really not important: On … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA2: GFE applies to GPS nearly two years before Jones; here, def fled and abandoned car

W.D.Ky.: Affidavit truly was “bare bones” on nexus, so no GFE

“It generalizes that ‘an individual’ may have information on his or her phone that connects him or her to a crime, co-defendants or victims, rather than specifically connecting Ramirez, the crime with which he was charged, or any known information … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: Affidavit truly was “bare bones” on nexus, so no GFE

FL5: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw saved by GFE

A pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw was unconstitutional now but saved by the good faith exception because it was valid at the time it happened. State v. Liles, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5427 (Fla. 5th DCA April 8, 2016). Arguing over … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL5: Pre-McNeely warrantless blood draw saved by GFE

D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

When arguing that the good faith exception does not apply, the “wholly abandoned his judicial role” exception needs an offer of proof. If, however, there is, in fact, probable cause, how do you prove that? You can’t. United States v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Can’t prove judge issuing SW was a “rubberstamp” for the police when there was, in fact, probable cause

TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

In 2011, Tennessee adopted the Exclusionary Rule Reform Act with a statutory good faith exception that included “clerical errors.” Failing to leave a copy of the warrant at the place searched or with the householder is not a “clerical error.” … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on TN: Failure to leave the SW not a “clerical error” subject to cure or GFE

N.D.Ga.: State exceptions to GFE don’t apply in federal court even where state judge issued SW

A Georgia state judge issued this search warrant, and it was supported by probable cause. In any event, the good faith exception saves it. Any exception to the good faith exception under Georgia law is irrelevant in a federal prosecution. … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: State exceptions to GFE don’t apply in federal court even where state judge issued SW

CA4: Provision in order of protection for def to surrender firearms was subject to consent and GFE

Defendant came to the sheriff’s office and was served with an order of protection. He then consented to a search of his house in response to the provision in the order of protection: “Respondent shall surrender any and all firearms … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA4: Provision in order of protection for def to surrender firearms was subject to consent and GFE